A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19097v2
• Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 19:17:30 GMT
• Title: A study of why we need to reassess full reference image quality assessment with medical images
• Authors: Anna Breger, Ander Biguri, Malena Sabaté Landman, Ian Selby, Nicole Amberg, Elisabeth Brunner, Janek Gröhl, Sepideh Hatamikia, Clemens Karner, Lipeng Ning, Sören Dittmer, Michael Roberts, AIX-COVNET Collaboration, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb,
• Abstract summary: In particular, the FR-IQA measures PSNR and SSIM are known and tested for working successfully in many natural imaging tasks. This paper provides a structured and comprehensive collection of examples where the two most common full reference (FR) image quality measures prove to be unsuitable for the assessment of novel algorithms.
• Score: 7.018256825895632
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Image quality assessment (IQA) is not just indispensable in clinical practice to ensure high standards, but also in the development stage of novel algorithms that operate on medical images with reference data. This paper provides a structured and comprehensive collection of examples where the two most common full reference (FR) image quality measures prove to be unsuitable for the assessment of novel algorithms using different kinds of medical images, including real-world MRI, CT, OCT, X-Ray, digital pathology and photoacoustic imaging data. In particular, the FR-IQA measures PSNR and SSIM are known and tested for working successfully in many natural imaging tasks, but discrepancies in medical scenarios have been noted in the literature. Inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have very different properties than natural images which have not been targeted nor tested in the development of the mentioned measures, and therefore might imply wrong judgement of novel methods for medical images. Therefore, improvement is urgently needed in particular in this era of AI to increase explainability, reproducibility and generalizability in machine learning for medical imaging and beyond. On top of the pitfalls we will provide ideas for future research as well as suggesting guidelines for the usage of FR-IQA measures applied to medical images.

Related papers

• Clinical Evaluation of Medical Image Synthesis: A Case Study in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy [63.39037092484374]
  This study focuses on the clinical evaluation of medical Synthetic Data Generation using Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. The paper contributes by a) presenting a protocol for the systematic evaluation of synthetic images by medical experts and b) applying it to assess TIDE-II, a novel variational autoencoder-based model for high-resolution WCE image synthesis. The results show that TIDE-II generates clinically relevant WCE images, helping to address data scarcity and enhance diagnostic tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T19:48:50Z)
• Evidence Is All You Need: Ordering Imaging Studies via Language Model Alignment with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria [22.897900474995012]
  We introduce a framework to intelligently leverage language models by recommending imaging studies for patient cases aligned with evidence-based guidelines. We make available a novel dataset of patient "one-liner" scenarios to power our experiments, and optimize state-of-the-art language models to achieve an accuracy on par with clinicians in image ordering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T23:13:17Z)
• A study on the adequacy of common IQA measures for medical images [6.580928439802918]
  Reported inconsistencies arising in medical images are not surprising, as they have different properties than natural images. In this study, we test the applicability of common IQA measures for medical image data by comparing their assessment to manually rated chest X-ray (5 experts) and photoacoustic image data (2 experts)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T16:04:03Z)
• Radiology Report Generation Using Transformers Conditioned with Non-imaging Data [55.17268696112258]
  This paper proposes a novel multi-modal transformer network that integrates chest x-ray (CXR) images and associated patient demographic information. The proposed network uses a convolutional neural network to extract visual features from CXRs and a transformer-based encoder-decoder network that combines the visual features with semantic text embeddings of patient demographic information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:52:26Z)
• Implicit Neural Representation in Medical Imaging: A Comparative Survey [3.478921293603811]
  Implicit neural representations (INRs) have gained prominence as a powerful paradigm in scene reconstruction and computer graphics. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of INR models in the field of medical imaging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T06:39:25Z)
• A Trustworthy Framework for Medical Image Analysis with Deep Learning [71.48204494889505]
  TRUDLMIA is a trustworthy deep learning framework for medical image analysis. It is anticipated that the framework will support researchers and clinicians in advancing the use of deep learning for dealing with public health crises including COVID-19.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T05:30:22Z)
• Towards the Use of Saliency Maps for Explaining Low-Quality Electrocardiograms to End Users [45.62380752173638]
  When using medical images for diagnosis, it is important that the images are of high quality. In telemedicine, a common problem is that the quality issue is only flagged once the patient has left the clinic, meaning they must return in order to have the exam redone. This paper reports on the development of an AI system for flagging and explaining low-quality medical images in real-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-06T14:53:26Z)
• Automated SSIM Regression for Detection and Quantification of Motion Artefacts in Brain MR Images [54.739076152240024]
  Motion artefacts in magnetic resonance brain images are a crucial issue. The assessment of MR image quality is fundamental before proceeding with the clinical diagnosis. An automated image quality assessment based on the structural similarity index (SSIM) regression has been proposed here.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T10:16:54Z)
• Assessing the ability of generative adversarial networks to learn canonical medical image statistics [10.479865560555199]
  generative adversarial networks (GANs) have gained tremendous popularity for potential applications in medical imaging. It is not clear if modern GANs reliably learn the statistics that are meaningful to a downstream medical imaging application. In this work, the ability of a state-of-the-art GAN to learn the statistics of canonical image models (SIMs) that are relevant to objective assessment of image quality is investigated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T00:30:01Z)
• Image Quality Assessment for Magnetic Resonance Imaging [4.05136808278614]
  Image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms aim to reproduce the human's perception of the image quality. We use outputs of neural network models trained to solve problems relevant to MRI. Seven trained radiologists assess distorted images, with their verdicts then correlated with 35 different image quality metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T11:52:29Z)
• Explaining Clinical Decision Support Systems in Medical Imaging using Cycle-Consistent Activation Maximization [112.2628296775395]
  Clinical decision support using deep neural networks has become a topic of steadily growing interest. clinicians are often hesitant to adopt the technology because its underlying decision-making process is considered to be intransparent and difficult to comprehend. We propose a novel decision explanation scheme based on CycleGAN activation which generates high-quality visualizations of classifier decisions even in smaller data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T14:39:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.