The Vital Role of Gradient Clipping in Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14432v4
• Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:04:01 GMT
• Title: The Vital Role of Gradient Clipping in Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Learning
• Authors: Youssef Allouah, Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Ahmed Jellouli, Geovani Rizk, John Stephan,
• Abstract summary: Byzantine-resilient distributed machine learning seeks to achieve robust learning performance in the presence of misbehaving or adversarial workers. While state-of-the-art (SOTA) robust distributed gradient descent (DGD) methods were proven theoretically optimal, their empirical success has often relied on pre-aggregation gradient clipping. We propose a principled adaptive clipping strategy, termed Adaptive Robust ClippingARC, to improve robustness against some attacks while being ineffective or detrimental against others.
• Score: 8.268485501864939
• License:
• Abstract: Byzantine-resilient distributed machine learning seeks to achieve robust learning performance in the presence of misbehaving or adversarial workers. While state-of-the-art (SOTA) robust distributed gradient descent (Robust-DGD) methods were proven theoretically optimal, their empirical success has often relied on pre-aggregation gradient clipping. However, the currently considered static clipping strategy exhibits mixed results: improving robustness against some attacks while being ineffective or detrimental against others. We address this gap by proposing a principled adaptive clipping strategy, termed Adaptive Robust Clipping (ARC). We show that ARC consistently enhances the empirical robustness of SOTA Robust-DGD methods, while preserving the theoretical robustness guarantees. Our analysis shows that ARC provably improves the asymptotic convergence guarantee of Robust-DGD in the case when the model is well-initialized. We validate this theoretical insight through an exhaustive set of experiments on benchmark image classification tasks. We observe that the improvement induced by ARC is more pronounced in highly heterogeneous and adversarial settings.

Related papers

• Boosting Certificate Robustness for Time Series Classification with Efficient Self-Ensemble [10.63844868166531]
  Randomized Smoothing has emerged as a standout method due to its ability to certify a provable lower bound on robustness radius under $ell_p$-ball attacks. We propose a self-ensemble method to enhance the lower bound of the probability confidence of predicted labels by reducing the variance of classification margins. This approach also addresses the computational overhead issue of Deep Ensemble(DE) while remaining competitive and, in some cases, outperforming it in terms of robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T15:22:08Z)
• Perturbation-Invariant Adversarial Training for Neural Ranking Models: Improving the Effectiveness-Robustness Trade-Off [107.35833747750446]
  adversarial examples can be crafted by adding imperceptible perturbations to legitimate documents. This vulnerability raises significant concerns about their reliability and hinders the widespread deployment of NRMs. In this study, we establish theoretical guarantees regarding the effectiveness-robustness trade-off in NRMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T05:38:39Z)
• Learn from the Past: A Proxy Guided Adversarial Defense Framework with Self Distillation Regularization [53.04697800214848]
  Adversarial Training (AT) is pivotal in fortifying the robustness of deep learning models. AT methods, relying on direct iterative updates for target model's defense, frequently encounter obstacles such as unstable training and catastrophic overfitting. We present a general proxy guided defense framework, LAST' (bf Learn from the Pbf ast)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T13:13:41Z)
• Doubly Robust Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Training [107.40683655362285]
  We propose a novel doubly-robust instance reweighted adversarial framework. Our importance weights are obtained by optimizing the KL-divergence regularized loss function. Our proposed approach outperforms related state-of-the-art baseline methods in terms of average robust performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T06:16:18Z)
• Provable Guarantees for Generative Behavior Cloning: Bridging Low-Level Stability and High-Level Behavior [51.60683890503293]
  We propose a theoretical framework for studying behavior cloning of complex expert demonstrations using generative modeling. We show that pure supervised cloning can generate trajectories matching the per-time step distribution of arbitrary expert trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T04:27:26Z)
• Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learning [109.90239627115336]
  We study the provable robustness of reinforcement learning against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations of the inputs. We generate certificates that guarantee that the total reward obtained by the smoothed policy will not fall below a certain threshold under a norm-bounded adversarial of perturbation the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T21:42:08Z)
• Stratified Learning: A General-Purpose Statistical Method for Improved Learning under Covariate Shift [1.1470070927586016]
  We propose a simple, statistically principled, and theoretically justified method to improve supervised learning when the training set is not representative. We build upon a well-established methodology in causal inference, and show that the effects of covariate shift can be reduced or eliminated by conditioning on propensity scores. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our general-purpose method on two contemporary research questions in cosmology, outperforming state-of-the-art importance weighting methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T15:53:20Z)
• CROP: Certifying Robust Policies for Reinforcement Learning through Functional Smoothing [41.093241772796475]
  We present the first framework of Certifying Robust Policies for reinforcement learning (CROP) against adversarial state perturbations. We propose two types of robustness certification criteria: robustness of per-state actions and lower bound of cumulative rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T07:58:32Z)
• Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
  We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function. It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.