BioKGBench: A Knowledge Graph Checking Benchmark of AI Agent for Biomedical Science

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00466v1
• Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 15:23:28 GMT
• Title: BioKGBench: A Knowledge Graph Checking Benchmark of AI Agent for Biomedical Science
• Authors: Xinna Lin, Siqi Ma, Junjie Shan, Xiaojing Zhang, Shell Xu Hu, Tiannan Guo, Stan Z. Li, Kaicheng Yu,
• Abstract summary: BioKGBench is an evaluation benchmark for AI-driven biomedical agents. We first disentangle "Understanding Literature" into two atomic abilities. We then formulate a novel agent task, dubbed KGCheck, using KGQA and domain-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation. We collect over two thousand data for two atomic tasks and 225 high-quality annotated data for the agent task.
• Score: 43.624608816218505
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Pursuing artificial intelligence for biomedical science, a.k.a. AI Scientist, draws increasing attention, where one common approach is to build a copilot agent driven by Large Language Models (LLMs). However, to evaluate such systems, people either rely on direct Question-Answering (QA) to the LLM itself, or in a biomedical experimental manner. How to precisely benchmark biomedical agents from an AI Scientist perspective remains largely unexplored. To this end, we draw inspiration from one most important abilities of scientists, understanding the literature, and introduce BioKGBench. In contrast to traditional evaluation benchmark that only focuses on factual QA, where the LLMs are known to have hallucination issues, we first disentangle "Understanding Literature" into two atomic abilities, i) "Understanding" the unstructured text from research papers by performing scientific claim verification, and ii) Ability to interact with structured Knowledge-Graph Question-Answering (KGQA) as a form of "Literature" grounding. We then formulate a novel agent task, dubbed KGCheck, using KGQA and domain-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to identify the factual errors of existing large-scale knowledge graph databases. We collect over two thousand data for two atomic tasks and 225 high-quality annotated data for the agent task. Surprisingly, we discover that state-of-the-art agents, both daily scenarios and biomedical ones, have either failed or inferior performance on our benchmark. We then introduce a simple yet effective baseline, dubbed BKGAgent. On the widely used popular knowledge graph, we discover over 90 factual errors which provide scenarios for agents to make discoveries and demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. The code and data are available at https://github.com/westlake-autolab/BioKGBench.

Related papers

• LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research [1.6312096924271486]
  We introduce the Language Agent Biology Benchmark (LAB-Bench) It is a dataset of over 2,400 multiple choice questions for evaluating AI systems on a range of practical biology research capabilities. We measure performance of several frontier language models against our benchmark and report results compared to human expert biology researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T23:52:25Z)
• BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments [112.25067497985447]
  We introduce BioDiscoveryAgent, an agent that designs new experiments, reasons about their outcomes, and efficiently navigates the hypothesis space to reach desired solutions. BioDiscoveryAgent can uniquely design new experiments without the need to train a machine learning model. It achieves an average of 21% improvement in predicting relevant genetic perturbations across six datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T19:57:17Z)
• Diversifying Knowledge Enhancement of Biomedical Language Models using Adapter Modules and Knowledge Graphs [54.223394825528665]
  We develop an approach that uses lightweight adapter modules to inject structured biomedical knowledge into pre-trained language models. We use two large KGs, the biomedical knowledge system UMLS and the novel biochemical OntoChem, with two prominent biomedical PLMs, PubMedBERT and BioLinkBERT. We show that our methodology leads to performance improvements in several instances while keeping requirements in computing power low.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T14:26:57Z)
• PaperQA: Retrieval-Augmented Generative Agent for Scientific Research [41.9628176602676]
  We present PaperQA, a RAG agent for answering questions over the scientific literature. PaperQA is an agent that performs information retrieval across full-text scientific articles, assesses the relevance of sources and passages, and uses RAG to provide answers. We also introduce LitQA, a more complex benchmark that requires retrieval and synthesis of information from full-text scientific papers across the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:50:20Z)
• Knowledge-injected Prompt Learning for Chinese Biomedical Entity Normalization [6.927883826415262]
  We propose a novel Knowledge-injected Prompt Learning (PL-Knowledge) method to tackle the Biomedical Entity Normalization (BEN) task. Specifically, our approach consists of five stages: candidate entity matching, knowledge extraction, knowledge encoding, knowledge injection, and prediction output. By effectively encoding the knowledge items contained in medical entities, the additional knowledge enhances the model's ability to capture latent relationships between medical entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:32:40Z)
• BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks [68.39821375903591]
  Generalist AI holds the potential to address limitations due to its versatility in interpreting different data types. Here, we propose BiomedGPT, the first open-source and lightweight vision-language foundation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T17:14:43Z)
• BioRED: A Comprehensive Biomedical Relation Extraction Dataset [6.915371362219944]
  We present BioRED, a first-of-its-kind biomedical RE corpus with multiple entity types and relation pairs. We label each relation as describing either a novel finding or previously known background knowledge, enabling automated algorithms to differentiate between novel and background information. Our results show that while existing approaches can reach high performance on the NER task, there is much room for improvement for the RE task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T19:23:49Z)
• The Digitalization of Bioassays in the Open Research Knowledge Graph [6.508148285794385]
  ORKG-assays is an AI micro-service written in Python designed to assist scientists obtain semantified bioassays as a set of triples. It uses an AI-based clustering algorithm which on gold-standard evaluations over 900 bioassays with 5,514 unique property-value pairs for 103 predicates shows competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T08:35:01Z)
• Scientific Language Models for Biomedical Knowledge Base Completion: An Empirical Study [62.376800537374024]
  We study scientific LMs for KG completion, exploring whether we can tap into their latent knowledge to enhance biomedical link prediction. We integrate the LM-based models with KG embedding models, using a router method that learns to assign each input example to either type of model and provides a substantial boost in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T17:55:33Z)
• CBLUE: A Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark [51.38557174322772]
  We present the first Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark. It is a collection of natural language understanding tasks including named entity recognition, information extraction, clinical diagnosis normalization, single-sentence/sentence-pair classification. We report empirical results with the current 11 pre-trained Chinese models, and experimental results show that state-of-the-art neural models perform by far worse than the human ceiling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T12:25:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.