Optimization of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Context with Outlier Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01403v1
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:53:29 GMT
• Title: Optimization of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Context with Outlier Detection
• Authors: Vitaly Bulgakov,
• Abstract summary: We focus on methods to reduce the size and improve the quality of the prompt context required for question-answering systems. Our goal is to select the most semantically relevant documents, treating the discarded ones as outliers. It was found that the greatest improvements were achieved with increasing complexity of the questions and answers.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we focus on methods to reduce the size and improve the quality of the prompt context required for question-answering systems. Attempts to increase the number of retrieved chunked documents and thereby enlarge the context related to the query can significantly complicate the processing and decrease the performance of a Large Language Model (LLM) when generating responses to queries. It is well known that a large set of documents retrieved from a database in response to a query may contain irrelevant information, which often leads to hallucinations in the resulting answers. Our goal is to select the most semantically relevant documents, treating the discarded ones as outliers. We propose and evaluate several methods for identifying outliers by creating features that utilize the distances of embedding vectors, retrieved from the vector database, to both the centroid and the query vectors. The methods were evaluated by comparing the similarities of the retrieved LLM responses to ground-truth answers obtained using the OpenAI GPT-4o model. It was found that the greatest improvements were achieved with increasing complexity of the questions and answers.

Related papers

• Can we Retrieve Everything All at Once? ARM: An Alignment-Oriented LLM-based Retrieval Method [48.14236175156835]
  ARM aims to better align the question with the organization of the data collection by exploring relationships among data objects. It outperforms standard RAG with query decomposition by up to 5.2 pt in execution accuracy and agentic RAG (ReAct) by up to 15.9 pt. It achieves up to 5.5 pt and 19.3 pt higher F1 match scores compared to these approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:07:19Z)
• Re-ranking the Context for Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation [28.63893944806149]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge to generate a response within a context. RAG systems face unique challenges: (i) the retrieval process may select irrelevant entries to user query (e.g., images, documents), and (ii) vision-language models or multi-modal language models like GPT-4o may hallucinate when processing these entries to generate RAG output. We show that by using a more advanced relevancy measure, one can enhance the retrieval process by selecting more relevant pieces from the knowledge-base and eliminate
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:58:22Z)
• ScopeQA: A Framework for Generating Out-of-Scope Questions for RAG [52.33835101586687]
  Conversational AI agents use Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to provide verifiable document-grounded responses to user inquiries. This paper presents a novel guided hallucination-based method to efficiently generate a diverse set of borderline out-of-scope confusing questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:11:29Z)
• Enhancing Long Context Performance in LLMs Through Inner Loop Query Mechanism [2.919891871101241]
  Transformers have a quadratic scaling of computational complexity with input size. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can better handle longer contexts by using a retrieval system. We introduce a novel approach, Inner Loop Memory Augmented Tree Retrieval (ILM-TR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T19:49:05Z)
• Optimizing Query Generation for Enhanced Document Retrieval in RAG [53.10369742545479]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various language tasks but they often generate incorrect information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to mitigate this by using document retrieval for accurate responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T05:50:32Z)
• Better RAG using Relevant Information Gain [1.5604249682593647]
  A common way to extend the memory of large language models (LLMs) is by retrieval augmented generation (RAG) We propose a novel simple optimization metric based on relevant information gain, a probabilistic measure of the total information relevant to a query for a set of retrieved results. When used as a drop-in replacement for the retrieval component of a RAG system, this method yields state-of-the-art performance on question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T18:09:21Z)
• BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval [54.54576644403115]
  Many complex real-world queries require in-depth reasoning to identify relevant documents. We introduce BRIGHT, the first text retrieval benchmark that requires intensive reasoning to retrieve relevant documents. Our dataset consists of 1,384 real-world queries spanning diverse domains, such as economics, psychology, mathematics, and coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:58:27Z)
• DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering [4.364937306005719]
  RAG has recently demonstrated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the knowledge-intensive tasks such as Question-Answering (QA) We have found that even though there is low relevance between some critical documents and query, it is possible to retrieve the remaining documents by combining parts of the documents with the query. A two-stage retrieval framework called Dynamic-Relevant Retrieval-Augmented Generation (DR-RAG) is proposed to improve document retrieval recall and the accuracy of answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T15:15:33Z)
• Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity [59.57065228857247]
  Retrieval-augmented Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to enhancing response accuracy in several tasks, such as Question-Answering (QA) We propose a novel adaptive QA framework, that can dynamically select the most suitable strategy for (retrieval-augmented) LLMs based on the query complexity. We validate our model on a set of open-domain QA datasets, covering multiple query complexities, and show that ours enhances the overall efficiency and accuracy of QA systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:52:30Z)
• Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation [36.04062963574603]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies heavily on relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong. We propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation. CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T04:36:39Z)
• Query Focused Multi-Document Summarization with Distant Supervision [88.39032981994535]
  Existing work relies heavily on retrieval-style methods for estimating the relevance between queries and text segments. We propose a coarse-to-fine modeling framework which introduces separate modules for estimating whether segments are relevant to the query. We demonstrate that our framework outperforms strong comparison systems on standard QFS benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T22:35:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.