Hypothetical Documents or Knowledge Leakage? Rethinking LLM-based Query Expansion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14175v1
• Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 04:32:38 GMT
• Title: Hypothetical Documents or Knowledge Leakage? Rethinking LLM-based Query Expansion
• Authors: Yejun Yoon, Jaeyoon Jung, Seunghyun Yoon, Kunwoo Park,
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether knowledge leakage in benchmarks contributes to the observed performance gains.<n>Our findings indicate that performance improvements occurred consistently only for claims whose generated documents included sentences entailed by ground truth evidence.
• Score: 6.792233590302494
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Query expansion methods powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated effectiveness in zero-shot retrieval tasks. These methods assume that LLMs can generate hypothetical documents that, when incorporated into a query vector, enhance the retrieval of real evidence. However, we challenge this assumption by investigating whether knowledge leakage in benchmarks contributes to the observed performance gains. Using fact verification as a testbed, we analyzed whether the generated documents contained information entailed by ground truth evidence and assessed their impact on performance. Our findings indicate that performance improvements occurred consistently only for claims whose generated documents included sentences entailed by ground truth evidence. This suggests that knowledge leakage may be present in these benchmarks, inflating the perceived performance of LLM-based query expansion methods, particularly in real-world scenarios that require retrieving niche or novel knowledge.

Related papers

• Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision [50.45597801390757]
  Instruct-LF is a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system. It integrates instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:03:08Z)
• Learning More Effective Representations for Dense Retrieval through Deliberate Thinking Before Search [65.53881294642451]
  Deliberate Thinking based Dense Retriever (DEBATER) DEBATER enhances recent dense retrievers by enabling them to learn more effective document representations through a step-by-step thinking process. Experimental results show that DEBATER significantly outperforms existing methods across several retrieval benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:56:34Z)
• IAO Prompting: Making Knowledge Flow Explicit in LLMs through Structured Reasoning Templates [7.839338724237275]
  We introduce IAO (Input-Action-Output), a structured template-based method that explicitly models how Large Language Models access and apply their knowledge.<n>IAO decomposes problems into sequential steps, each clearly identifying the input knowledge being used, the action being performed, and the resulting output.<n>Our findings provide insights into both knowledge representation within LLMs and methods for more reliable knowledge application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T11:14:20Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Retrieval Augmented Fact Verification by Synthesizing Contrastive Arguments [23.639378586798884]
  We propose retrieval augmented fact verification through the synthesis of contrasting arguments. Our method effectively retrieves relevant documents as evidence and evaluates arguments from varying perspectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through extensive experiments, where RAFTS can outperform GPT-based methods with a significantly smaller 7B LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T08:13:34Z)
• LLMs Know What They Need: Leveraging a Missing Information Guided Framework to Empower Retrieval-Augmented Generation [6.676337039829463]
  We propose a Missing Information Guided Retrieve-Extraction-Solving paradigm (MIGRES) We leverage the identification of missing information to generate a targeted query that steers the subsequent knowledge retrieval. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple public datasets reveal the superiority of the proposed MIGRES method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:56:59Z)
• Embedding-Informed Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [37.02290559379761]
  Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) have been remarkably competent in various NLP tasks.<n>Motivated by this, Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ARAG) studies retrieving only when the knowledge asked by the query is absent in the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:21:22Z)
• Corpus-Steered Query Expansion with Large Language Models [35.64662397095323]
  We introduce Corpus-Steered Query Expansion (CSQE) to promote the incorporation of knowledge embedded within the corpus. CSQE utilizes the relevance assessing capability of LLMs to systematically identify pivotal sentences in the initially-retrieved documents. Extensive experiments reveal that CSQE exhibits strong performance without necessitating any training, especially with queries for which LLMs lack knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T03:58:58Z)
• UFO: a Unified and Flexible Framework for Evaluating Factuality of Large Language Models [73.73303148524398]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate text that lacks consistency with human knowledge, leading to factual inaccuracies or textithallucination. We propose textttUFO, an LLM-based unified and flexible evaluation framework to verify facts against plug-and-play fact sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T16:45:32Z)
• LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation [67.93134176912477]
  Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents. We propose LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question. Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T01:38:02Z)
• FactCHD: Benchmarking Fact-Conflicting Hallucination Detection [64.4610684475899]
  FactCHD is a benchmark designed for the detection of fact-conflicting hallucinations from LLMs. FactCHD features a diverse dataset that spans various factuality patterns, including vanilla, multi-hop, comparison, and set operation. We introduce Truth-Triangulator that synthesizes reflective considerations by tool-enhanced ChatGPT and LoRA-tuning based on Llama2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T16:27:49Z)
• Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation [109.8527403904657]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their knowledge and cannot handle the conflict between internal and external knowledge well. Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries. We propose a simple method to dynamically utilize supporting documents with our judgement strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z)
• Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
  InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections. InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.