Native Design Bias: Studying the Impact of English Nativeness on Language Model Performance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17385v2
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:15:18 GMT
- Title: Native Design Bias: Studying the Impact of English Nativeness on Language Model Performance
- Authors: Manon Reusens, Philipp Borchert, Jochen De Weerdt, Bart Baesens,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at providing information acquired during pretraining on large-scale corpora.
This study investigates whether the quality of LLM responses varies depending on the demographic profile of users.
- Score: 3.344876133162209
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at providing information acquired during pretraining on large-scale corpora and following instructions through user prompts. This study investigates whether the quality of LLM responses varies depending on the demographic profile of users. Considering English as the global lingua franca, along with the diversity of its dialects among speakers of different native languages, we explore whether non-native English speakers receive lower-quality or even factually incorrect responses from LLMs more frequently. Our results show that performance discrepancies occur when LLMs are prompted by native versus non-native English speakers and persist when comparing native speakers from Western countries with others. Additionally, we find a strong anchoring effect when the model recognizes or is made aware of the user's nativeness, which further degrades the response quality when interacting with non-native speakers. Our analysis is based on a newly collected dataset with over 12,000 unique annotations from 124 annotators, including information on their native language and English proficiency.
Related papers
- Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs)
By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases.
The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z) - An Initial Investigation of Language Adaptation for TTS Systems under Low-resource Scenarios [76.11409260727459]
This paper explores the language adaptation capability of ZMM-TTS, a recent SSL-based multilingual TTS system.
We demonstrate that the similarity in phonetics between the pre-training and target languages, as well as the language category, affects the target language's adaptation performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T08:16:52Z) - Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models [59.627729608055006]
We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence.
We use computation-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena.
As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T17:58:36Z) - Decomposed Prompting: Unveiling Multilingual Linguistic Structure
Knowledge in English-Centric Large Language Models [12.700783525558721]
English-centric Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and LLaMA display a remarkable ability to perform multilingual tasks.
This paper introduces the decomposed prompting approach to probe the linguistic structure understanding of these LLMs in sequence labeling tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T15:15:39Z) - Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for
Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages.
Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba)
We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z) - Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z) - Towards a Deep Multi-layered Dialectal Language Analysis: A Case Study
of African-American English [0.20305676256390934]
Part-of-speech taggers trained on Mainstream American English (MAE) produce non-interpretable results when applied to African American English (AAE)
In this work, we incorporate a human-in-the-loop paradigm to gain a better understanding of AAE speakers' behavior and their language use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-03T01:05:58Z) - Towards Language Modelling in the Speech Domain Using Sub-word
Linguistic Units [56.52704348773307]
We propose a novel LSTM-based generative speech LM based on linguistic units including syllables and phonemes.
With a limited dataset, orders of magnitude smaller than that required by contemporary generative models, our model closely approximates babbling speech.
We show the effect of training with auxiliary text LMs, multitask learning objectives, and auxiliary articulatory features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-31T22:48:30Z) - Can Character-based Language Models Improve Downstream Task Performance
in Low-Resource and Noisy Language Scenarios? [0.0]
We focus on North-African colloquial dialectal Arabic written using an extension of the Latin script, called NArabizi.
We show that a character-based model trained on only 99k sentences of NArabizi and fined-tuned on a small treebank leads to performance close to those obtained with the same architecture pre-trained on large multilingual and monolingual models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T14:59:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.