Exploring Teachers' Perception of Artificial Intelligence: The Socio-emotional Deficiency as Opportunities and Challenges in Human-AI Complementarity in K-12 Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13065v1
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:43:04 GMT
- Title: Exploring Teachers' Perception of Artificial Intelligence: The Socio-emotional Deficiency as Opportunities and Challenges in Human-AI Complementarity in K-12 Education
- Authors: Soon-young Oh, Yongsu Ahn,
- Abstract summary: In schools, teachers play a multitude of roles, serving as educators, counselors, decision-makers, and members of the school community.
With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), there is increasing discussion about how AI can assist, complement, and collaborate with teachers.
Our study seeks educators' perspectives on the potential strengths and limitations of AI across a spectrum of responsibilities.
- Score: 1.9797215742507548
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In schools, teachers play a multitude of roles, serving as educators, counselors, decision-makers, and members of the school community. With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), there is increasing discussion about how AI can assist, complement, and collaborate with teachers. To pave the way for better teacher-AI complementary relationships in schools, our study aims to expand the discourse on teacher-AI complementarity by seeking educators' perspectives on the potential strengths and limitations of AI across a spectrum of responsibilities. Through a mixed method using a survey with 100 elementary school teachers in South Korea and in-depth interviews with 12 teachers, our findings indicate that teachers anticipate AI's potential to complement human teachers by automating administrative tasks and enhancing personalized learning through advanced intelligence. Interestingly, the deficit of AI's socio-emotional capabilities has been perceived as both challenges and opportunities. Overall, our study demonstrates the nuanced perception of teachers and different levels of expectations over their roles, challenging the need for decisions about AI adoption tailored to educators' preferences and concerns.
Related papers
- "From Unseen Needs to Classroom Solutions": Exploring AI Literacy Challenges & Opportunities with Project-based Learning Toolkit in K-12 Education [0.3994567502796064]
There is a growing need to equip K-12 students with AI literacy skills that extend beyond computer science.
This paper explores the integration of a Project-Based Learning (PBL) AI toolkit into diverse subject areas, aimed at helping educators teach AI concepts more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T03:31:02Z) - Who is Helping Whom? Student Concerns about AI- Teacher Collaboration in Higher Education Classrooms [8.888004194396643]
This paper aims to understand how students perceive the implications of AI in Education in terms of classroom collaborative dynamics.
We analyzed narratives from 65 participants, highlighting three challenges: AI decontextualizing of the educational context; AI-teacher cooperation with bias concerns and power disparities.
We argue that for effective and ethical AI-facilitated cooperative education, future AIEd design must factor in the situated nature of implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-19T02:35:01Z) - Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.
The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.
These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z) - The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in
Higher Education? [0.0]
The study provides a comprehensive perspective on the future role of educators in the face of AI technologies.
Participants argue that human teachers possess unique qualities, such as critical thinking, creativity, and emotions, which make them irreplaceable.
The research proposes that teachers can effectively integrate AI to enhance teaching and learning without viewing it as a replacement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T03:39:34Z) - An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence
Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Designing for human-AI complementarity in K-12 education [2.741266294612776]
We present the iterative design and evaluation of Lumilo, smart glasses that help teachers help their students in AI-supported classrooms.
Results from a field study conducted in K-12 classrooms indicate that students learn more when teachers and AI tutors work together.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-02T22:38:50Z) - Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal.
In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z) - Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education.
A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum.
The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z) - Engaging Teachers to Co-Design Integrated AI Curriculum for K-12
Classrooms [11.726528038065764]
We organized co-design workshops with 15 K-12 teachers to identify opportunities to integrate AI education into core curriculum.
We found that K-12 teachers need additional scaffolding in the curriculum to facilitate ethics and data discussions.
We present an exemplar lesson plan that shows entry points for teaching AI in non-computing subjects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T00:56:41Z) - Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local
Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting.
Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.