Can Public LLMs be used for Self-Diagnosis of Medical Conditions ?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11407v2
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:12:11 GMT
- Title: Can Public LLMs be used for Self-Diagnosis of Medical Conditions ?
- Authors: Nikil Sharan Prabahar Balasubramanian, Sagnik Dakshit,
- Abstract summary: The development of Large Language Models (LLM) has evolved as a transformative paradigm in conversational tasks.
The widespread integration of Gemini with Google search and GPT-4.0 with Bing search has led to a shift in the trend of self-diagnosis.
We compare the performance of both the state-of-the-art GPT-4.0 and the fee Gemini model on the task of self-diagnosis.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Advancements in deep learning have generated a large-scale interest in the development of foundational deep learning models. The development of Large Language Models (LLM) has evolved as a transformative paradigm in conversational tasks, which has led to its integration and extension even in the critical domain of healthcare. With LLMs becoming widely popular and their public access through open-source models and integration with other applications, there is a need to investigate their potential and limitations. One such crucial task where LLMs are applied but require a deeper understanding is that of self-diagnosis of medical conditions based on bias-validating symptoms in the interest of public health. The widespread integration of Gemini with Google search and GPT-4.0 with Bing search has led to a shift in the trend of self-diagnosis using search engines to conversational LLM models. Owing to the critical nature of the task, it is prudent to investigate and understand the potential and limitations of public LLMs in the task of self-diagnosis. In this study, we prepare a prompt engineered dataset of 10000 samples and test the performance on the general task of self-diagnosis. We compared the performance of both the state-of-the-art GPT-4.0 and the fee Gemini model on the task of self-diagnosis and recorded contrasting accuracies of 63.07% and 6.01%, respectively. We also discuss the challenges, limitations, and potential of both Gemini and GPT-4.0 for the task of self-diagnosis to facilitate future research and towards the broader impact of general public knowledge. Furthermore, we demonstrate the potential and improvement in performance for the task of self-diagnosis using Retrieval Augmented Generation.
Related papers
- Open Foundation Models in Healthcare: Challenges, Paradoxes, and Opportunities with GenAI Driven Personalized Prescription [3.9083860193371938]
In response to the success of proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's GPT-4, there is a growing interest in developing open, non-proprietary AI foundation models (AIFMs)
Despite their inability to match the refined functionalities of their proprietary counterparts, open models hold immense potential to revolutionize healthcare applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T19:16:56Z) - Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models in Scientific Claim Detection and Classification [0.0]
This study evaluates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) as innovative solutions for mitigating misinformation on platforms like Twitter.
LLMs offer a pre-trained, adaptable approach that bypasses the extensive training and overfitting issues associated with traditional machine learning models.
We present a comparative analysis of LLMs' performance using a specialized dataset and propose a framework for their application in public health communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-21T05:02:26Z) - GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals.
GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date.
It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z) - Digital Diagnostics: The Potential Of Large Language Models In Recognizing Symptoms Of Common Illnesses [0.2995925627097048]
This study evaluates each model diagnostic abilities by interpreting a user symptoms and determining diagnoses that fit well with common illnesses.
GPT-4 demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy from its deep and complete history of training on medical data.
Gemini performs with high precision as a critical tool in disease triage, demonstrating its potential to be a reliable model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T15:12:24Z) - Large Language Model Distilling Medication Recommendation Model [58.94186280631342]
We harness the powerful semantic comprehension and input-agnostic characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our research aims to transform existing medication recommendation methodologies using LLMs.
To mitigate this, we have developed a feature-level knowledge distillation technique, which transfers the LLM's proficiency to a more compact model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T08:25:22Z) - Natural Language Programming in Medicine: Administering Evidence Based Clinical Workflows with Autonomous Agents Powered by Generative Large Language Models [29.05425041393475]
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise in healthcare.
This study assessed the potential of LLMs to function as autonomous agents in a simulated tertiary care medical center.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-05T15:09:57Z) - Distilling Large Language Models for Matching Patients to Clinical
Trials [3.4068841624198942]
The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has paved the way for their adoption in the high-stakes domain of healthcare.
This study presents the first systematic examination of the efficacy of both proprietary (GPT-3.5, and GPT-4) and open-source LLMs (LLAMA 7B,13B, and 70B) for the task of patient-trial matching.
Our findings reveal that open-source LLMs, when fine-tuned on this limited and synthetic dataset, demonstrate performance parity with their proprietary counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T17:11:07Z) - Revisiting the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models [62.57981196992073]
This study aims to determine the reliability of applying personality assessments to Large Language Models.
Analysis of 2,500 settings per model, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini-Pro, and LLaMA-3.1, reveals that various LLMs show consistency in responses to the Big Five Inventory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T15:03:28Z) - Privacy-preserving machine learning for healthcare: open challenges and
future perspectives [72.43506759789861]
We conduct a review of recent literature concerning Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML) for healthcare.
We primarily focus on privacy-preserving training and inference-as-a-service.
The aim of this review is to guide the development of private and efficient ML models in healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-27T19:20:51Z) - Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection [98.5549882883963]
We present findings from the largest Federated ML study to-date, involving data from 71 healthcare institutions across 6 continents.
We generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma.
We demonstrate a 33% improvement over a publicly trained model to delineate the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% improvement over the tumor's entire extent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T17:27:00Z) - MIMO: Mutual Integration of Patient Journey and Medical Ontology for
Healthcare Representation Learning [49.57261599776167]
We propose an end-to-end robust Transformer-based solution, Mutual Integration of patient journey and Medical Ontology (MIMO) for healthcare representation learning and predictive analytics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-20T07:04:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.