Concept Formation and Alignment in Language Models: Bridging Statistical Patterns in Latent Space to Concept Taxonomy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05315v1
• Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:27:19 GMT
• Title: Concept Formation and Alignment in Language Models: Bridging Statistical Patterns in Latent Space to Concept Taxonomy
• Authors: Mehrdad Khatir, Chandan K. Reddy,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the concept formation and alignment within the realm of language models (LMs) We propose a mechanism for identifying concepts and their hierarchical organization within the semantic representations learned by various LMs.
• Score: 11.232704182001253
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper explores the concept formation and alignment within the realm of language models (LMs). We propose a mechanism for identifying concepts and their hierarchical organization within the semantic representations learned by various LMs, encompassing a spectrum from early models like Glove to the transformer-based language models like ALBERT and T5. Our approach leverages the inherent structure present in the semantic embeddings generated by these models to extract a taxonomy of concepts and their hierarchical relationships. This investigation sheds light on how LMs develop conceptual understanding and opens doors to further research to improve their ability to reason and leverage real-world knowledge. We further conducted experiments and observed the possibility of isolating these extracted conceptual representations from the reasoning modules of the transformer-based LMs. The observed concept formation along with the isolation of conceptual representations from the reasoning modules can enable targeted token engineering to open the door for potential applications in knowledge transfer, explainable AI, and the development of more modular and conceptually grounded language models.

Related papers

• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making. With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems. We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective [64.00022624183781]
  Large language models (LLMs) can assess relevance and support information retrieval (IR) tasks. We investigate how different LLM modules contribute to relevance judgment through the lens of mechanistic interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:55Z)
• HiBench: Benchmarking LLMs Capability on Hierarchical Structure Reasoning [25.088407009353162]
  Existing benchmarks for structure reasoning mainly focus on horizontal and coordinate structures. HiBench is the first framework spanning from initial structure generation to final proficiency assessment. It consists of 30 tasks with varying hierarchical complexity, totaling 39,519 queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T14:25:37Z)
• Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision [50.45597801390757]
  Instruct-LF is a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system. It integrates instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:03:08Z)
• Enhancing Table Recognition with Vision LLMs: A Benchmark and Neighbor-Guided Toolchain Reasoner [47.13805762269659]
  We employ Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) in a training-free reasoning paradigm to recognize unstructured tables. We propose the Neighbor-Guided Toolchain Reasoner (NGTR) framework to mitigate issues with low-quality input images. Our approach significantly enhances the recognition capabilities of the vanilla VLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T02:40:19Z)
• Understanding Ranking LLMs: A Mechanistic Analysis for Information Retrieval [20.353393773305672]
  We employ a probing-based analysis to examine neuron activations in ranking LLMs. Our study spans a broad range of feature categories, including lexical signals, document structure, query-document interactions, and complex semantic representations. Our findings offer crucial insights for developing more transparent and reliable retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T08:20:10Z)
• Flexible categorization using formal concept analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory [40.30013238421509]
  We discuss a machine-leaning meta-algorithm for outlier detection and classification. The framework provides a formal ground to generate and study explainable categorizations of sets of entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T07:28:20Z)
• A Concept-Based Explainability Framework for Large Multimodal Models [52.37626977572413]
  We propose a dictionary learning based approach, applied to the representation of tokens. We show that these concepts are well semantically grounded in both vision and text. We show that the extracted multimodal concepts are useful to interpret representations of test samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T10:48:53Z)
• Learning Discrete Concepts in Latent Hierarchical Models [73.01229236386148]
  Learning concepts from natural high-dimensional data holds potential in building human-aligned and interpretable machine learning models. We formalize concepts as discrete latent causal variables that are related via a hierarchical causal model. We substantiate our theoretical claims with synthetic data experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T18:01:03Z)
• Explaining Multi-modal Large Language Models by Analyzing their Vision Perception [4.597864989500202]
  This research proposes a novel approach to enhance the interpretability of MLLMs by focusing on the image embedding component. We combine an open-world localization model with a MLLM, thus creating a new architecture able to simultaneously produce text and object localization outputs from the same vision embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T14:24:23Z)
• ConcEPT: Concept-Enhanced Pre-Training for Language Models [57.778895980999124]
  ConcEPT aims to infuse conceptual knowledge into pre-trained language models. It exploits external entity concept prediction to predict the concepts of entities mentioned in the pre-training contexts. Results of experiments show that ConcEPT gains improved conceptual knowledge with concept-enhanced pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T05:05:01Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Models [110.00434385712786]
  We investigate compositional structures in data embeddings from pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) We first present a framework for understanding compositional structures from a geometric perspective. We then explain what these structures entail probabilistically in the case of VLM embeddings, providing intuitions for why they arise in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T08:11:56Z)
• Guiding the PLMs with Semantic Anchors as Intermediate Supervision: Towards Interpretable Semantic Parsing [57.11806632758607]
  We propose to incorporate the current pretrained language models with a hierarchical decoder network. By taking the first-principle structures as the semantic anchors, we propose two novel intermediate supervision tasks. We conduct intensive experiments on several semantic parsing benchmarks and demonstrate that our approach can consistently outperform the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T07:27:29Z)
• Analyzing Encoded Concepts in Transformer Language Models [21.76062029833023]
  ConceptX analyses how latent concepts are encoded in representations learned within pre-trained language models. It uses clustering to discover the encoded concepts and explains them by aligning with a large set of human-defined concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T13:32:10Z)
• Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERT [21.760620298330235]
  We study what latent concepts exist in the pre-trained BERT model. We also release a novel BERT ConceptNet dataset (BCN) consisting of 174 concept labels and 1M annotated instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-15T09:45:34Z)
• The Conceptual VAE [7.15767183672057]
  We present a new model of concepts, based on the framework of variational autoencoders. The model is inspired by, and closely related to, the Beta-VAE model of concepts. We show how the model can be used as a concept classifier, and how it can be adapted to learn from fewer labels per instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T17:27:28Z)
• Formalising Concepts as Grounded Abstractions [68.24080871981869]
  This report shows how representation learning can be used to induce concepts from raw data. The main technical goal of this report is to show how techniques from representation learning can be married with a lattice-theoretic formulation of conceptual spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T15:22:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.