Does Geo-co-location Matter? A Case Study of Public Health Conversations during COVID-19
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17710v2
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 06:24:37 GMT
- Title: Does Geo-co-location Matter? A Case Study of Public Health Conversations during COVID-19
- Authors: Paiheng Xu, Louiqa Raschid, Vanessa Frias-Martinez,
- Abstract summary: Key goal for public health experts was to encourage prosocial behavior that could impact local outcomes such as masking and social distancing.
This study examines the impact of geographic co-location, as a proxy for localized engagement between public health experts (PHEs) and the public, on social media.
Our findings reveal that geo-co-location is associated with higher engagement rates, especially in conversations on topics including masking, lockdowns, and education.
- Score: 0.9831489366502298
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Social media platforms like Twitter (now X) have been pivotal in information dissemination and public engagement, especially during COVID-19. A key goal for public health experts was to encourage prosocial behavior that could impact local outcomes such as masking and social distancing. Given the importance of local news and guidance during COVID-19, the objective of our research is to analyze the effect of localized engagement, on social media conversations. This study examines the impact of geographic co-location, as a proxy for localized engagement between public health experts (PHEs) and the public, on social media. We analyze a Twitter conversation dataset from January 2020 to November 2021, comprising over 19 K tweets from nearly five hundred PHEs, along with approximately 800 K replies from 350 K participants. Our findings reveal that geo-co-location is associated with higher engagement rates, especially in conversations on topics including masking, lockdowns, and education, and in conversations with academic and medical professionals. Lexical features associated with emotion and personal experiences were more common in geo-co-located contexts. This research provides insights into how geographic co-location influences social media engagement and can inform strategies to improve public health messaging.
Related papers
- Cutting through the noise to motivate people: A comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 social media posts de/motivating vaccination [1.1606619391009658]
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant weaknesses in the healthcare information system.
The overwhelming volume of misinformation on social media created challenges to motivate people to take proper precautions and get vaccinated.
This study addresses scientific communication and public motivation in social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-15T02:36:11Z) - Executive Voiced Laughter and Social Approval: An Explorative Machine
Learning Study [56.03830131919201]
We study voiced laughter in executive communication and its effect on social approval.
Our findings contribute to research at the nexus of executive communication, strategic leadership, and social evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T14:39:00Z) - Exploring celebrity influence on public attitude towards the COVID-19
pandemic: social media shared sentiment analysis [0.7340017786387767]
People have turned to social media networks to share sentiments related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We examined the role of social messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye in determining overall public discourse direction.
Our findings suggest the presence of consistent patterns of emotional content co-occurring with messaging shared by Persons in the Public Eye.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T21:56:50Z) - "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the
Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models.
We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z) - Know it to Defeat it: Exploring Health Rumor Characteristics and
Debunking Efforts on Chinese Social Media during COVID-19 Crisis [65.74516068984232]
We conduct a comprehensive analysis of four months of rumor-related online discussion during COVID-19 on Weibo, a Chinese microblogging site.
Results suggest that the dread (cause fear) type of health rumors provoked significantly more discussions and lasted longer than the wish (raise hope) type.
We show the efficacy of debunking in suppressing rumor discussions, which is time-sensitive and varies across rumor types and debunkers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-25T14:02:29Z) - American Twitter Users Revealed Social Determinants-related Oral Health
Disparities amid the COVID-19 Pandemic [72.44305630014534]
We collected oral health-related tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic from 9,104 Twitter users across 26 states.
Women and younger adults (19-29) are more likely to talk about oral health problems.
People from counties at a higher risk of COVID-19 talk more about tooth decay/gum bleeding and chipped tooth/tooth break.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-16T01:10:06Z) - COVID-19 and Big Data: Multi-faceted Analysis for Spatio-temporal
Understanding of the Pandemic with Social Media Conversations [4.07452542897703]
Social media platforms have served as a vehicle for the global conversation about COVID-19.
We present a framework for analysis, mining, and tracking the critical content and characteristics of social media conversations around the pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-22T00:45:50Z) - Exploratory Analysis of COVID-19 Related Tweets in North America to
Inform Public Health Institutes [16.35823282122559]
We aim to investigate people's reactions and concerns about COVID-19 in North America.
We analyze COVID-19 related tweets using topic modeling and aspect-based sentiment analysis.
We discuss how the results can be helpful for public health agencies when designing a policy for new interventions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-05T21:38:28Z) - Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and
Emotions [44.92240076313168]
We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020.
By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures.
Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z) - Psychometric Analysis and Coupling of Emotions Between State Bulletins
and Twitter in India during COVID-19 Infodemic [7.428097999824421]
COVID-19 infodemic has been spreading faster than the pandemic itself.
Since social media is the largest source of information, managing the infodemic requires mitigating of misinformation.
Twitter alone has seen a sharp 45% increase in the usage of its curated events page.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-12T01:51:07Z) - The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the
General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges.
In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President.
This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.