Back to the Drawing Board for Fair Representation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18161v1
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 13:23:04 GMT
• Title: Back to the Drawing Board for Fair Representation Learning
• Authors: Angéline Pouget, Nikola Jovanović, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin Vechev,
• Abstract summary: The evaluation of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) methods primarily focuses on the tradeoff between downstream fairness and accuracy with respect to a single task. In this work, we argue that this approach is fundamentally mismatched with the original motivation of FRL. We propose TransFair, a benchmark that satisfies four criteria that a suitable evaluation procedure should fulfill.
• Score: 2.7379431425414684
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The goal of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) is to mitigate biases in machine learning models by learning data representations that enable high accuracy on downstream tasks while minimizing discrimination based on sensitive attributes. The evaluation of FRL methods in many recent works primarily focuses on the tradeoff between downstream fairness and accuracy with respect to a single task that was used to approximate the utility of representations during training (proxy task). This incentivizes retaining only features relevant to the proxy task while discarding all other information. In extreme cases, this can cause the learned representations to collapse to a trivial, binary value, rendering them unusable in transfer settings. In this work, we argue that this approach is fundamentally mismatched with the original motivation of FRL, which arises from settings with many downstream tasks unknown at training time (transfer tasks). To remedy this, we propose to refocus the evaluation protocol of FRL methods primarily around the performance on transfer tasks. A key challenge when conducting such an evaluation is the lack of adequate benchmarks. We address this by formulating four criteria that a suitable evaluation procedure should fulfill. Based on these, we propose TransFair, a benchmark that satisfies these criteria, consisting of novel variations of popular FRL datasets with carefully calibrated transfer tasks. In this setting, we reevaluate state-of-the-art FRL methods, observing that they often overfit to the proxy task, which causes them to underperform on certain transfer tasks. We further highlight the importance of task-agnostic learning signals for FRL methods, as they can lead to more transferrable representations.

Related papers

• Balancing the Scales: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Classification [2.262217900462841]
  Fairness in classification tasks has traditionally focused on bias removal from neural representations. Recent trends favor algorithmic methods that embed fairness into the training process. We employ the contextual multi-armed bandit framework and adapt three popular RL algorithms to suit our objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T11:28:16Z)
• Revisiting the Robustness of the Minimum Error Entropy Criterion: A Transfer Learning Case Study [16.07380451502911]
  This paper revisits the robustness of the minimum error entropy criterion to deal with non-Gaussian noises. We investigate its feasibility and usefulness in real-life transfer learning regression tasks, where distributional shifts are common.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T15:38:11Z)
• An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learning [16.05523977032659]
  Task transfer learning is a popular technique in image processing applications that uses pre-trained models to reduce the supervision cost of related tasks. We present a novel metric, H-score, that estimates the performance of transferred representations from one task to another in classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T08:47:17Z)
• FARE: Provably Fair Representation Learning with Practical Certificates [9.242965489146398]
  We introduce FARE, the first FRL method with practical fairness certificates. FARE is based on our key insight that restricting the representation space of the encoder enables the derivation of practical guarantees. We show that FARE produces practical certificates that are tight and often even comparable with purely empirical results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:40:07Z)
• Light-weight probing of unsupervised representations for Reinforcement Learning [20.638410483549706]
  We study whether linear probing can be a proxy evaluation task for the quality of unsupervised RL representation. We show that the probing tasks are strongly rank correlated with the downstream RL performance on the Atari100k Benchmark. This provides a more efficient method for exploring the space of pretraining algorithms and identifying promising pretraining recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T21:08:01Z)
• Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning [147.28638631734486]
  In reinforcement learning (RL), it is easier to solve a task if given a good representation. While deep RL should automatically acquire such good representations, prior work often finds that learning representations in an end-to-end fashion is unstable. We show (contrastive) representation learning methods can be cast as RL algorithms in their own right.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T14:34:15Z)
• Provable Benefits of Representational Transfer in Reinforcement Learning [59.712501044999875]
  We study the problem of representational transfer in RL, where an agent first pretrains in a number of source tasks to discover a shared representation. We show that given generative access to source tasks, we can discover a representation, using which subsequent linear RL techniques quickly converge to a near-optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T04:31:29Z)
• Exploratory State Representation Learning [63.942632088208505]
  We propose a new approach called XSRL (eXploratory State Representation Learning) to solve the problems of exploration and SRL in parallel. On one hand, it jointly learns compact state representations and a state transition estimator which is used to remove unexploitable information from the representations. On the other hand, it continuously trains an inverse model, and adds to the prediction error of this model a $k$-step learning progress bonus to form the objective of a discovery policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T10:11:07Z)
• Instabilities of Offline RL with Pre-Trained Neural Representation [127.89397629569808]
  In offline reinforcement learning (RL), we seek to utilize offline data to evaluate (or learn) policies in scenarios where the data are collected from a distribution that substantially differs from that of the target policy to be evaluated. Recent theoretical advances have shown that such sample-efficient offline RL is indeed possible provided certain strong representational conditions hold. This work studies these issues from an empirical perspective to gauge how stable offline RL methods are.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T18:06:44Z)
• Towards Accurate Knowledge Transfer via Target-awareness Representation Disentanglement [56.40587594647692]
  We propose a novel transfer learning algorithm, introducing the idea of Target-awareness REpresentation Disentanglement (TRED) TRED disentangles the relevant knowledge with respect to the target task from the original source model and used as a regularizer during fine-tuning the target model. Experiments on various real world datasets show that our method stably improves the standard fine-tuning by more than 2% in average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T17:45:08Z)
• Pre-training Is (Almost) All You Need: An Application to Commonsense Reasoning [61.32992639292889]
  Fine-tuning of pre-trained transformer models has become the standard approach for solving common NLP tasks. We introduce a new scoring method that casts a plausibility ranking task in a full-text format. We show that our method provides a much more stable training phase across random restarts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T10:54:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.