ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00132v2
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:57:58 GMT
• Title: ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agents
• Authors: Haiyang Shen, Yue Li, Desong Meng, Dongqi Cai, Sheng Qi, Li Zhang, Mengwei Xu, Yun Ma,
• Abstract summary: We introduce textscShortcutsBench, a large-scale benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of API-based agents. textscShortcutsBench includes a wealth of real APIs from Apple Inc.'s operating systems. Our evaluation reveals significant limitations in handling complex queries related to API selection, parameter filling, and requesting necessary information from systems and users.
• Score: 7.166156709980112
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in integrating large language models (LLMs) with application programming interfaces (APIs) have gained significant interest in both academia and industry. These API-based agents, leveraging the strong autonomy and planning capabilities of LLMs, can efficiently solve problems requiring multi-step actions. However, their ability to handle multi-dimensional difficulty levels, diverse task types, and real-world demands through APIs remains unknown. In this paper, we introduce \textsc{ShortcutsBench}, a large-scale benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of API-based agents in solving tasks with varying levels of difficulty, diverse task types, and real-world demands. \textsc{ShortcutsBench} includes a wealth of real APIs from Apple Inc.'s operating systems, refined user queries from shortcuts, human-annotated high-quality action sequences from shortcut developers, and accurate parameter filling values about primitive parameter types, enum parameter types, outputs from previous actions, and parameters that need to request necessary information from the system or user. Our extensive evaluation of agents built with $5$ leading open-source (size >= 57B) and $4$ closed-source LLMs (e.g. Gemini-1.5-Pro and GPT-3.5) reveals significant limitations in handling complex queries related to API selection, parameter filling, and requesting necessary information from systems and users. These findings highlight the challenges that API-based agents face in effectively fulfilling real and complex user queries. All datasets, code, and experimental results will be available at \url{https://github.com/eachsheep/shortcutsbench}.

Related papers

• A Framework for Testing and Adapting REST APIs as LLM Tools [5.758488787763118]
  We present a novel testing framework aimed at evaluating and enhancing the readiness of REST APIs to function as tools for agents. Our framework transforms apis as tools, generates comprehensive test cases for the APIs, tests cases into natural language instructions and evaluates the agent's ability t correctly invoke the API and process its inputs and responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T02:52:08Z)
• Test Amplification for REST APIs via Single and Multi-Agent LLM Systems [1.6499388997661122]
  We show how single-agent and multi-agent LLM systems can amplify a REST API test suite. Our evaluation demonstrates increased API coverage, identification of numerous bugs in the API under test, and insights into the computational cost and energy consumption of both approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T20:19:50Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks. However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback. We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• CallNavi, A Challenge and Empirical Study on LLM Function Calling and Routing [7.443502461016052]
  This work contributes to the evaluation and assessment of AI-based software development. Novel benchmarking specifically designed for API function selection, parameter generation, and nested API execution. An empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art language models, analyzing their performance. A hybrid approach to API routing, combining general-purpose large language models for API selection with fine-tuned models and prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T14:12:43Z)
• ExploraCoder: Advancing code generation for multiple unseen APIs via planning and chained exploration [70.26807758443675]
  ExploraCoder is a training-free framework that empowers large language models to invoke unseen APIs in code solution. We show that ExploraCoder significantly improves performance for models lacking prior API knowledge, achieving an absolute increase of 11.24% over niave RAG approaches and 14.07% over pretraining methods in pass@10.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T19:00:15Z)
• SEAL: Suite for Evaluating API-use of LLMs [1.2528321519119252]
  SEAL is an end-to-end testbed designed to evaluate large language models in real-world API usage. It standardizes existing benchmarks, integrates an agent system for testing API retrieval and planning, and addresses the instability of real-time APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T20:16:49Z)
• ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling [139.07157814653638]
  ToolACE is an automatic agentic pipeline designed to generate accurate, complex, and diverse tool-learning data. We demonstrate that models trained on our synthesized data, even with only 8B parameters, achieve state-of-the-art performance on the Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T03:19:56Z)
• FANTAstic SEquences and Where to Find Them: Faithful and Efficient API Call Generation through State-tracked Constrained Decoding and Reranking [57.53742155914176]
  API call generation is the cornerstone of large language models' tool-using ability. Existing supervised and in-context learning approaches suffer from high training costs, poor data efficiency, and generated API calls that can be unfaithful to the API documentation and the user's request. We propose an output-side optimization approach called FANTASE to address these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T23:44:02Z)
• MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
  Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z)
• LLM-based Frameworks for API Argument Filling in Task-Oriented Conversational Systems [39.54340884416936]
  We study the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for the problem of API argument filling task. Our experimental results demonstrate that when paired with proposed techniques, the argument filling performance of LLMs noticeably improves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T06:54:53Z)
• Semantic API Alignment: Linking High-level User Goals to APIs [6.494714497852088]
  We present a vision to span multiple steps from requirements engineering to implementation using existing libraries. This approach, which we call Semantic API Alignment (SEAL), aims to bridge the gap between a user's high-level goals and the specific functions of one or more APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T11:54:32Z)
• Octopus: On-device language model for function calling of software APIs [9.78611123915888]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play a crucial role due to their advanced text processing and generation abilities. This study introduces a new strategy aimed at harnessing on-device LLMs in invoking software APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T01:29:28Z)
• API-BLEND: A Comprehensive Corpora for Training and Benchmarking API LLMs [28.840207102132286]
  We focus on the task of identifying, curating, and transforming existing datasets. We introduce API-BLEND, a large corpora for training and systematic testing of tool-augmented LLMs. We demonstrate the utility of the API-BLEND dataset for both training and benchmarking purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:30:49Z)
• ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code [76.84199699772903]
  ML-Bench is a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. To evaluate both Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T12:03:21Z)
• Adaptive REST API Testing with Reinforcement Learning [54.68542517176757]
  Current testing tools lack efficient exploration mechanisms, treating all operations and parameters equally. Current tools struggle when response schemas are absent in the specification or exhibit variants. We present an adaptive REST API testing technique incorporates reinforcement learning to prioritize operations during exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T20:27:05Z)
• ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs [104.37772295581088]
  Open-source large language models (LLMs), e.g., LLaMA, remain significantly limited in tool-use capabilities. We introduce ToolLLM, a general tool-usetuning encompassing data construction, model training, and evaluation. We first present ToolBench, an instruction-tuning framework for tool use, which is constructed automatically using ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T15:56:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.