Augmenting the Author: Exploring the Potential of AI Collaboration in Academic Writing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16071v1
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:06:39 GMT
- Title: Augmenting the Author: Exploring the Potential of AI Collaboration in Academic Writing
- Authors: Joseph Tu, Hilda Hadan, Derrick M. Wang, Sabrina A Sgandurra, Reza Hadi Mogavi, Lennart E. Nacke,
- Abstract summary: This case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the AI's limitations to ensure responsible and effective AI integration in scholarly work.
The paper contributes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction by exploring effective prompt strategies and providing a comparative analysis of Gen AI models.
- Score: 25.572926673827165
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This workshop paper presents a critical examination of the integration of Generative AI (Gen AI) into the academic writing process, focusing on the use of AI as a collaborative tool. It contrasts the performance and interaction of two AI models, Gemini and ChatGPT, through a collaborative inquiry approach where researchers engage in facilitated sessions to design prompts that elicit specific AI responses for crafting research outlines. This case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the AI's limitations to ensure responsible and effective AI integration in scholarly work. Preliminary findings suggest that prompt variation significantly affects output quality and reveals distinct capabilities and constraints of each model. The paper contributes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction by exploring effective prompt strategies and providing a comparative analysis of Gen AI models, ultimately aiming to enhance AI-assisted academic writing and prompt a deeper dialogue within the HCI community.
Related papers
- Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies [0.0]
This study examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic research, focusing on its application to qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
GenAI tools evolve rapidly, they offer new possibilities for enhancing research productivity and democratising complex analytical processes.
Their integration into academic practice raises significant questions regarding research integrity and security, authorship, and the changing nature of scholarly work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T13:10:03Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)
It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures.
The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z) - Human-AI Collaboration in Thematic Analysis using ChatGPT: A User Study
and Design Recommendations [0.0]
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers promising potential for advancing human-AI collaboration in qualitative research.
This work delves into researchers' perceptions of their collaboration with GenAI, specifically ChatGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T13:54:56Z) - Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI [0.0]
This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing.
We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T04:35:00Z) - Analyzing Character and Consciousness in AI-Generated Social Content: A
Case Study of Chirper, the AI Social Network [0.0]
The study embarks on a comprehensive exploration of AI behavior, analyzing the effects of diverse settings on Chirper's responses.
Through a series of cognitive tests, the study gauges the self-awareness and pattern recognition prowess of Chirpers.
An intriguing aspect of the research is the exploration of the potential influence of a Chirper's handle or personality type on its performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T15:40:18Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and
Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices.
Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented.
This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.