Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19162v1
• Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 15:06:10 GMT
• Title: Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning?
• Authors: Sarthak Mittal, Eric Elmoznino, Leo Gagnon, Sangnie Bhardwaj, Dhanya Sridhar, Guillaume Lajoie,
• Abstract summary: Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights. In this paper, we investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents. We find little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards task-relevant latent variables does not lead to better out-of-distribution performance.
• Score: 13.828665019247444
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting avenues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by inferring task latents, it is unclear if Transformers implicitly do so or if they instead exploit heuristics and statistical shortcuts enabled by attention layers. Both scenarios have inspired active ongoing work. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents. We minimally modify the Transformer architecture with a bottleneck designed to prevent shortcuts in favor of more structured solutions, and then compare performance against standard Transformers across various ICL tasks. Contrary to intuition and some recent works, we find little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards task-relevant latent variables does not lead to better out-of-distribution performance, in general. Curiously, we find that while the bottleneck effectively learns to extract latent task variables from context, downstream processing struggles to utilize them for robust prediction. Our study highlights the intrinsic limitations of Transformers in achieving structured ICL solutions that generalize, and shows that while inferring the right latents aids interpretability, it is not sufficient to alleviate this problem.

Related papers

• On the Role of Depth and Looping for In-Context Learning with Task Diversity [69.4145579827826]
  We study in-context learning for linear regression with diverse tasks. We show that multilayer Transformers are not robust to even distributional shifts as small as $O(e-L)$ in Wasserstein distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T03:27:56Z)
• Context-Scaling versus Task-Scaling in In-Context Learning [17.36757113301424]
  We analyze two key components of In-Context Learning (ICL): context-scaling and task-scaling. While transformers are capable of both context-scaling and task-scaling, we empirically show that standard Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) with vectorized input are only capable of task-scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T17:58:08Z)
• Transformers are Minimax Optimal Nonparametric In-Context Learners [36.291980654891496]
  In-context learning of large language models has proven to be a surprisingly effective method of learning a new task from only a few demonstrative examples. We develop approximation and generalization error bounds for a transformer composed of a deep neural network and one linear attention layer. We show that sufficiently trained transformers can achieve -- and even improve upon -- the minimax optimal estimation risk in context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T08:02:10Z)
• Dissecting Multiplication in Transformers: Insights into LLMs [23.109124772063574]
  We focus on a typical arithmetic task, integer multiplication, to explore and explain the imperfection of transformers in this domain. We provide comprehensive analysis of a vanilla transformer trained to perform n-digit integer multiplication. We propose improvements to enhance transformers performance on multiplication tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T04:07:26Z)
• On Mesa-Optimization in Autoregressively Trained Transformers: Emergence and Capability [34.43255978863601]
  Several suggest that transformers learn a mesa-optimizer during autorere training. We show that a stronger assumption related to the moments of data is the sufficient necessary condition that the learned mesa-optimizer can perform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T05:41:06Z)
• Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Meta-Learning [99.56612787882334]
  Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to efficiently learn new tasks by leveraging multiple pre-trained models without requiring their original training data. For the first time, we reveal two major challenges hindering their practical deployments: Task-Distribution Shift ( TDS) and Task-Distribution Corruption (TDC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T15:46:54Z)
• Pretraining task diversity and the emergence of non-Bayesian in-context learning for regression [31.950737940558984]
  Pretrained transformers exhibit the remarkable ability of in-context learning (ICL) Can ICL solve fundamentally $textitnew$ tasks that are very different from those seen during pretraining?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T21:05:20Z)
• Supervised Pretraining Can Learn In-Context Reinforcement Learning [96.62869749926415]
  In this paper, we study the in-context learning capabilities of transformers in decision-making problems. We introduce and study Decision-Pretrained Transformer (DPT), a supervised pretraining method where the transformer predicts an optimal action. We find that the pretrained transformer can be used to solve a range of RL problems in-context, exhibiting both exploration online and conservatism offline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T17:58:50Z)
• Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm Selection [88.23337313766353]
  This work first provides a comprehensive statistical theory for transformers to perform ICL. We show that transformers can implement a broad class of standard machine learning algorithms in context. A emphsingle transformer can adaptively select different base ICL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T17:59:31Z)
• Optimizing Non-Autoregressive Transformers with Contrastive Learning [74.46714706658517]
  Non-autoregressive Transformers (NATs) reduce the inference latency of Autoregressive Transformers (ATs) by predicting words all at once rather than in sequential order. In this paper, we propose to ease the difficulty of modality learning via sampling from the model distribution instead of the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:20:13Z)
• Multi-task Supervised Learning via Cross-learning [102.64082402388192]
  We consider a problem known as multi-task learning, consisting of fitting a set of regression functions intended for solving different tasks. In our novel formulation, we couple the parameters of these functions, so that they learn in their task specific domains while staying close to each other. This facilitates cross-fertilization in which data collected across different domains help improving the learning performance at each other task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T21:35:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.