Collage is the New Writing: Exploring the Fragmentation of Text and User Interfaces in AI Tools
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17217v1
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:35:17 GMT
- Title: Collage is the New Writing: Exploring the Fragmentation of Text and User Interfaces in AI Tools
- Authors: Daniel Buschek,
- Abstract summary: The essay employs Collage as an analytical lens to analyse the user interface design of recent AI writing tools.
A critical perspective relates the concerns that writers historically expressed through literary collage to AI writing tools.
- Score: 24.71214613787985
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This essay proposes and explores the concept of Collage for the design of AI writing tools, transferred from avant-garde literature with four facets: 1) fragmenting text in writing interfaces, 2) juxtaposing voices (content vs command), 3) integrating material from multiple sources (e.g. text suggestions), and 4) shifting from manual writing to editorial and compositional decision-making, such as selecting and arranging snippets. The essay then employs Collage as an analytical lens to analyse the user interface design of recent AI writing tools, and as a constructive lens to inspire new design directions. Finally, a critical perspective relates the concerns that writers historically expressed through literary collage to AI writing tools. In a broad view, this essay explores how literary concepts can help advance design theory around AI writing tools. It encourages creators of future writing tools to engage not only with new technological possibilities, but also with past writing innovations.
Related papers
- Agents' Room: Narrative Generation through Multi-step Collaboration [54.98886593802834]
We propose a generation framework inspired by narrative theory that decomposes narrative writing into subtasks tackled by specialized agents.
We show that Agents' Room generates stories preferred by expert evaluators over those produced by baseline systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T15:44:42Z) - Towards Full Authorship with AI: Supporting Revision with AI-Generated
Views [3.109675063162349]
Large language models (LLMs) are shaping a new user interface (UI) paradigm in writing tools by enabling users to generate text through prompts.
This paradigm shifts some creative control from the user to the system, thereby diminishing the user's authorship and autonomy in the writing process.
We introduce Textfocals, a prototype designed to investigate a human-centered approach that emphasizes the user's role in writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T01:11:35Z) - Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension from a Topic-aware Perspective [70.37126956655985]
This paper proposes to model multi-turn dialogues from a topic-aware perspective.
We use a dialogue segmentation algorithm to split a dialogue passage into topic-concentrated fragments in an unsupervised way.
We also present a novel model, Topic-Aware Dual-Attention Matching (TADAM) Network, which takes topic segments as processing elements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T11:03:55Z) - VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual
Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping [13.023911633052482]
VISAR is an AI-enabled writing assistant system designed to help writers brainstorm and revise hierarchical goals within their writing context.
It organizes argument structures through synchronized text editing and visual programming, and enhances persuasiveness with argumentation spark recommendations.
A controlled lab study confirmed the usability and effectiveness of VISAR in facilitating the argumentative writing planning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T15:29:03Z) - Beyond Summarization: Designing AI Support for Real-World Expository
Writing Tasks [28.702425557409516]
Large language models have introduced exciting new opportunities and challenges in designing and developing new AI-assisted writing support tools.
Recent work has shown that leveraging this new technology can transform writing in many scenarios such as ideation during creative writing, editing support, and summarization.
We argue that developing AI supports for expository writing has unique and exciting research challenges and can lead to high real-world impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T17:47:11Z) - An Inclusive Notion of Text [69.36678873492373]
We argue that clarity on the notion of text is crucial for reproducible and generalizable NLP.
We introduce a two-tier taxonomy of linguistic and non-linguistic elements that are available in textual sources and can be used in NLP modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-10T14:26:43Z) - Beyond Text Generation: Supporting Writers with Continuous Automatic
Text Summaries [27.853155569154705]
We propose a text editor to help users plan, structure and reflect on their writing process.
It provides continuously updated paragraph-wise summaries as margin annotations, using automatic text summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T13:09:56Z) - Suggestion Lists vs. Continuous Generation: Interaction Design for
Writing with Generative Models on Mobile Devices Affect Text Length, Wording
and Perceived Authorship [27.853155569154705]
We present two user interfaces for writing with AI on mobile devices, which manipulate levels of initiative and control.
With AI suggestions, people wrote less actively, yet felt they were the author.
In both designs, AI increased text length and was perceived to influence wording.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-01T13:57:11Z) - Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration
in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science.
Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts.
editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z) - CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for
Exploring Language Model Capabilities [92.79451009324268]
We present CoAuthor, a dataset designed for revealing GPT-3's capabilities in assisting creative and argumentative writing.
We demonstrate that CoAuthor can address questions about GPT-3's language, ideation, and collaboration capabilities.
We discuss how this work may facilitate a more principled discussion around LMs' promises and pitfalls in relation to interaction design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-18T07:51:57Z) - A Deep Neural Framework for Contextual Affect Detection [51.378225388679425]
A short and simple text carrying no emotion can represent some strong emotions when reading along with its context.
We propose a Contextual Affect Detection framework which learns the inter-dependence of words in a sentence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-28T05:03:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.