Footprints of Data in a Classifier: Understanding the Privacy Risks and Solution Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02268v2
• Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:36:16 GMT
• Title: Footprints of Data in a Classifier: Understanding the Privacy Risks and Solution Strategies
• Authors: Payel Sadhukhan, Tanujit Chakraborty,
• Abstract summary: Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation (Right Erasure) requires data to be permanently removed from a system to prevent potential compromise.<n>One such issue arises from the residual footprints of training data embedded within predictive models.<n>This study examines how two fundamental aspects of classifier systems - training quality and classifier training methodology - contribute to privacy vulnerabilities.
• Score: 0.9208007322096533
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across government and private industries brings both advancements and heightened privacy and security concerns. Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) mandates the Right to Erasure, requiring data to be permanently removed from a system to prevent potential compromise. While existing research primarily focuses on erasing sensitive data attributes, several passive data compromise mechanisms remain underexplored and unaddressed. One such issue arises from the residual footprints of training data embedded within predictive models. Performance disparities between test and training data can inadvertently reveal which data points were part of the training set, posing a privacy risk. This study examines how two fundamental aspects of classifier systems - training data quality and classifier training methodology - contribute to privacy vulnerabilities. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that classifiers exhibit universal vulnerability under conditions of data imbalance and distributional shifts. Empirical findings reinforce our theoretical results, highlighting the significant role of training data quality in classifier susceptibility. Additionally, our study reveals that a classifier's operational mechanism and architectural design impact its vulnerability. We further investigate mitigation strategies through data obfuscation techniques and analyze their impact on both privacy and classification performance. To aid practitioners, we introduce a privacy-performance trade-off index, providing a structured approach to balancing privacy protection with model effectiveness. The findings offer valuable insights for selecting classifiers and curating training data in diverse real-world applications.

Related papers

• FEDLAD: Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses [50.921333548391345]
  Federated Learning is a privacy preserving decentralized machine learning paradigm. Recent research has revealed that private ground truth data can be recovered through a gradient technique known as Deep Leakage. This paper introduces the FEDLAD Framework (Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Deep Leakage attacks and defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:42:26Z)
• Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile [48.71651033308842]
  We introduce two novel adversarial unlearning processes capable of circumventing both types of verification strategies. This study highlights the vulnerabilities and limitations in machine unlearning verification, paving the way for further research into the safety of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T21:37:10Z)
• Silver Linings in the Shadows: Harnessing Membership Inference for Machine Unlearning [7.557226714828334]
  We present a novel unlearning mechanism designed to remove the impact of specific data samples from a neural network. In achieving this goal, we crafted a novel loss function tailored to eliminate privacy-sensitive information from weights and activation values of the target model. Our results showcase the superior performance of our approach in terms of unlearning efficacy and latency as well as the fidelity of the primary task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T00:20:26Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• FewFedPIT: Towards Privacy-preserving and Few-shot Federated Instruction Tuning [54.26614091429253]
  Federated instruction tuning (FedIT) is a promising solution, by consolidating collaborative training across multiple data owners. FedIT encounters limitations such as scarcity of instructional data and risk of exposure to training data extraction attacks. We propose FewFedPIT, designed to simultaneously enhance privacy protection and model performance of federated few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T08:41:22Z)
• Approximate, Adapt, Anonymize (3A): a Framework for Privacy Preserving Training Data Release for Machine Learning [3.29354893777827]
  We introduce a data release framework, 3A (Approximate, Adapt, Anonymize), to maximize data utility for machine learning. We present experimental evidence showing minimal discrepancy between performance metrics of models trained on real versus privatized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T18:37:11Z)
• Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarks [70.39633252935445]
  Data contamination has become prevalent and challenging with the rise of models pretrained on large automatically-crawled corpora. For closed models, the training data becomes a trade secret, and even for open models, it is not trivial to detect contamination. We propose three strategies that can make a difference: (1) Test data made public should be encrypted with a public key and licensed to disallow derivative distribution; (2) demand training exclusion controls from closed API holders, and protect your test data by refusing to evaluate without them; and (3) avoid data which appears with its solution on the internet, and release the web-page context of internet-derived
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T12:23:38Z)
• It Is All About Data: A Survey on the Effects of Data on Adversarial Robustness [4.1310970179750015]
  Adversarial examples are inputs to machine learning models that an attacker has intentionally designed to confuse the model into making a mistake. To address this problem, the area of adversarial robustness investigates mechanisms behind adversarial attacks and defenses against these attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T04:18:03Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks against Synthetic Data through Overfitting Detection [84.02632160692995]
  We argue for a realistic MIA setting that assumes the attacker has some knowledge of the underlying data distribution. We propose DOMIAS, a density-based MIA model that aims to infer membership by targeting local overfitting of the generative model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T11:27:39Z)
• A Survey on Differential Privacy with Machine Learning and Future Outlook [0.0]
  differential privacy is used to protect machine learning models from any attacks and vulnerabilities. This survey paper presents different differentially private machine learning algorithms categorized into two main categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T14:20:53Z)
• Striving for data-model efficiency: Identifying data externalities on group performance [75.17591306911015]
  Building trustworthy, effective, and responsible machine learning systems hinges on understanding how differences in training data and modeling decisions interact to impact predictive performance. We focus on a particular type of data-model inefficiency, in which adding training data from some sources can actually lower performance evaluated on key sub-groups of the population. Our results indicate that data-efficiency is a key component of both accurate and trustworthy machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T16:48:27Z)
• Uncertainty-Autoencoder-Based Privacy and Utility Preserving Data Type Conscious Transformation [3.7315964084413173]
  We propose an adversarial learning framework that deals with the privacy-utility tradeoff problem under two conditions. Under data-type ignorant conditions, the privacy mechanism provides a one-hot encoding of categorical features, representing exactly one class. Under data-type aware conditions, the categorical variables are represented by a collection of scores, one for each class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T08:40:15Z)
• Towards a Data Privacy-Predictive Performance Trade-off [2.580765958706854]
  We evaluate the existence of a trade-off between data privacy and predictive performance in classification tasks. Unlike previous literature, we confirm that the higher the level of privacy, the higher the impact on predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-13T21:48:51Z)
• Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models [9.26208227402571]
  Membership inference attacks are used to quantify the private information that a model leaks about the individual data points in its training set. We derive new attack algorithms that can achieve a high AUC score while also highlighting the different factors that affect their performance. Our algorithms capture a very precise approximation of privacy loss in models, and can be used as a tool to perform an accurate and informed estimation of privacy risk in machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T13:31:22Z)
• Federated Test-Time Adaptive Face Presentation Attack Detection with Dual-Phase Privacy Preservation [100.69458267888962]
  Face presentation attack detection (fPAD) plays a critical role in the modern face recognition pipeline. Due to legal and privacy issues, training data (real face images and spoof images) are not allowed to be directly shared between different data sources. We propose a Federated Test-Time Adaptive Face Presentation Attack Detection with Dual-Phase Privacy Preservation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T02:51:05Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning on Partitioned Attributes [6.661716208346423]
  Federated learning empowers collaborative training without exposing local data or models. We introduce an adversarial learning based procedure which tunes a local model to release privacy-preserving intermediate representations. To alleviate the accuracy decline, we propose a defense method based on the forward-backward splitting algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T14:49:14Z)
• Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses [150.64470864162556]
  This work systematically categorizes and discusses a wide range of dataset vulnerabilities and exploits. In addition to describing various poisoning and backdoor threat models and the relationships among them, we develop their unified taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-18T22:38:47Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach [54.32266555843765]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T10:50:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.