Responding to Generative AI Technologies with Research-through-Design: The Ryelands AI Lab as an Exploratory Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04677v1
• Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 21:34:10 GMT
• Title: Responding to Generative AI Technologies with Research-through-Design: The Ryelands AI Lab as an Exploratory Study
• Authors: Jesse Josua Benjamin, Joseph Lindley, Elizabeth Edwards, Elisa Rubegni, Tim Korjakow, David Grist, Rhiannon Sharkey,
• Abstract summary: We partner with a primary school to develop a constructionist curriculum centered on students interacting with a generative AI technology. We provide a detailed account of the design of and outputs from the curriculum and learning materials, finding centrally that the reflexive and prolonged hands-on' approach led to a co-development of students' practical and critical competencies.
• Score: 6.028558240668647
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI technologies demand new practical and critical competencies, which call on design to respond to and foster these. We present an exploratory study guided by Research-through-Design, in which we partnered with a primary school to develop a constructionist curriculum centered on students interacting with a generative AI technology. We provide a detailed account of the design of and outputs from the curriculum and learning materials, finding centrally that the reflexive and prolonged `hands-on' approach led to a co-development of students' practical and critical competencies. From the study, we contribute guidance for designing constructionist approaches to generative AI technology education; further arguing to do so with `critical responsivity.' We then discuss how HCI researchers may leverage constructionist strategies in designing interactions with generative AI technologies; and suggest that Research-through-Design can play an important role as a `rapid response methodology' capable of reacting to fast-evolving, disruptive technologies such as generative AI.

Related papers

• Augmenting the Author: Exploring the Potential of AI Collaboration in Academic Writing [25.572926673827165]
  This case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the AI's limitations to ensure responsible and effective AI integration in scholarly work. The paper contributes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction by exploring effective prompt strategies and providing a comparative analysis of Gen AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T19:06:39Z)
• Grasping AI: experiential exercises for designers [8.95562850825636]
  We investigate techniques for exploring and reflecting on the interactional affordances, the unique relational possibilities, and the wider social implications of AI systems. We find that exercises around metaphors and enactments make questions of training and learning, privacy and consent, autonomy and agency more tangible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T15:34:08Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Designing an AI-Driven Talent Intelligence Solution: Exploring Big Data to extend the TOE Framework [0.0]
  This study aims to identify the new requirements for developing AI-oriented artifacts to address talent management issues. A design science method is adopted for conducting the experimental study with structured machine learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T10:42:50Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• Human-Robot Collaboration and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Recent Research [69.48907856390834]
  Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is the approach that explores the interaction between a human and a robot. This paper proposes a thorough literature review of the use of machine learning techniques in the context of HRC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T15:14:33Z)
• Competency Model Approach to AI Literacy: Research-based Path from Initial Framework to Model [0.0]
  Research on AI Literacy could lead to an effective and practical platform for developing these skills. We propose and advocate for a pathway for developing AI Literacy as a pragmatic and useful tool for AI education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-12T15:42:32Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies of Implementation [8.54335661175611]
  We have identified the benefits and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in the education sector. We have also reviewed modern AI technologies for learners and educators, currently available on the software market. We have developed a strategy implementation model, described by a five-stage, generic process, along with the corresponding configuration guide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T11:09:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.