Critical Infrastructure Security: Penetration Testing and Exploit Development Perspectives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17256v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:17:07 GMT
• Title: Critical Infrastructure Security: Penetration Testing and Exploit Development Perspectives
• Authors: Papa Kobina Orleans-Bosomtwe,
• Abstract summary: This paper reviews literature on critical infrastructure security, focusing on penetration testing and exploit development. Findings of this paper reveal inherent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure and sophisticated threats posed by cyber adversaries. The review underscores the necessity of continuous and proactive security assessments.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Critical infrastructure refers to essential physical and cyber systems vital to the functioning and stability of societies and economies. These systems include key sectors such as healthcare, energy, and water supply, which are crucial for societal and economic stability and are increasingly becoming prime targets for malicious actors, including state-sponsored hackers, seeking to disrupt national security and economic stability. This paper reviews literature on critical infrastructure security, focusing on penetration testing and exploit development. It explores four main questions: the characteristics of critical infrastructure, the role and challenges of penetration testing, methodologies of exploit development, and the contribution of these practices to security and resilience. The findings of this paper reveal inherent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure and sophisticated threats posed by cyber adversaries. Penetration testing is highlighted as a vital tool for identifying and addressing security weaknesses, allowing organizations to fortify their defenses. Additionally, understanding exploit development helps anticipate and mitigate potential threats, leading to more robust security measures. The review underscores the necessity of continuous and proactive security assessments, advocating for integrating penetration testing and exploit development into regular security protocols. By doing so, organizations can preemptively identify and mitigate risks, enhancing the overall resilience of critical infrastructure. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for ongoing research and collaboration between the public and private sectors to develop innovative solutions for the evolving cyber threat landscape. This comprehensive review aims to provide a foundational understanding of critical infrastructure security and guide future research and practices.

Related papers

• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions. We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making. As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Comprehensive Digital Forensics and Risk Mitigation Strategy for Modern Enterprises [0.0]
  This study outlines an approach to cybersecurity, including proactive threat anticipation, forensic investigations, and compliance with regulations like CCPA. Key threats such as social engineering, insider risks, phishing, and ransomware are examined, along with mitigation strategies leveraging AI and machine learning. The findings emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring, policy enforcement, and adaptive security measures to protect sensitive data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T23:18:49Z)
• AISafetyLab: A Comprehensive Framework for AI Safety Evaluation and Improvement [73.0700818105842]
  We introduce AISafetyLab, a unified framework and toolkit that integrates representative attack, defense, and evaluation methodologies for AI safety. AISafetyLab features an intuitive interface that enables developers to seamlessly apply various techniques. We conduct empirical studies on Vicuna, analyzing different attack and defense strategies to provide valuable insights into their comparative effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T02:11:52Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability. The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• New Emerged Security and Privacy of Pre-trained Model: a Survey and Outlook [54.24701201956833]
  Security and privacy issues have undermined users' confidence in pre-trained models. Current literature lacks a clear taxonomy of emerging attacks and defenses for pre-trained models. This taxonomy categorizes attacks and defenses into No-Change, Input-Change, and Model-Change approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T10:15:33Z)
• Confronting the Reproducibility Crisis: A Case Study of Challenges in Cybersecurity AI [0.0]
  A key area in AI-based cybersecurity focuses on defending deep neural networks against malicious perturbations. We attempt to validate results from prior work on certified robustness using the VeriGauge toolkit. Our findings underscore the urgent need for standardized methodologies, containerization, and comprehensive documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T04:37:19Z)
• Sok: Comprehensive Security Overview, Challenges, and Future Directions of Voice-Controlled Systems [10.86045604075024]
  The integration of Voice Control Systems into smart devices accentuates the importance of their security. Current research has uncovered numerous vulnerabilities in VCS, presenting significant risks to user privacy and security. This study introduces a hierarchical model structure for VCS, providing a novel lens for categorizing and analyzing existing literature in a systematic manner. We classify attacks based on their technical principles and thoroughly evaluate various attributes, such as their methods, targets, vectors, and behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T12:18:46Z)
• Critical Infrastructure Protection: Generative AI, Challenges, and Opportunities [3.447031974719732]
  Critical National Infrastructure (CNI) encompasses a nation's essential assets that are fundamental to the operation of society and the economy. Growing cybersecurity threats targeting these infrastructures can potentially interfere with operations and seriously risk national security and public safety. We examine the intricate issues raised by cybersecurity risks to vital infrastructure, highlighting these systems' vulnerability to different types of cyberattacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T08:08:50Z)
• Securing the Open RAN Infrastructure: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Deployments [60.51751612363882]
  We investigate the security implications of and software-based Open Radio Access Network (RAN) systems. We highlight the presence of potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in the infrastructure supporting the Near Real-Time RAN Controller (RIC) cluster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T07:18:45Z)
• A Survey and Comparative Analysis of Security Properties of CAN Authentication Protocols [92.81385447582882]
  The Controller Area Network (CAN) bus leaves in-vehicle communications inherently non-secure. This paper reviews and compares the 15 most prominent authentication protocols for the CAN bus. We evaluate protocols based on essential operational criteria that contribute to ease of implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T14:52:04Z)
• Trust-based Approaches Towards Enhancing IoT Security: A Systematic Literature Review [3.0969632359049473]
  This research paper presents a systematic literature review on the Trust-based cybersecurity security approaches for IoT. We highlighted the common trust-based mitigation techniques in existence for dealing with these threats. Several open issues were highlighted, and future research directions presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T12:21:35Z)
• The Last Decade in Review: Tracing the Evolution of Safety Assurance Cases through a Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis [7.431812376079826]
  Safety assurance is of paramount importance across various domains, including automotive, aerospace, and nuclear energy. The use of safety assurance cases allows for verifying the correctness of the created systems capabilities, preventing system failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T17:34:23Z)
• Leveraging Traceability to Integrate Safety Analysis Artifacts into the Software Development Process [51.42800587382228]
  Safety assurance cases (SACs) can be challenging to maintain during system evolution. We propose a solution that leverages software traceability to connect relevant system artifacts to safety analysis models. We elicit design rationales for system changes to help safety stakeholders analyze the impact of system changes on safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T16:03:27Z)
• Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks, Evaluations, and Improvements [76.80453043969209]
  This survey presents a framework for safety research pertaining to large models. We begin by introducing safety issues of wide concern, then delve into safety evaluation methods for large models. We explore the strategies for enhancing large model safety from training to deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T09:32:55Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.