Science based AI model certification for new operational environments with application in traffic state estimation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07893v1
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:28:00 GMT
- Title: Science based AI model certification for new operational environments with application in traffic state estimation
- Authors: Daryl Mupupuni, Anupama Guntu, Liang Hong, Kamrul Hasan, Leehyun Keel,
- Abstract summary: The expanding role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diverse engineering domains highlights the challenges associated with deploying AI models in new operational environments.
This paper proposes a science-based certification methodology to assess the viability of employing pre-trained data-driven models in new operational environments.
- Score: 1.2186759689780324
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The expanding role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diverse engineering domains highlights the challenges associated with deploying AI models in new operational environments, involving substantial investments in data collection and model training. Rapid application of AI necessitates evaluating the feasibility of utilizing pre-trained models in unobserved operational settings with minimal or no additional data. However, interpreting the opaque nature of AI's black-box models remains a persistent challenge. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a science-based certification methodology to assess the viability of employing pre-trained data-driven models in new operational environments. The methodology advocates a profound integration of domain knowledge, leveraging theoretical and analytical models from physics and related disciplines, with data-driven AI models. This novel approach introduces tools to facilitate the development of secure engineering systems, providing decision-makers with confidence in the trustworthiness and safety of AI-based models across diverse environments characterized by limited training data and dynamic, uncertain conditions. The paper demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology in real-world safety-critical scenarios, particularly in the context of traffic state estimation. Through simulation results, the study illustrates how the proposed methodology efficiently quantifies physical inconsistencies exhibited by pre-trained AI models. By utilizing analytical models, the methodology offers a means to gauge the applicability of pre-trained AI models in new operational environments. This research contributes to advancing the understanding and deployment of AI models, offering a robust certification framework that enhances confidence in their reliability and safety across a spectrum of operational conditions.
Related papers
- Model Developmental Safety: A Safety-Centric Method and Applications in Vision-Language Models [75.8161094916476]
We study how to develop a pretrained vision-language model (aka the CLIP model) for acquiring new capabilities or improving existing capabilities of image classification.
Our experiments on improving vision perception capabilities on autonomous driving and scene recognition datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T22:34:58Z) - Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment.
To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z) - Science based AI model certification for untrained operational environments with application in traffic state estimation [1.2186759689780324]
The expanding role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diverse engineering domains highlights the challenges associated with deploying AI models in new operational environments.
This paper proposes a science-based certification methodology to assess the viability of employing pre-trained data-driven models in untrained operational environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T03:01:25Z) - Data Quality Aware Approaches for Addressing Model Drift of Semantic
Segmentation Models [1.6385815610837167]
This study investigates two prominent quality aware strategies to combat model drift.
The former leverages image quality assessment metrics to meticulously select high-quality training data, improving the model robustness.
The latter makes use of learned vectors feature from existing models to guide the selection of future data, aligning it with the model's prior knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-11T18:01:52Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in Large Language Models: a comprehensive review [1.6006550105523192]
Review explores the pivotal role of prompt engineering in unleashing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Examines both foundational and advanced methodologies of prompt engineering, including techniques such as self-consistency, chain-of-thought, and generated knowledge.
Review also reflects the essential role of prompt engineering in advancing AI capabilities, providing a structured framework for future research and application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T09:15:18Z) - DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled
Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models.
Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Application to
Autonomous Driving [2.3303341607459687]
We propose a novel uncertainty-aware model-based reinforcement learning framework, and then implement and validate it in autonomous driving.
The framework is developed based on the adaptive truncation approach, providing virtual interactions between the agent and environment model.
The developed algorithms are then implemented in end-to-end autonomous vehicle control tasks, validated and compared with state-of-the-art methods under various driving scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-23T06:55:14Z) - Evaluating the Safety of Deep Reinforcement Learning Models using
Semi-Formal Verification [81.32981236437395]
We present a semi-formal verification approach for decision-making tasks based on interval analysis.
Our method obtains comparable results over standard benchmarks with respect to formal verifiers.
Our approach allows to efficiently evaluate safety properties for decision-making models in practical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T11:18:06Z) - Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters [105.43098326577434]
One of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model and that of the downstream planner or policy.
We propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space.
We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T16:42:59Z) - Developing and Operating Artificial Intelligence Models in Trustworthy
Autonomous Systems [8.27310353898034]
This work-in-progress paper aims to close the gap between the development and operation of AI-based AS.
We propose a novel, holistic DevOps approach to put it into practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-11T17:52:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.