fMRI predictors based on language models of increasing complexity recover brain left lateralization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17992v2
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:01:50 GMT
- Title: fMRI predictors based on language models of increasing complexity recover brain left lateralization
- Authors: Laurent Bonnasse-Gahot, Christophe Pallier,
- Abstract summary: We show that the left-right difference in brain correlation follows a scaling law with the number of parameters.
This finding reconciles computational analyses of brain activity using large language models with the classic observation from aphasic patients showing left hemisphere dominance for language.
- Score: 4.1618731507412505
- License:
- Abstract: Over the past decade, studies of naturalistic language processing where participants are scanned while listening to continuous text have flourished. Using word embeddings at first, then large language models, researchers have created encoding models to analyze the brain signals. Presenting these models with the same text as the participants allows to identify brain areas where there is a significant correlation between the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series and the ones predicted by the models' artificial neurons. One intriguing finding from these studies is that they have revealed highly symmetric bilateral activation patterns, somewhat at odds with the well-known left lateralization of language processing. Here, we report analyses of an fMRI dataset where we manipulate the complexity of large language models, testing 28 pretrained models from 8 different families, ranging from 124M to 14.2B parameters. First, we observe that the performance of models in predicting brain responses follows a scaling law, where the fit with brain activity increases linearly with the logarithm of the number of parameters of the model (and its performance on natural language processing tasks). Second, although this effect is present in both hemispheres, it is stronger in the left than in the right hemisphere. Specifically, the left-right difference in brain correlation follows a scaling law with the number of parameters. This finding reconciles computational analyses of brain activity using large language models with the classic observation from aphasic patients showing left hemisphere dominance for language.
Related papers
- A generative framework to bridge data-driven models and scientific theories in language neuroscience [84.76462599023802]
We present generative explanation-mediated validation, a framework for generating concise explanations of language selectivity in the brain.
We show that explanatory accuracy is closely related to the predictive power and stability of the underlying statistical models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T15:57:48Z) - Large Language Model-based FMRI Encoding of Language Functions for Subjects with Neurocognitive Disorder [53.575426835313536]
This paper explores language-related functional changes in older NCD adults using LLM-based fMRI encoding and brain scores.
We analyze the correlation between brain scores and cognitive scores at both whole-brain and language-related ROI levels.
Our findings reveal that higher cognitive abilities correspond to better brain scores, with correlations peaking in the middle temporal gyrus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T01:09:08Z) - Brain-Like Language Processing via a Shallow Untrained Multihead Attention Network [16.317199232071232]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be effective models of the human language system.
In this work, we investigate the key architectural components driving the surprising alignment of untrained models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T12:54:03Z) - Navigating Brain Language Representations: A Comparative Analysis of Neural Language Models and Psychologically Plausible Models [29.50162863143141]
We compare encoding performance of various neural language models and psychologically plausible models.
Surprisingly, our findings revealed that psychologically plausible models outperformed neural language models across diverse contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T08:48:07Z) - Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRI [47.498241053872924]
We tested whether larger open-source models are better at predicting brain responses recorded using fMRI.
Similar logarithmic behavior was observed when scaling the size of the fMRI training set.
These results suggest that increasing scale in both models and data will yield incredibly effective models of language processing in the brain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T17:53:03Z) - Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain
Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Context [87.31930367845125]
We trained a lexical language model, Glove, and a supra-lexical language model, GPT-2, on a text corpus.
We then assessed to what extent these information-restricted models were able to predict the time-courses of fMRI signal of humans listening to naturalistic text.
Our analyses show that, while most brain regions involved in language are sensitive to both syntactic and semantic variables, the relative magnitudes of these effects vary a lot across these regions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T08:16:18Z) - Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but
Training Helps [75.84770193489639]
We examine the impact of test loss, training corpus and model architecture on the prediction of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging timecourses of participants listening to an audiobook.
We find that untrained versions of each model already explain significant amount of signal in the brain by capturing similarity in brain responses across identical words.
We suggest good practices for future studies aiming at explaining the human language system using neural language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-07T15:37:17Z) - Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language
in 305 subjects [82.81964713263483]
A popular approach to decompose the neural bases of language consists in correlating, across individuals, the brain responses to different stimuli.
Here, we show that a model-based approach can reach equivalent results within subjects exposed to natural stimuli.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-12T15:30:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.