Retrieval Augmented Fact Verification by Synthesizing Contrastive Arguments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09815v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:13:34 GMT
- Title: Retrieval Augmented Fact Verification by Synthesizing Contrastive Arguments
- Authors: Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng, Lanyu Shang, Yifan Liu, Yang Zhang, Dong Wang,
- Abstract summary: We propose retrieval augmented fact verification through the synthesis of contrasting arguments.
Our method effectively retrieves relevant documents as evidence and evaluates arguments from varying perspectives.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through extensive experiments, where RAFTS can outperform GPT-based methods with a significantly smaller 7B LLM.
- Score: 23.639378586798884
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The rapid propagation of misinformation poses substantial risks to public interest. To combat misinformation, large language models (LLMs) are adapted to automatically verify claim credibility. Nevertheless, existing methods heavily rely on the embedded knowledge within LLMs and / or black-box APIs for evidence collection, leading to subpar performance with smaller LLMs or upon unreliable context. In this paper, we propose retrieval augmented fact verification through the synthesis of contrasting arguments (RAFTS). Upon input claims, RAFTS starts with evidence retrieval, where we design a retrieval pipeline to collect and re-rank relevant documents from verifiable sources. Then, RAFTS forms contrastive arguments (i.e., supporting or refuting) conditioned on the retrieved evidence. In addition, RAFTS leverages an embedding model to identify informative demonstrations, followed by in-context prompting to generate the prediction and explanation. Our method effectively retrieves relevant documents as evidence and evaluates arguments from varying perspectives, incorporating nuanced information for fine-grained decision-making. Combined with informative in-context examples as prior, RAFTS achieves significant improvements to supervised and LLM baselines without complex prompts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through extensive experiments, where RAFTS can outperform GPT-based methods with a significantly smaller 7B LLM.
Related papers
- Contrastive Learning to Improve Retrieval for Real-world Fact Checking [84.57583869042791]
We present Contrastive Fact-Checking Reranker (CFR), an improved retriever for fact-checking complex claims.
We leverage the AVeriTeC dataset, which annotates subquestions for claims with human written answers from evidence documents.
We find a 6% improvement in veracity classification accuracy on the dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T00:09:50Z) - Multimodal Misinformation Detection using Large Vision-Language Models [7.505532091249881]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks.
Few approaches consider evidence retrieval as part of misinformation detection.
We propose a novel re-ranking approach for multimodal evidence retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T13:57:11Z) - Ground Every Sentence: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LLMs with Interleaved Reference-Claim Generation [51.8188846284153]
RAG has been widely adopted to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs)
Attributed Text Generation (ATG) has attracted growing attention, which provides citations to support the model's responses in RAG.
This paper proposes a fine-grained ATG method called ReClaim(Refer & Claim), which alternates the generation of references and answers step by step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T20:47:47Z) - LLMs Know What They Need: Leveraging a Missing Information Guided Framework to Empower Retrieval-Augmented Generation [6.676337039829463]
We propose a Missing Information Guided Retrieve-Extraction-Solving paradigm (MIGRES)
We leverage the identification of missing information to generate a targeted query that steers the subsequent knowledge retrieval.
Extensive experiments conducted on multiple public datasets reveal the superiority of the proposed MIGRES method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T09:56:59Z) - Re-Search for The Truth: Multi-round Retrieval-augmented Large Language Models are Strong Fake News Detectors [38.75533934195315]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are known for their remarkable reasoning and generative capabilities.
We introduce a novel, retrieval-augmented LLMs framework--the first of its kind to automatically and strategically extract key evidence from web sources for claim verification.
Our framework ensures the acquisition of sufficient, relevant evidence, thereby enhancing performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T00:35:39Z) - Evidence-Focused Fact Summarization for Knowledge-Augmented Zero-Shot Question Answering [14.389264346634507]
We propose EFSum, an Evidence-focused Fact Summarization framework for enhanced Quesetion Answering (QA) performance.
Our experiments show that EFSum improves LLM's zero-shot QA performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:43:58Z) - C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations.
Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z) - Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for
Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections.
InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z) - GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion.
The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z) - SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level
Relation Extraction [51.27558374091491]
We propose to explicitly teach the model to capture relevant contexts and entity types by supervising and augmenting intermediate steps (SAIS) for relation extraction.
Based on a broad spectrum of carefully designed tasks, our proposed SAIS method not only extracts relations of better quality due to more effective supervision, but also retrieves the corresponding supporting evidence more accurately.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T17:37:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.