Confronting the Reproducibility Crisis: A Case Study of Challenges in Cybersecurity AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18753v2
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 03:29:18 GMT
• Title: Confronting the Reproducibility Crisis: A Case Study of Challenges in Cybersecurity AI
• Authors: Richard H. Moulton, Gary A. McCully, John D. Hastings,
• Abstract summary: A key area in AI-based cybersecurity focuses on defending deep neural networks against malicious perturbations. We attempt to validate results from prior work on certified robustness using the VeriGauge toolkit. Our findings underscore the urgent need for standardized methodologies, containerization, and comprehensive documentation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the rapidly evolving field of cybersecurity, ensuring the reproducibility of AI-driven research is critical to maintaining the reliability and integrity of security systems. This paper addresses the reproducibility crisis within the domain of adversarial robustness -- a key area in AI-based cybersecurity that focuses on defending deep neural networks against malicious perturbations. Through a detailed case study, we attempt to validate results from prior work on certified robustness using the VeriGauge toolkit, revealing significant challenges due to software and hardware incompatibilities, version conflicts, and obsolescence. Our findings underscore the urgent need for standardized methodologies, containerization, and comprehensive documentation to ensure the reproducibility of AI models deployed in critical cybersecurity applications. By tackling these reproducibility challenges, we aim to contribute to the broader discourse on securing AI systems against advanced persistent threats, enhancing network and IoT security, and protecting critical infrastructure. This work advocates for a concerted effort within the research community to prioritize reproducibility, thereby strengthening the foundation upon which future cybersecurity advancements are built.

Related papers

• Towards Robust Stability Prediction in Smart Grids: GAN-based Approach under Data Constraints and Adversarial Challenges [53.2306792009435]
  We introduce a novel framework to detect instability in smart grids by employing only stable data. It relies on a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) where the generator is trained to create instability data that are used along with stable data to train the discriminator. Our solution, tested on a dataset composed of real-world stable and unstable samples, achieve accuracy up to 97.5% in predicting grid stability and up to 98.9% in detecting adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:48:25Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Digital Twin for Evaluating Detective Countermeasures in Smart Grid Cybersecurity [0.0]
  This study delves into the potential of digital twins, replicating a smart grid's cyber-physical laboratory environment. We introduce a flexible, comprehensive digital twin model equipped for hardware-in-the-loop evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T08:41:08Z)
• Securing Legacy Communication Networks via Authenticated Cyclic Redundancy Integrity Check [98.34702864029796]
  We propose Authenticated Cyclic Redundancy Integrity Check (ACRIC) ACRIC preserves backward compatibility without requiring additional hardware and is protocol agnostic. We show that ACRIC offers robust security with minimal transmission overhead ( 1 ms)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T18:26:05Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Critical Infrastructure Security: Penetration Testing and Exploit Development Perspectives [0.0]
  This paper reviews literature on critical infrastructure security, focusing on penetration testing and exploit development. Findings of this paper reveal inherent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure and sophisticated threats posed by cyber adversaries. The review underscores the necessity of continuous and proactive security assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T13:17:07Z)
• Generative AI in Cybersecurity [0.0]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has been pivotal in reshaping the field of data analysis, pattern recognition, and decision-making processes. As GAI rapidly progresses, it outstrips the current pace of cybersecurity protocols and regulatory frameworks. The study highlights the critical need for organizations to proactively identify and develop more complex defensive strategies to counter the sophisticated employment of GAI in malware creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T19:03:11Z)
• Generative AI for Secure Physical Layer Communications: A Survey [80.0638227807621]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) stands at the forefront of AI innovation, demonstrating rapid advancement and unparalleled proficiency in generating diverse content. In this paper, we offer an extensive survey on the various applications of GAI in enhancing security within the physical layer of communication networks. We delve into the roles of GAI in addressing challenges of physical layer security, focusing on communication confidentiality, authentication, availability, resilience, and integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T06:22:41Z)
• Trust-based Approaches Towards Enhancing IoT Security: A Systematic Literature Review [3.0969632359049473]
  This research paper presents a systematic literature review on the Trust-based cybersecurity security approaches for IoT. We highlighted the common trust-based mitigation techniques in existence for dealing with these threats. Several open issues were highlighted, and future research directions presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T12:21:35Z)
• Cyber Security Requirements for Platforms Enhancing AI Reproducibility [0.0]
  This study focuses on the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and introduces a new framework for evaluating AI platforms. Five popular AI platforms; Floydhub, BEAT, Codalab, Kaggle, and OpenML were assessed. The analysis revealed that none of these platforms fully incorporates the necessary cyber security measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T09:43:46Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.