Evaluating Bayesian deep learning for radio galaxy classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18351v1
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 16:49:28 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Bayesian deep learning for radio galaxy classification
• Abstract summary: Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) provide a principled way to model uncertainty in the predictions made by deep learning models. We evaluate the performance of different BNNs against the following criteria: predictive performance, uncertainty calibration and distribution-shift detection for the radio galaxy classification problem.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The radio astronomy community is rapidly adopting deep learning techniques to deal with the huge data volumes expected from the next generation of radio observatories. Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) provide a principled way to model uncertainty in the predictions made by such deep learning models and will play an important role in extracting well-calibrated uncertainty estimates on their outputs. In this work, we evaluate the performance of different BNNs against the following criteria: predictive performance, uncertainty calibration and distribution-shift detection for the radio galaxy classification problem.

Related papers

• Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks [72.97620734290139]
  A popular approach for estimating the predictive uncertainty of neural networks is to define a prior distribution over the network parameters. We propose a scalable function-space variational inference method that allows incorporating prior information. We show that the proposed method leads to state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation and predictive performance on a range of prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T18:33:26Z)
• A Benchmark on Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning Prognostics [0.0]
  We assess some of the latest developments in the field of uncertainty quantification for prognostics deep learning. This includes the state-of-the-art variational inference algorithms for Bayesian neural networks (BNN) as well as popular alternatives such as Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), deep ensembles (DE) and heteroscedastic neural networks (HNN) The performance of the methods is evaluated on a subset of the large NASA NCMAPSS dataset for aircraft engines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T16:12:47Z)
• NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural Networks [151.03112356092575]
  We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution. We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z)
• A Variational Bayesian Approach to Learning Latent Variables for Acoustic Knowledge Transfer [55.20627066525205]
  We propose a variational Bayesian (VB) approach to learning distributions of latent variables in deep neural network (DNN) models. Our proposed VB approach can obtain good improvements on target devices, and consistently outperforms 13 state-of-the-art knowledge transfer algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T15:54:01Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Ramifications of Approximate Posterior Inference for Bayesian Deep Learning in Adversarial and Out-of-Distribution Settings [7.476901945542385]
  We show that Bayesian deep learning models on certain occasions marginally outperform conventional neural networks. Preliminary investigations indicate the potential inherent role of bias due to choices of initialisation, architecture or activation functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T16:58:15Z)
• Probabilistic Neighbourhood Component Analysis: Sample Efficient Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning [25.8227937350516]
  We show that uncertainty estimation capability of state-of-the-art BNNs and Deep Ensemble models degrades significantly when the amount of training data is small. We propose a probabilistic generalization of the popular sample-efficient non-parametric kNN approach. Our approach enables deep kNN to accurately quantify underlying uncertainties in its prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T21:36:31Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Frequentist Uncertainty in Recurrent Neural Networks via Blockwise Influence Functions [121.10450359856242]
  Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are instrumental in modelling sequential and time-series data. Existing approaches for uncertainty quantification in RNNs are based predominantly on Bayesian methods. We develop a frequentist alternative that: (a) does not interfere with model training or compromise its accuracy, (b) applies to any RNN architecture, and (c) provides theoretical coverage guarantees on the estimated uncertainty intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T22:45:32Z)
• Deep Bayesian Gaussian Processes for Uncertainty Estimation in Electronic Health Records [30.65770563934045]
  We merge features of the deep Bayesian learning framework with deep kernel learning to leverage the strengths of both methods for more comprehensive uncertainty estimation. We show that our method is less susceptible to making overconfident predictions, especially for the minority class in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T10:36:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.