A Stealthy Wrongdoer: Feature-Oriented Reconstruction Attack against Split Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04115v2
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:52:46 GMT
• Title: A Stealthy Wrongdoer: Feature-Oriented Reconstruction Attack against Split Learning
• Authors: Xiaoyang Xu, Mengda Yang, Wenzhe Yi, Ziang Li, Juan Wang, Hongxin Hu, Yong Zhuang, Yaxin Liu,
• Abstract summary: Split Learning (SL) is a distributed learning framework renowned for its privacy-preserving features and minimal computational requirements. Previous research consistently highlights the potential privacy breaches in SL systems by server adversaries reconstructing training data. This paper introduces a new semi-honest Data Reconstruction Attack on SL, named Feature-Oriented Reconstruction Attack (FORA)
• Score: 14.110303634976272
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Split Learning (SL) is a distributed learning framework renowned for its privacy-preserving features and minimal computational requirements. Previous research consistently highlights the potential privacy breaches in SL systems by server adversaries reconstructing training data. However, these studies often rely on strong assumptions or compromise system utility to enhance attack performance. This paper introduces a new semi-honest Data Reconstruction Attack on SL, named Feature-Oriented Reconstruction Attack (FORA). In contrast to prior works, FORA relies on limited prior knowledge, specifically that the server utilizes auxiliary samples from the public without knowing any client's private information. This allows FORA to conduct the attack stealthily and achieve robust performance. The key vulnerability exploited by FORA is the revelation of the model representation preference in the smashed data output by victim client. FORA constructs a substitute client through feature-level transfer learning, aiming to closely mimic the victim client's representation preference. Leveraging this substitute client, the server trains the attack model to effectively reconstruct private data. Extensive experiments showcase FORA's superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, the paper systematically evaluates the proposed method's applicability across diverse settings and advanced defense strategies.

Related papers

• Federated Face Forgery Detection Learning with Personalized Representation [63.90408023506508]
  Deep generator technology can produce high-quality fake videos that are indistinguishable, posing a serious social threat. Traditional forgery detection methods directly centralized training on data. The paper proposes a novel federated face forgery detection learning with personalized representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T02:20:30Z)
• Let's Focus: Focused Backdoor Attack against Federated Transfer Learning [12.68970864847173]
  Federated Transfer Learning (FTL) is the most general variation of Federated Learning. In this paper, we investigate this intriguing Federated Learning scenario to identify and exploit a vulnerability. The proposed attack can be carried out by one of the clients during the Federated Learning phase of FTL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T10:11:44Z)
• Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attacks [48.70867241987739]
  InferGuard is a novel Byzantine-robust aggregation rule aimed at defending against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. The results of our experiments indicate that our defense mechanism is highly effective in protecting against client-side training data distribution inference attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T17:41:35Z)
• A More Secure Split: Enhancing the Security of Privacy-Preserving Split Learning [2.853180143237022]
  Split learning (SL) is a new collaborative learning technique that allows participants to train machine learning models without the client sharing raw data. Previous works demonstrated that reconstructing Activation Maps (AMs) could result in privacy leakage of client data. In this paper, we improve upon previous works by constructing a protocol based on U-shaped SL that can operate on homomorphically encrypted data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T18:39:30Z)
• Client-side Gradient Inversion Against Federated Learning from Poisoning [59.74484221875662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed participants to train a global model without sharing data directly to a central server. Recent studies have revealed that FL is vulnerable to gradient inversion attack (GIA), which aims to reconstruct the original training samples. We propose Client-side poisoning Gradient Inversion (CGI), which is a novel attack method that can be launched from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T03:48:27Z)
• FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning [60.576073964874]
  Federated learning enables learning from decentralized data sources without compromising privacy. It is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious clients interfere with the training process. We propose a new defense mechanism that focuses on the client-side, called FedDefender, to help benign clients train robust local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T08:00:41Z)
• Local Model Reconstruction Attacks in Federated Learning and their Uses [9.14750410129878]
  Local model reconstruction attack allows the adversary to trigger other classical attacks in a more effective way. We propose a novel model-based attribute inference attack in federated learning leveraging the local model reconstruction attack. Our work provides a new angle for designing powerful and explainable attacks to effectively quantify the privacy risk in FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T15:27:03Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)
• Curse or Redemption? How Data Heterogeneity Affects the Robustness of Federated Learning [51.15273664903583]
  Data heterogeneity has been identified as one of the key features in federated learning but often overlooked in the lens of robustness to adversarial attacks. This paper focuses on characterizing and understanding its impact on backdooring attacks in federated learning through comprehensive experiments using synthetic and the LEAF benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-01T06:06:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.