Semantic API Alignment: Linking High-level User Goals to APIs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04236v1
• Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:54:32 GMT
• Title: Semantic API Alignment: Linking High-level User Goals to APIs
• Authors: Robert Feldt, Riccardo Coppola,
• Abstract summary: We present a vision to span multiple steps from requirements engineering to implementation using existing libraries. This approach, which we call Semantic API Alignment (SEAL), aims to bridge the gap between a user's high-level goals and the specific functions of one or more APIs.
• Score: 6.494714497852088
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming key in automating and assisting various software development tasks, including text-based tasks in requirements engineering but also in coding. Typically, these models are used to automate small portions of existing tasks, but we present a broader vision to span multiple steps from requirements engineering to implementation using existing libraries. This approach, which we call Semantic API Alignment (SEAL), aims to bridge the gap between a user's high-level goals and the specific functions of one or more APIs. In this position paper, we propose a system architecture where a set of LLM-powered ``agents'' match such high-level objectives with appropriate API calls. This system could facilitate automated programming by finding matching links or, alternatively, explaining mismatches to guide manual intervention or further development. As an initial pilot, our paper demonstrates this concept by applying LLMs to Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE), via sub-goal analysis, for aligning with REST API specifications, specifically through a case study involving a GitHub statistics API. We discuss the potential of our approach to enhance complex tasks in software development and requirements engineering and outline future directions for research.

Related papers

• Demystifying Application Programming Interfaces (APIs): Unlocking the Power of Large Language Models and Other Web-based AI Services in Social Work Research [0.0]
  Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are essential tools for social work researchers aiming to harness advanced technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs) and other AI services. This paper demystifies APIs and illustrates how they can enhance research methodologies. Practical code examples demonstrate how LLMs can generate API code for accessing specialized services, such as extracting data from unstructured text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T16:07:12Z)
• A Systematic Evaluation of Large Code Models in API Suggestion: When, Which, and How [53.65636914757381]
  API suggestion is a critical task in modern software development. Recent advancements in large code models (LCMs) have shown promise in the API suggestion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T03:12:35Z)
• ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agents [7.166156709980112]
  We introduce textscShortcutsBench, a large-scale benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of API-based agents. textscShortcutsBench includes a wealth of real APIs from Apple Inc.'s operating systems. Our evaluation reveals significant limitations in handling complex queries related to API selection, parameter filling, and requesting necessary information from systems and users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T08:45:02Z)
• Octopus: On-device language model for function calling of software APIs [9.78611123915888]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play a crucial role due to their advanced text processing and generation abilities. This study introduces a new strategy aimed at harnessing on-device LLMs in invoking software APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T01:29:28Z)
• API-BLEND: A Comprehensive Corpora for Training and Benchmarking API LLMs [28.840207102132286]
  We focus on the task of identifying, curating, and transforming existing datasets. We introduce API-BLEND, a large corpora for training and systematic testing of tool-augmented LLMs. We demonstrate the utility of the API-BLEND dataset for both training and benchmarking purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:30:49Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)
• Interactive Task Planning with Language Models [97.86399877812923]
  An interactive robot framework accomplishes long-horizon task planning and can easily generalize to new goals or distinct tasks, even during execution. Recent large language model based approaches can allow for more open-ended planning but often require heavy prompt engineering or domain-specific pretrained models. We propose a simple framework that achieves interactive task planning with language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T17:59:12Z)
• Enhancing API Documentation through BERTopic Modeling and Summarization [0.0]
  This paper focuses on the complexities of interpreting Application Programming Interface (API) documentation. Official API documentation serves as a primary source of information for developers, but it can often be extensive and lacks user-friendliness. Our novel approach employs the strengths of BERTopic for topic modeling and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to automatically generate summaries of API documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T15:57:12Z)
• ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs [104.37772295581088]
  Open-source large language models (LLMs), e.g., LLaMA, remain significantly limited in tool-use capabilities. We introduce ToolLLM, a general tool-usetuning encompassing data construction, model training, and evaluation. We first present ToolBench, an instruction-tuning framework for tool use, which is constructed automatically using ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T15:56:53Z)
• Instruct2Act: Mapping Multi-modality Instructions to Robotic Actions with Large Language Model [63.66204449776262]
  Instruct2Act is a framework that maps multi-modal instructions to sequential actions for robotic manipulation tasks. Our approach is adjustable and flexible in accommodating various instruction modalities and input types. Our zero-shot method outperformed many state-of-the-art learning-based policies in several tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T17:59:49Z)
• TaskMatrix.AI: Completing Tasks by Connecting Foundation Models with Millions of APIs [71.7495056818522]
  We introduce TaskMatrix.AI as a new AI ecosystem that connects foundation models with millions of APIs for task completion. We will present our vision of how to build such an ecosystem, explain each key component, and use study cases to illustrate both the feasibility of this vision and the main challenges we need to address next.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T03:30:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.