Explain the Black Box for the Sake of Science: the Scientific Method in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10557v3
• Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 02:42:18 GMT
• Title: Explain the Black Box for the Sake of Science: the Scientific Method in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Gianmarco Mengaldo,
• Abstract summary: The scientific method is the cornerstone of human progress across all branches of the natural and applied sciences. We argue that human complex reasoning for scientific discovery remains of vital importance, at least before the advent of artificial general intelligence. Knowing what data AI systems deemed important to make decisions can be a point of contact with domain experts and scientists.
• Score: 0.9065034043031668
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The scientific method is the cornerstone of human progress across all branches of the natural and applied sciences, from understanding the human body to explaining how the universe works. The scientific method is based on identifying systematic rules or principles that describe the phenomenon of interest in a reproducible way that can be validated through experimental evidence. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), there are discussions on how AI systems may discover new knowledge. We argue that human complex reasoning for scientific discovery remains of vital importance, at least before the advent of artificial general intelligence. Yet, AI can be leveraged for scientific discovery via explainable AI. More specifically, knowing what data AI systems deemed important to make decisions can be a point of contact with domain experts and scientists, that can lead to divergent or convergent views on a given scientific problem. Divergent views may spark further scientific investigations leading to new scientific knowledge.

Related papers

• Towards a Science Exocortex [0.5687661359570725]
  We review the state of the art in agentic AI systems, and discuss how these methods could be extended to have greater impact on science. A science exocortex could be designed as a swarm of AI agents, with each agent individually streamlining specific researcher tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T14:32:32Z)
• AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
  Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species. Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z)
• DeepSpeed4Science Initiative: Enabling Large-Scale Scientific Discovery through Sophisticated AI System Technologies [116.09762105379241]
  DeepSpeed4Science aims to build unique capabilities through AI system technology innovations. We showcase the early progress we made with DeepSpeed4Science in addressing two of the critical system challenges in structural biology research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T22:05:15Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systems [268.585904751315]
  New area of research known as AI for science (AI4Science) Areas aim at understanding the physical world from subatomic (wavefunctions and electron density), atomic (molecules, proteins, materials, and interactions), to macro (fluids, climate, and subsurface) scales. Key common challenge is how to capture physics first principles, especially symmetries, in natural systems by deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T12:14:14Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Automated Scientific Discovery: From Equation Discovery to Autonomous Discovery Systems [5.7923858184309385]
  The paper surveys automated scientific discovery, from equation discovery and symbolic regression to autonomous discovery systems and agents. We will present closed-loop scientific discovery systems, starting with the pioneering work on the Adam system up to current efforts in fields from material science to astronomy. The maximal level, level five, is defined to require no human intervention at all in the production of scientific knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T16:35:41Z)
• On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence [2.2911874889696775]
  We seek advice from the philosophy of science to understand scientific understanding. Then we collect dozens of anecdotes from scientists about how they acquired new conceptual understanding with the help of computers. For each dimension, we explain new avenues to push beyond the status quo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T13:45:13Z)
• Learning from learning machines: a new generation of AI technology to meet the needs of science [59.261050918992325]
  We outline emerging opportunities and challenges to enhance the utility of AI for scientific discovery. The distinct goals of AI for industry versus the goals of AI for science create tension between identifying patterns in data versus discovering patterns in the world from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T00:55:21Z)
• From Kepler to Newton: Explainable AI-based Paradigm for Science Discovery [16.392568986688595]
  We introduce an Explainable AI-based paradigm for science discovery. To demonstrate the AI-based science discovery process, we show how Kepler's laws of planetary motion and the Newton's law of universal gravitation can be rediscovered by (Explainable) AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T00:45:27Z)
• Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
  A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles. This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)
• To Root Artificial Intelligence Deeply in Basic Science for a New Generation of AI [1.0152838128195467]
  One of the ambitions of artificial intelligence is to root artificial intelligence deeply in basic science. This paper presents the grand challenges of artificial intelligence research for the next 20 years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T22:38:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.