Minds, Brains, AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02495v1
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:49:42 GMT
- Title: Minds, Brains, AI
- Authors: Jay Seitz,
- Abstract summary: In the last year or so there has been extensive claims by major computational scientists, engineers, and others that AGI, artificial general intelligence, is five or ten years away, but without a scintilla of scientific evidence, for a broad body of these claims.
This article reviews evidence for the following three propositions using extensive body of scientific research and related sources from the cognitive and neurosciences, evolutionary evidence, linguistics, data science, comparative psychology, self-driving cars, robotics, and the learning sciences.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In the last year or so and going back many decades there has been extensive claims by major computational scientists, engineers, and others that AGI, artificial general intelligence, is five or ten years away, but without a scintilla of scientific evidence, for a broad body of these claims. Computers will become conscious, have a theory of mind, think and reason, will become more intelligent than humans, and so on. But the claims are science fiction, not science. This article reviews evidence for the following three propositions using extensive body of scientific research and related sources from the cognitive and neurosciences, evolutionary evidence, linguistics, data science, comparative psychology, self-driving cars, robotics. and the learning sciences. (1) Do computing machines think or reason? (2) Are computing machines sentient or conscious? (3) Do computing machines have a theory of mind?
Related papers
- Artificial Intelligence without Restriction Surpassing Human Intelligence with Probability One: Theoretical Insight into Secrets of the Brain with AI Twins of the Brain [20.956507640605093]
One fundamental question which would affect human sustainability remains open: Will artificial intelligence (AI) evolve to surpass human intelligence in the future?
This paper shows that in theory new AI twins with fresh cellular level of AI techniques for neuroscience could approximate the brain and its functioning systems.
This paper indirectly proves the validity of the conjecture made by Frank Rosenblatt 70 years ago about the potential capabilities of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-04T13:17:44Z) - Explain the Black Box for the Sake of Science: the Scientific Method in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence [0.9065034043031668]
The scientific method is the cornerstone of human progress across all branches of the natural and applied sciences.
We argue that human complex reasoning for scientific discovery remains of vital importance, at least before the advent of artificial general intelligence.
Knowing what data AI systems deemed important to make decisions can be a point of contact with domain experts and scientists.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-15T08:34:42Z) - AI Consciousness is Inevitable: A Theoretical Computer Science Perspective [0.0]
We look at consciousness through the lens of Theoretical Computer Science, a branch of mathematics that studies computation under resource limitations.
We develop a formal machine model for consciousness inspired by Alan Turing's simple yet powerful model of computation and Bernard Baars' theater model of consciousness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T18:38:54Z) - Machine learning and information theory concepts towards an AI
Mathematician [77.63761356203105]
The current state-of-the-art in artificial intelligence is impressive, especially in terms of mastery of language, but not so much in terms of mathematical reasoning.
This essay builds on the idea that current deep learning mostly succeeds at system 1 abilities.
It takes an information-theoretical posture to ask questions about what constitutes an interesting mathematical statement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T15:12:06Z) - AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species.
Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z) - Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing? [71.84486326350338]
We show that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations.
In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-03T19:10:45Z) - Genes in Intelligent Agents [45.93363823594323]
Animals are born with some intelligence encoded in their genes, but machines lack such intelligence and learn from scratch.
Inspired by the genes of animals, we define the genes'' of machines named as the learngenes'' and propose the Genetic Reinforcement Learning (GRL)
GRL is a computational framework that simulates the evolution of organisms in reinforcement learning (RL) and leverages the learngenes to learn and evolve the intelligence agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-17T01:24:11Z) - On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence [2.2911874889696775]
We seek advice from the philosophy of science to understand scientific understanding.
Then we collect dozens of anecdotes from scientists about how they acquired new conceptual understanding with the help of computers.
For each dimension, we explain new avenues to push beyond the status quo.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-04T13:45:13Z) - Learning from learning machines: a new generation of AI technology to
meet the needs of science [59.261050918992325]
We outline emerging opportunities and challenges to enhance the utility of AI for scientific discovery.
The distinct goals of AI for industry versus the goals of AI for science create tension between identifying patterns in data versus discovering patterns in the world from data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-27T00:55:21Z) - Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles.
This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing.
The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z) - To Root Artificial Intelligence Deeply in Basic Science for a New
Generation of AI [1.0152838128195467]
One of the ambitions of artificial intelligence is to root artificial intelligence deeply in basic science.
This paper presents the grand challenges of artificial intelligence research for the next 20 years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-11T22:38:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.