Is Less More? Quality, Quantity and Context in Idiom Processing with Natural Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08497v1
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 10:54:20 GMT
- Title: Is Less More? Quality, Quantity and Context in Idiom Processing with Natural Language Models
- Authors: Agne Knietaite, Adam Allsebrook, Anton Minkov, Adam Tomaszewski, Norbert Slinko, Richard Johnson, Thomas Pickard, Dylan Phelps, Aline Villavicencio,
- Abstract summary: We present datasets created by substitution of synonyms of potentially idiomatic English noun compounds in public domain book texts.
Performance on an idiomaticity detection task indicates that dataset quality is a stronger factor for context-enriched models, but that quantity also plays a role in models without context inclusion strategies.
- Score: 1.7563410381304443
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Compositionality in language models presents a problem when processing idiomatic expressions, as their meaning often cannot be directly derived from their individual parts. Although fine-tuning and other optimization strategies can be used to improve representations of idiomatic expressions, this depends on the availability of relevant data. We present the Noun Compound Synonym Substitution in Books - NCSSB - datasets, which are created by substitution of synonyms of potentially idiomatic English noun compounds in public domain book texts. We explore the trade-off between data quantity and quality when training models for idiomaticity detection, in conjunction with contextual information obtained locally (from the surrounding sentences) or externally (through language resources). Performance on an idiomaticity detection task indicates that dataset quality is a stronger factor for context-enriched models, but that quantity also plays a role in models without context inclusion strategies.
Related papers
- Investigating Idiomaticity in Word Representations [9.208145117062339]
We focus on noun compounds of varying levels of idiomaticity in two languages (English and Portuguese)
We present a dataset of minimal pairs containing human idiomaticity judgments for each noun compound at both type and token levels.
We define a set of fine-grained metrics of Affinity and Scaled Similarity to determine how sensitive the models are to perturbations that may lead to changes in idiomaticity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T21:05:01Z) - Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing.
We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM.
We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z) - Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings.
An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts)
This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z) - Reference-less Analysis of Context Specificity in Translation with
Personalised Language Models [3.527589066359829]
This work investigates what extent rich character and film annotations can be leveraged to personalise language models (LMs)
We build LMs which leverage rich contextual information to reduce perplexity by up to 6.5% compared to a non-contextual model.
Our results suggest that the degree to which professional translations in our domain are context-specific can be preserved to a better extent by a contextual machine translation model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-29T12:19:23Z) - Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context [29.315230178997002]
We investigate how the model problem-solving accuracy can be influenced by irrelevant context.
We use benchmark to measure the distractibility of cutting-edge prompting techniques for large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-31T20:48:57Z) - Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions.
Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z) - An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with
Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models.
We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z) - Cross-lingual Text Classification with Heterogeneous Graph Neural
Network [2.6936806968297913]
Cross-lingual text classification aims at training a classifier on the source language and transferring the knowledge to target languages.
Recent multilingual pretrained language models (mPLM) achieve impressive results in cross-lingual classification tasks.
We propose a simple yet effective method to incorporate heterogeneous information within and across languages for cross-lingual text classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-24T12:45:42Z) - Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for
Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict.
This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data.
Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z) - Grounded Compositional Outputs for Adaptive Language Modeling [59.02706635250856]
A language model's vocabulary$-$typically selected before training and permanently fixed later$-$affects its size.
We propose a fully compositional output embedding layer for language models.
To our knowledge, the result is the first word-level language model with a size that does not depend on the training vocabulary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-24T07:21:14Z) - Probing Linguistic Features of Sentence-Level Representations in Neural
Relation Extraction [80.38130122127882]
We introduce 14 probing tasks targeting linguistic properties relevant to neural relation extraction (RE)
We use them to study representations learned by more than 40 different encoder architecture and linguistic feature combinations trained on two datasets.
We find that the bias induced by the architecture and the inclusion of linguistic features are clearly expressed in the probing task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T09:17:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.