A Comprehensive Evaluation of Histopathology Foundation Models for Ovarian Cancer Subtype Classification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09990v2
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:59:57 GMT
- Title: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Histopathology Foundation Models for Ovarian Cancer Subtype Classification
- Authors: Jack Breen, Katie Allen, Kieran Zucker, Lucy Godson, Nicolas M. Orsi, Nishant Ravikumar,
- Abstract summary: Histopathology foundation models show great promise across many tasks.
We report the most rigorous single-task validation of histopathology foundation models to date.
Histopathology foundation models offer a clear benefit to ovarian cancer subtyping.
- Score: 1.9499122087408571
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large pretrained transformers are increasingly being developed as generalised foundation models which can underpin powerful task-specific artificial intelligence models. Histopathology foundation models show great promise across many tasks, but analyses have typically been limited by arbitrary hyperparameters that were not tuned to the specific task. We report the most rigorous single-task validation of histopathology foundation models to date, specifically in ovarian cancer morphological subtyping. Attention-based multiple instance learning classifiers were compared using three ImageNet-pretrained feature extractors and fourteen histopathology foundation models. The training set consisted of 1864 whole slide images from 434 ovarian carcinoma cases at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Five-class classification performance was evaluated through five-fold cross-validation, and these cross-validation models were ensembled for hold-out testing and external validation on the Transcanadian Study and OCEAN Challenge datasets. The best-performing model used the H-optimus-0 foundation model, with five-class balanced accuracies of 89%, 97%, and 74% in the test sets. Normalisations and augmentations aided the performance of the ImageNet-pretrained ResNets, but these were still outperformed by 13 of the 14 foundation models. Hyperparameter tuning the downstream classifiers improved performance by a median 1.9% balanced accuracy, with many improvements being statistically significant. Histopathology foundation models offer a clear benefit to ovarian cancer subtyping, improving classification performance to a degree where clinical utility is tangible, albeit with an increased computational burden. Such models could provide a second opinion to histopathologists diagnosing challenging cases and may improve the accuracy, objectivity, and efficiency of pathological diagnoses overall.
Related papers
- Comparative Analysis of Transfer Learning Models for Breast Cancer Classification [10.677937909900486]
This study investigates the efficiency of deep learning models in distinguishing between Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) and non-IDC in histopathology slides.
We conducted a comparison examination of eight sophisticated models: ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, ResNeXt-50, Vision Transformer (ViT), GoogLeNet (Inception v3), EfficientNet, MobileNet, and SqueezeNet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T18:49:32Z) - Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology [0.6151041580858937]
We benchmarked ten histopathology foundation models on 13 patient cohorts with 6,791 patients and 9,493 slides from lung, colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers.
We show that a vision-language foundation model, CONCH, yielded the highest performance in 42% of tasks when compared to vision-only foundation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T14:34:45Z) - Comparative Performance Analysis of Transformer-Based Pre-Trained Models for Detecting Keratoconus Disease [0.0]
This study compares eight pre-trained CNNs for diagnosing keratoconus, a degenerative eye disease.
MobileNetV2 was the best accurate model in identifying keratoconus and normal cases with few misclassifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T20:15:24Z) - Multi-Resolution Histopathology Patch Graphs for Ovarian Cancer Subtyping [2.0661578265672094]
Multi-resolution graph models leverage the spatial relationships of patches at multiple magnifications, learning the context for each patch.
We conduct the most thorough validation of a graph model for ovarian cancer subtyping to date.
The accuracy of the combined foundation model and multi-resolution graph network offers a step towards the clinical applicability of these models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-25T15:08:54Z) - Transformer-Based Self-Supervised Learning for Histopathological Classification of Ischemic Stroke Clot Origin [0.0]
Identifying the thromboembolism source in ischemic stroke is crucial for treatment and secondary prevention.
This study describes a self-supervised deep learning approach in digital pathology of emboli for classifying ischemic stroke clot origin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T23:40:12Z) - Towards a clinically accessible radiology foundation model: open-access and lightweight, with automated evaluation [113.5002649181103]
Training open-source small multimodal models (SMMs) to bridge competency gaps for unmet clinical needs in radiology.
For training, we assemble a large dataset of over 697 thousand radiology image-text pairs.
For evaluation, we propose CheXprompt, a GPT-4-based metric for factuality evaluation, and demonstrate its parity with expert evaluation.
The inference of LlaVA-Rad is fast and can be performed on a single V100 GPU in private settings, offering a promising state-of-the-art tool for real-world clinical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T18:12:02Z) - Significantly improving zero-shot X-ray pathology classification via fine-tuning pre-trained image-text encoders [50.689585476660554]
We propose a new fine-tuning strategy that includes positive-pair loss relaxation and random sentence sampling.
Our approach consistently improves overall zero-shot pathology classification across four chest X-ray datasets and three pre-trained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-14T06:04:18Z) - Multi-Domain Balanced Sampling Improves Out-of-Distribution
Generalization of Chest X-ray Pathology Prediction Models [67.2867506736665]
We propose an idea for out-of-distribution generalization of chest X-ray pathologies that uses a simple balanced batch sampling technique.
We observed that balanced sampling between the multiple training datasets improves the performance over baseline models trained without balancing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-27T15:28:01Z) - A multi-stage machine learning model on diagnosis of esophageal
manometry [50.591267188664666]
The framework includes deep-learning models at the swallow-level stage and feature-based machine learning models at the study-level stage.
This is the first artificial-intelligence-style model to automatically predict CC diagnosis of HRM study from raw multi-swallow data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T20:09:23Z) - Many-to-One Distribution Learning and K-Nearest Neighbor Smoothing for
Thoracic Disease Identification [83.6017225363714]
deep learning has become the most powerful computer-aided diagnosis technology for improving disease identification performance.
For chest X-ray imaging, annotating large-scale data requires professional domain knowledge and is time-consuming.
In this paper, we propose many-to-one distribution learning (MODL) and K-nearest neighbor smoothing (KNNS) methods to improve a single model's disease identification performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T02:29:30Z) - Predicting Clinical Diagnosis from Patients Electronic Health Records
Using BERT-based Neural Networks [62.9447303059342]
We show the importance of this problem in medical community.
We present a modification of Bidirectional Representations from Transformers (BERT) model for classification sequence.
We use a large-scale Russian EHR dataset consisting of about 4 million unique patient visits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-15T09:22:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.