MRISegmentator-Abdomen: A Fully Automated Multi-Organ and Structure Segmentation Tool for T1-weighted Abdominal MRI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05944v2
• Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:05:06 GMT
• Title: MRISegmentator-Abdomen: A Fully Automated Multi-Organ and Structure Segmentation Tool for T1-weighted Abdominal MRI
• Authors: Yan Zhuang, Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Pritam Mukherjee, Brandon Khoury, Boah Kim, Benjamin Hou, Nusrat Rabbee, Abhinav Suri, Ronald M. Summers,
• Abstract summary: There is no publicly available abdominal MRI dataset with voxel-level annotations of multiple organs and structures. A 3D nnUNet model, dubbed as MRISegmentator-Abdomen (MRISegmentator in short), was trained on this dataset. The tool provides automatic, accurate, and robust segmentations of 62 organs and structures in T1-weighted abdominal MRI sequences.
• Score: 12.236789438183138
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Background: Segmentation of organs and structures in abdominal MRI is useful for many clinical applications, such as disease diagnosis and radiotherapy. Current approaches have focused on delineating a limited set of abdominal structures (13 types). To date, there is no publicly available abdominal MRI dataset with voxel-level annotations of multiple organs and structures. Consequently, a segmentation tool for multi-structure segmentation is also unavailable. Methods: We curated a T1-weighted abdominal MRI dataset consisting of 195 patients who underwent imaging at National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. The dataset comprises of axial pre-contrast T1, arterial, venous, and delayed phases for each patient, thereby amounting to a total of 780 series (69,248 2D slices). Each series contains voxel-level annotations of 62 abdominal organs and structures. A 3D nnUNet model, dubbed as MRISegmentator-Abdomen (MRISegmentator in short), was trained on this dataset, and evaluation was conducted on an internal test set and two large external datasets: AMOS22 and Duke Liver. The predicted segmentations were compared against the ground-truth using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Normalized Surface Distance (NSD). Findings: MRISegmentator achieved an average DSC of 0.861$\pm$0.170 and a NSD of 0.924$\pm$0.163 in the internal test set. On the AMOS22 dataset, MRISegmentator attained an average DSC of 0.829$\pm$0.133 and a NSD of 0.908$\pm$0.067. For the Duke Liver dataset, an average DSC of 0.933$\pm$0.015 and a NSD of 0.929$\pm$0.021 was obtained. Interpretation: The proposed MRISegmentator provides automatic, accurate, and robust segmentations of 62 organs and structures in T1-weighted abdominal MRI sequences. The tool has the potential to accelerate research on various clinical topics, such as abnormality detection, radiotherapy, disease classification among others.

Related papers

• SMILE-UHURA Challenge -- Small Vessel Segmentation at Mesoscopic Scale from Ultra-High Resolution 7T Magnetic Resonance Angiograms [60.35639972035727]
  The lack of publicly available annotated datasets has impeded the development of robust, machine learning-driven segmentation algorithms. The SMILE-UHURA challenge addresses the gap in publicly available annotated datasets by providing an annotated dataset of Time-of-Flight angiography acquired with 7T MRI. Dice scores reached up to 0.838 $pm$ 0.066 and 0.716 $pm$ 0.125 on the respective datasets, with an average performance of up to 0.804 $pm$ 0.15.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T17:06:00Z)
• Zero-shot 3D Segmentation of Abdominal Organs in CT Scans Using Segment Anything Model 2 [0.4477747148398817]
  We used a subset of the TotalSegmentator CT dataset from eight institutions to assess SAM 2's ability to segment eight abdominal organs. Performance was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and "negative prompts" were analyzed. As a zero-shot approach, larger organs with clear boundaries demonstrated high segmentation performance, with mean DSCs as follows: liver 0.821 pm 0.192, right kidney 0.862 pm 0.212, left kidney 0.870 pm 0.154, and spleen 0.891 pm 0.131.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T14:16:10Z)
• TotalSegmentator MRI: Sequence-Independent Segmentation of 59 Anatomical Structures in MR images [62.53931644063323]
  In this study we extended the capabilities of TotalSegmentator to MR images. We trained an nnU-Net segmentation algorithm on this dataset and calculated similarity coefficients (Dice) to evaluate the model's performance. The model significantly outperformed two other publicly available segmentation models (Dice score 0.824 versus 0.762; p0.001 and 0.762 versus 0.542; p)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T20:15:54Z)
• MRSegmentator: Multi-Modality Segmentation of 40 Classes in MRI and CT [29.48170108608303]
  The model was trained on 1,200 manually annotated 3D axial MRI scans from the UK Biobank, 221 in-house MRI scans, and 1228 CT scans. It demonstrated high accuracy for well-defined organs (lungs: DSC 0.96, heart: DSC 0.94) and organs with anatomic variability (liver: DSC 0.96, kidneys: DSC 0.95) It generalized well to CT, achieving DSC mean of 0.84 $pm$ 0.11 on AMOS CT data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T13:15:42Z)
• Minimally Interactive Segmentation of Soft-Tissue Tumors on CT and MRI using Deep Learning [0.0]
  We develop a minimally interactive deep learning-based segmentation method for soft-tissue tumors (STTs) on CT and MRI. The method requires the user to click six points near the tumor's extreme boundaries to serve as input for a Convolutional Neural Network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:28Z)
• Accurate Fine-Grained Segmentation of Human Anatomy in Radiographs via Volumetric Pseudo-Labeling [66.75096111651062]
  We created a large-scale dataset of 10,021 thoracic CTs with 157 labels. We applied an ensemble of 3D anatomy segmentation models to extract anatomical pseudo-labels. Our resulting segmentation models demonstrated remarkable performance on CXR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T18:01:08Z)
• Multimodal CNN Networks for Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI: A BraTS 2022 Challenge Solution [0.0]
  This paper describes our contribution to the BraTS 2022 Continuous Evaluation challenge. We propose a new ensemble of multiple deep learning frameworks namely, DeepSeg, nnU-Net, and DeepSCAN for automatic glioma boundaries detection in pre-operative MRI. It is worth noting that our ensemble models took first place in the final evaluation on the BraTS testing dataset with Dice scores of 0.9294, 0.8788, and 0.8803, and Hausdorf distance of 5.23, 13.54, and 12.05, for the whole tumor, tumor core, and enhancing tumor, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T09:14:23Z)
• TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT images [48.50994220135258]
  We present a deep learning segmentation model for body CT images. The model can segment 104 anatomical structures relevant for use cases such as organ volumetry, disease characterization, and surgical or radiotherapy planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T15:16:40Z)
• Weakly-supervised Biomechanically-constrained CT/MRI Registration of the Spine [72.85011943179894]
  We propose a weakly-supervised deep learning framework that preserves the rigidity and the volume of each vertebra while maximizing the accuracy of the registration. We specifically design these losses to depend only on the CT label maps since automatic vertebra segmentation in CT gives more accurate results contrary to MRI. Our results show that adding the anatomy-aware losses increases the plausibility of the inferred transformation while keeping the accuracy untouched.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T10:59:55Z)
• Segmentation of the Myocardium on Late-Gadolinium Enhanced MRI based on 2.5 D Residual Squeeze and Excitation Deep Learning Model [55.09533240649176]
  The aim of this work is to develop an accurate automatic segmentation method based on deep learning models for the myocardial borders on LGE-MRI. A total number of 320 exams (with a mean number of 6 slices per exam) were used for training and 28 exams used for testing. The performance analysis of the proposed ensemble model in the basal and middle slices was similar as compared to intra-observer study and slightly lower at apical slices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T20:44:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.