Certifying Adapters: Enabling and Enhancing the Certification of Classifier Adversarial Robustness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16036v1
- Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 03:18:52 GMT
- Title: Certifying Adapters: Enabling and Enhancing the Certification of Classifier Adversarial Robustness
- Authors: Jieren Deng, Hanbin Hong, Aaron Palmer, Xin Zhou, Jinbo Bi, Kaleel Mahmood, Yuan Hong, Derek Aguiar,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel certifying adapters framework (CAF) that enables and enhances the certification of adversarial robustness.
CAF achieves improved certified accuracies when compared to methods based on random or denoised smoothing.
An ensemble of adapters enables a single pre-trained feature extractor to defend against a range of noise perturbation scales.
- Score: 21.394217131341932
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Randomized smoothing has become a leading method for achieving certified robustness in deep classifiers against l_{p}-norm adversarial perturbations. Current approaches for achieving certified robustness, such as data augmentation with Gaussian noise and adversarial training, require expensive training procedures that tune large models for different Gaussian noise levels and thus cannot leverage high-performance pre-trained neural networks. In this work, we introduce a novel certifying adapters framework (CAF) that enables and enhances the certification of classifier adversarial robustness. Our approach makes few assumptions about the underlying training algorithm or feature extractor and is thus broadly applicable to different feature extractor architectures (e.g., convolutional neural networks or vision transformers) and smoothing algorithms. We show that CAF (a) enables certification in uncertified models pre-trained on clean datasets and (b) substantially improves the performance of certified classifiers via randomized smoothing and SmoothAdv at multiple radii in CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. We demonstrate that CAF achieves improved certified accuracies when compared to methods based on random or denoised smoothing, and that CAF is insensitive to certifying adapter hyperparameters. Finally, we show that an ensemble of adapters enables a single pre-trained feature extractor to defend against a range of noise perturbation scales.
Related papers
- Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing [87.48628403354351]
certification for machine learning is proving that no adversarial sample can evade a model within a range under certain conditions.
Common certification methods for segmentation use a flat set of fine-grained classes, leading to high abstain rates due to model uncertainty.
We propose a novel, more practical setting, which certifies pixels within a multi-level hierarchy, and adaptively relaxes the certification to a coarser level for unstable components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T11:59:43Z) - The Lipschitz-Variance-Margin Tradeoff for Enhanced Randomized Smoothing [85.85160896547698]
Real-life applications of deep neural networks are hindered by their unsteady predictions when faced with noisy inputs and adversarial attacks.
We show how to design an efficient classifier with a certified radius by relying on noise injection into the inputs.
Our novel certification procedure allows us to use pre-trained models with randomized smoothing, effectively improving the current certification radius in a zero-shot manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T22:41:47Z) - Confidence-aware Training of Smoothed Classifiers for Certified
Robustness [75.95332266383417]
We use "accuracy under Gaussian noise" as an easy-to-compute proxy of adversarial robustness for an input.
Our experiments show that the proposed method consistently exhibits improved certified robustness upon state-of-the-art training methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-18T03:57:12Z) - Smooth-Reduce: Leveraging Patches for Improved Certified Robustness [100.28947222215463]
We propose a training-free, modified smoothing approach, Smooth-Reduce.
Our algorithm classifies overlapping patches extracted from an input image, and aggregates the predicted logits to certify a larger radius around the input.
We provide theoretical guarantees for such certificates, and empirically show significant improvements over other randomized smoothing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-12T15:26:20Z) - Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learning [64.96088324684683]
We propose textitPrototypical, which does not require fitting additional parameters given the embedding network.
Prototypical produces balanced and comparable predictions for all classes even though the training set is class-imbalanced.
We test our method on CIFAR-10LT, CIFAR-100LT and Webvision datasets, observing that Prototypical obtains substaintial improvements compared with state of the arts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T01:55:01Z) - Certified Distributional Robustness on Smoothed Classifiers [27.006844966157317]
We propose the worst-case adversarial loss over input distributions as a robustness certificate.
By exploiting duality and the smoothness property, we provide an easy-to-compute upper bound as a surrogate for the certificate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-21T13:22:25Z) - Consistency Regularization for Certified Robustness of Smoothed
Classifiers [89.72878906950208]
A recent technique of randomized smoothing has shown that the worst-case $ell$-robustness can be transformed into the average-case robustness.
We found that the trade-off between accuracy and certified robustness of smoothed classifiers can be greatly controlled by simply regularizing the prediction consistency over noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-07T06:57:43Z) - Regularized Training and Tight Certification for Randomized Smoothed
Classifier with Provable Robustness [15.38718018477333]
We derive a new regularized risk, in which the regularizer can adaptively encourage the accuracy and robustness of the smoothed counterpart.
We also design a new certification algorithm, which can leverage the regularization effect to provide tighter robustness lower bound that holds with high probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-17T20:54:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.