Predictive Uncertainty Quantification for Bird's Eye View Segmentation: A Benchmark and Novel Loss Function
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20986v2
- Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 07:46:05 GMT
- Title: Predictive Uncertainty Quantification for Bird's Eye View Segmentation: A Benchmark and Novel Loss Function
- Authors: Linlin Yu, Bowen Yang, Tianhao Wang, Kangshuo Li, Feng Chen,
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces a benchmark for predictive uncertainty quantification in Bird's Eye View (BEV) segmentation.<n>Our study focuses on the effectiveness of quantified uncertainty in detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution pixels.<n>We propose a novel loss function, Uncertainty-Focal-Cross-Entropy (UFCE), specifically designed for highly imbalanced data.
- Score: 10.193504550494486
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The fusion of raw sensor data to create a Bird's Eye View (BEV) representation is critical for autonomous vehicle planning and control. Despite the growing interest in using deep learning models for BEV semantic segmentation, anticipating segmentation errors and enhancing the explainability of these models remain underexplored. This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark for predictive uncertainty quantification in BEV segmentation, evaluating multiple uncertainty quantification methods across three popular datasets with three representative network architectures. Our study focuses on the effectiveness of quantified uncertainty in detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution (OOD) pixels while also improving model calibration. Through empirical analysis, we uncover challenges in existing uncertainty quantification methods and demonstrate the potential of evidential deep learning techniques, which capture both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. To address these challenges, we propose a novel loss function, Uncertainty-Focal-Cross-Entropy (UFCE), specifically designed for highly imbalanced data, along with a simple uncertainty-scaling regularization term that improves both uncertainty quantification and model calibration for BEV segmentation.
Related papers
- Uncertainty separation via ensemble quantile regression [23.667247644930708]
This paper introduces a novel and scalable framework for uncertainty estimation and separation.
Our framework is scalable to large datasets and demonstrates superior performance on synthetic benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T11:15:32Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Artificial Intelligence for Gear Fault Diagnosis in Motor Drives [0.5325390073522079]
This paper introduces a novel approach to quantify the uncertainties in fault diagnosis of motor drives using Bayesian neural networks (BNN)
BNNs treat network weights as probability distributions rather than fixed values.
It offers several advantages: improved robustness to noisy data, (b) enhanced interpretability of model predictions, and (c) the ability to quantify uncertainty in the decision-making processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T08:38:20Z) - Benchmarking and Improving Bird's Eye View Perception Robustness in Autonomous Driving [55.93813178692077]
We present RoboBEV, an extensive benchmark suite designed to evaluate the resilience of BEV algorithms.
We assess 33 state-of-the-art BEV-based perception models spanning tasks like detection, map segmentation, depth estimation, and occupancy prediction.
Our experimental results also underline the efficacy of strategies like pre-training and depth-free BEV transformations in enhancing robustness against out-of-distribution data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T17:59:39Z) - Probabilistic Contrastive Learning with Explicit Concentration on the Hypersphere [3.572499139455308]
This paper introduces a new perspective on incorporating uncertainty into contrastive learning by embedding representations within a spherical space.
We leverage the concentration parameter, kappa, as a direct, interpretable measure to quantify uncertainty explicitly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T07:08:13Z) - eXplainable Bayesian Multi-Perspective Generative Retrieval [6.823521786512908]
We introduce uncertainty calibration and interpretability into a retrieval pipeline.
We incorporate techniques such as LIME and SHAP to analyze the behavior of a black-box reranker model.
Our methods demonstrate substantial performance improvements across three KILT datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T09:34:13Z) - Towards Better Certified Segmentation via Diffusion Models [62.21617614504225]
segmentation models can be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, which hinders their use in critical-decision systems like healthcare or autonomous driving.
Recently, randomized smoothing has been proposed to certify segmentation predictions by adding Gaussian noise to the input to obtain theoretical guarantees.
In this paper, we address the problem of certifying segmentation prediction using a combination of randomized smoothing and diffusion models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T16:30:39Z) - Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning [37.82259435084825]
This paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs)
It applies both data-dependent or data-independent regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning.
Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T14:19:15Z) - Toward Reliable Human Pose Forecasting with Uncertainty [51.628234388046195]
We develop an open-source library for human pose forecasting, including multiple models, supporting several datasets.
We devise two types of uncertainty in the problem to increase performance and convey better trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-13T17:56:08Z) - Lightweight, Uncertainty-Aware Conformalized Visual Odometry [2.429910016019183]
Data-driven visual odometry (VO) is a critical subroutine for autonomous edge robotics.
Emerging edge robotics devices like insect-scale drones and surgical robots lack a computationally efficient framework to estimate VO's predictive uncertainties.
This paper presents a novel, lightweight, and statistically robust framework that leverages conformal inference (CI) to extract VO's uncertainty bands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T20:37:55Z) - Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep
Learning [61.94125052118442]
Uncertainty estimation is a key factor that makes deep learning reliable in practical applications.
We propose a novel method, Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learning ($mathcalI$-EDL)
In particular, we introduce Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) to measure the informativeness of evidence carried by each sample, according to which we can dynamically reweight the objective loss terms to make the network more focused on the representation learning of uncertain classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T16:12:59Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by utilizing Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [52.03490691733464]
We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.
By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for the problem of medical image segmentation.
DeviS incorporates an uncertainty-aware filtering module, which utilizes the metric of uncertainty-calibrated error to filter reliable data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Uncertainty-aware Panoptic Segmentation [21.89063036529791]
We introduce the novel task of uncertainty-aware panoptic segmentation.
It aims to predict per-pixel semantic and instance segmentations, together with per-pixel uncertainty estimates.
We propose the novel top-down Evidential Panoptic Network (EvPSNet) to solve this task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T12:07:21Z) - Trustworthy Medical Segmentation with Uncertainty Estimation [0.7829352305480285]
This paper introduces a new Bayesian deep learning framework for uncertainty quantification in segmentation neural networks.
We evaluate the proposed framework on medical image segmentation data from Magnetic Resonances Imaging and Computed Tomography scans.
Our experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework is more robust to noise and adversarial attacks as compared to state-of-the-art segmentation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T22:46:05Z) - Gradient-Based Quantification of Epistemic Uncertainty for Deep Object
Detectors [8.029049649310213]
We introduce novel gradient-based uncertainty metrics and investigate them for different object detection architectures.
Experiments show significant improvements in true positive / false positive discrimination and prediction of intersection over union.
We also find improvement over Monte-Carlo dropout uncertainty metrics and further significant boosts by aggregating different sources of uncertainty metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T16:04:11Z) - The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data.
This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z) - Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution
Shifts [49.58991359544005]
PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method.
We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.