Artificial intelligence for abnormality detection in high volume neuroimaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05658v1
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 10:12:17 GMT
• Title: Artificial intelligence for abnormality detection in high volume neuroimaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
• Authors: Siddharth Agarwal, David A. Wood, Mariusz Grzeda, Chandhini Suresh, Munaib Din, James Cole, Marc Modat, Thomas C Booth,
• Abstract summary: Most studies evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) models that detect abnormalities in neuroimaging are tested on unrepresentative patient cohorts. The aim was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy and summarise the evidence supporting the use of AI models performing first-line, high-volume neuroimaging tasks.
• Score: 0.5934394862891423
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Purpose: Most studies evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) models that detect abnormalities in neuroimaging are either tested on unrepresentative patient cohorts or are insufficiently well-validated, leading to poor generalisability to real-world tasks. The aim was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy and summarise the evidence supporting the use of AI models performing first-line, high-volume neuroimaging tasks. Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science were searched until September 2021 for studies that temporally or externally validated AI capable of detecting abnormalities in first-line CT or MR neuroimaging. A bivariate random-effects model was used for meta-analysis where appropriate. PROSPERO: CRD42021269563. Results: Only 16 studies were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were not compromised by unrepresentative datasets or inadequate validation methodology. Direct comparison with radiologists was available in 4/16 studies. 15/16 had a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis was only suitable for intracranial haemorrhage detection in CT imaging (10/16 studies), where AI systems had a pooled sensitivity and specificity 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 - 0.94) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.83 - 0.95) respectively. Other AI studies using CT and MRI detected target conditions other than haemorrhage (2/16), or multiple target conditions (4/16). Only 3/16 studies implemented AI in clinical pathways, either for pre-read triage or as post-read discrepancy identifiers. Conclusion: The paucity of eligible studies reflects that most abnormality detection AI studies were not adequately validated in representative clinical cohorts. The few studies describing how abnormality detection AI could impact patients and clinicians did not explore the full ramifications of clinical implementation.

Related papers

• Artificial Intelligence-Based Triaging of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions [0.8864540224289991]
  Pathologists are facing an increasing workload due to a growing volume of cases and the need for more comprehensive diagnoses. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for triaging cutaneous melanocytic lesions based on whole slide images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:49:04Z)
• AI-based Anomaly Detection for Clinical-Grade Histopathological Diagnostics [24.833696455985795]
  In clinical reality, only few diseases are common, whereas the majority of diseases are less frequent. Current AI models overlook or misclassify these diseases. We propose a deep anomaly detection approach that only requires training data from common diseases to detect also all less frequent diseases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T04:59:19Z)
• Methodology and Real-World Applications of Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph for Clinical Diagnosis with Explainability and Invariance [41.373856519548404]
  Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) approach is causality-driven, explainable, and invariant across different application scenarios. 46 DUCG models covering 54 chief complaints were constructed. Over one million real diagnosis cases have been performed, with only 17 incorrect diagnoses identified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T11:37:45Z)
• The Limits of Fair Medical Imaging AI In The Wild [43.97266228706059]
  We investigate the extent to which medical AI utilizes demographic encodings. We confirm that medical imaging AI leverages demographic shortcuts in disease classification. We find that models with less encoding of demographic attributes are often most "globally optimal"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:59:50Z)
• Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis [0.3957768262206625]
  This systematic review and meta-analysis included diagnostic accuracy studies using any type of artificial intelligence applied to whole slide images (WSIs) in any disease type. 100 studies were identified for inclusion, equating to over 152,000 whole slide images (WSIs) and representing many disease types. These studies reported a mean sensitivity of 96.3% (CI 94.1-97.7) and mean specificity of 93.3% (CI 90.5-95.4) for AI. Overall, AI offers good accuracy when applied to WSIs but requires more rigorous evaluation of its performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T00:45:54Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Ovarian Cancer Histopathology: A Systematic Review [1.832300121391956]
  Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and WHO-ICTRP was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. There were 80 models of interest, including 37 diagnostic models, 22 prognostic models, and 21 models with other diagnostically relevant outcomes. All models were found to be at high or unclear risk of bias overall, with most research having a high risk of bias in the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T12:26:29Z)
• Deep-Learning Tool for Early Identifying Non-Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Etiology based on CT Scan [40.51754649947294]
  The deep learning model was developed with 1868 eligible NCCT scans with non-traumatic ICH collected between January 2011 and April 2018. The model's diagnostic performance was compared with clinicians's performance. The clinicians achieve significant improvements in the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnoses of certain hemorrhage etiologies with proposed system augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T08:45:17Z)
• StRegA: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRIs using a Compact Context-encoding Variational Autoencoder [48.2010192865749]
  Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) can learn a data distribution from an unlabelled dataset of healthy subjects and then be applied to detect out of distribution samples. This research proposes a compact version of the "context-encoding" VAE (ceVAE) model, combined with pre and post-processing steps, creating a UAD pipeline (StRegA) The proposed pipeline achieved a Dice score of 0.642$pm$0.101 while detecting tumours in T2w images of the BraTS dataset and 0.859$pm$0.112 while detecting artificially induced anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T14:27:35Z)
• Automatic Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Based on Deep Learning Techniques [111.165389441988]
  This work is to develop a system that automatically detects the presence of the disease in sagittal magnetic resonance images (MRI) Although sagittal-plane MRIs are not commonly used, this work proved that they were, at least, as effective as MRI from other planes at identifying AD in early stages. This study proved that DL models could be built in these fields, whereas TL is an essential tool for completing the task with fewer examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T11:37:57Z)
• CovidDeep: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Test Based on Wearable Medical Sensors and Efficient Neural Networks [51.589769497681175]
  The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a pandemic. The current testing regime based on Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction for SARS-CoV-2 has been unable to keep up with testing demands. We propose a framework called CovidDeep that combines efficient DNNs with commercially available WMSs for pervasive testing of the virus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T21:47:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.