Beyond Summarization: Designing AI Support for Real-World Expository Writing Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02623v1
• Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:47:11 GMT
• Title: Beyond Summarization: Designing AI Support for Real-World Expository Writing Tasks
• Authors: Zejiang Shen, Tal August, Pao Siangliulue, Kyle Lo, Jonathan Bragg, Jeff Hammerbacher, Doug Downey, Joseph Chee Chang, David Sontag
• Abstract summary: Large language models have introduced exciting new opportunities and challenges in designing and developing new AI-assisted writing support tools. Recent work has shown that leveraging this new technology can transform writing in many scenarios such as ideation during creative writing, editing support, and summarization. We argue that developing AI supports for expository writing has unique and exciting research challenges and can lead to high real-world impacts.
• Score: 28.702425557409516
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have introduced exciting new opportunities and challenges in designing and developing new AI-assisted writing support tools. Recent work has shown that leveraging this new technology can transform writing in many scenarios such as ideation during creative writing, editing support, and summarization. However, AI-supported expository writing--including real-world tasks like scholars writing literature reviews or doctors writing progress notes--is relatively understudied. In this position paper, we argue that developing AI supports for expository writing has unique and exciting research challenges and can lead to high real-world impacts. We characterize expository writing as evidence-based and knowledge-generating: it contains summaries of external documents as well as new information or knowledge. It can be seen as the product of authors' sensemaking process over a set of source documents, and the interplay between reading, reflection, and writing opens up new opportunities for designing AI support. We sketch three components for AI support design and discuss considerations for future research.

Related papers

• "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
  We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools. Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation. Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z)
• Diffusion-Based Visual Art Creation: A Survey and New Perspectives [51.522935314070416]
  This survey explores the emerging realm of diffusion-based visual art creation, examining its development from both artistic and technical perspectives. Our findings reveal how artistic requirements are transformed into technical challenges and highlight the design and application of diffusion-based methods within visual art creation. We aim to shed light on the mechanisms through which AI systems emulate and possibly, enhance human capacities in artistic perception and creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T04:49:50Z)
• Generative AI in Evidence-Based Software Engineering: A White Paper [10.489725182789885]
  In less than a year practitioners and researchers witnessed a rapid and wide implementation of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Textual GAIs capabilities enable researchers worldwide to explore new generative scenarios simplifying and hastening all timeconsuming text generation and analysis tasks. Based on our current investigation we will follow up the vision with the creation and empirical validation of a comprehensive suite of models to effectively support EBSE researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T17:16:17Z)
• Collage is the New Writing: Exploring the Fragmentation of Text and User Interfaces in AI Tools [24.71214613787985]
  The essay employs Collage as an analytical lens to analyse the user interface design of recent AI writing tools. A critical perspective relates the concerns that writers historically expressed through literary collage to AI writing tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T14:35:17Z)
• AI-Assisted Writing in Education: Ecosystem Risks and Mitigations [3.1723777607318295]
  We draw insights from extensive research integrated with practice on a writing feedback tool over 9 years at a university. It informs the design of educational writing support tools to be better aligned within broader contexts to balance innovation with practical impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T04:49:35Z)
• A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants [55.9780345526642]
  We explore five aspects of writing assistants: task, user, technology, interaction, and ecosystem. Within each aspect, we define dimensions (i.e., fundamental components of an aspect) and codes (i.e., potential options for each dimension) by systematically reviewing 115 papers. Our design space aims to offer researchers and designers a practical tool to navigate, comprehend, and compare the various possibilities of writing assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T04:03:16Z)
• Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI [0.0]
  This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing. We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T04:35:00Z)
• PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing [48.33722012818687]
  ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers. This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia. We propose a framework we name "PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use of AI in their writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T14:28:04Z)
• The Future of AI-Assisted Writing [0.0]
  We conduct a comparative user-study between such tools from an information retrieval lens: pull and push. Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in their writing. Users also enjoyed the collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of ownership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T02:46:45Z)
• The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces [54.2590226904332]
  We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers. Ten prototype interfaces have been developed and more than 300 participants and real-world users have shown improved reading experiences. We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T02:47:09Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.