Mast Kalandar at SemEval-2024 Task 8: On the Trail of Textual Origins: RoBERTa-BiLSTM Approach to Detect AI-Generated Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02978v1
• Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:22:23 GMT
• Title: Mast Kalandar at SemEval-2024 Task 8: On the Trail of Textual Origins: RoBERTa-BiLSTM Approach to Detect AI-Generated Text
• Authors: Jainit Sushil Bafna, Hardik Mittal, Suyash Sethia, Manish Shrivastava, Radhika Mamidi,
• Abstract summary: SemEval 2024 introduces the task of Multigenerator, Multidomain, and Multilingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection. We propose a RoBERTa-BiLSTM based classifier designed to classify text into two categories: AI-generated or human. Our architecture ranked 46th on the official leaderboard with an accuracy of 80.83 among 125.
• Score: 7.959800630494841
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased impressive abilities in generating fluent responses to diverse user queries. However, concerns regarding the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, educational, and academic contexts have surfaced. SemEval 2024 introduces the task of Multigenerator, Multidomain, and Multilingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection, aiming to develop automated systems for identifying machine-generated text and detecting potential misuse. In this paper, we i) propose a RoBERTa-BiLSTM based classifier designed to classify text into two categories: AI-generated or human ii) conduct a comparative study of our model with baseline approaches to evaluate its effectiveness. This paper contributes to the advancement of automatic text detection systems in addressing the challenges posed by machine-generated text misuse. Our architecture ranked 46th on the official leaderboard with an accuracy of 80.83 among 125.

Related papers

• RKadiyala at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Black-Box Word-Level Text Boundary Detection in Partially Machine Generated Texts [0.0]
  This paper introduces few reliable approaches for identifying which part of a given text is machine generated at a word level. We present a comparison with proprietary systems, performance of our model on unseen domains' and generators' texts. The findings reveal significant improvements in detection accuracy along with comparison on other aspects of detection capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T03:21:59Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables [54.07946647012579]
  Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:09Z)
• LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection [87.43727192273772]
  It is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated. We present LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection. It supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T07:43:17Z)
• Sharif-MGTD at SemEval-2024 Task 8: A Transformer-Based Approach to Detect Machine Generated Text [2.2039952888743253]
  MGT has emerged as a significant area of study within Natural Language Processing. In this research, we explore the effectiveness of fine-tuning a RoBERTa-base transformer, a powerful neural architecture, to address MGT detection. Our proposed system achieves an accuracy of 78.9% on the test dataset, positioning us at 57th among participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:33:01Z)
• AISPACE at SemEval-2024 task 8: A Class-balanced Soft-voting System for Detecting Multi-generator Machine-generated Text [0.0]
  SemEval-2024 Task 8 provides a challenge to detect human-written and machine-generated text. This paper proposes a system that mainly deals with Subtask B. It aims to detect if given full text is written by human or is generated by a specific Large Language Model (LLM), which is actually a multi-class text classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T06:25:47Z)
• TrustAI at SemEval-2024 Task 8: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multi-domain Machine Generated Text Detection Techniques [2.149586323955579]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generate fluent content across a wide spectrum of user queries. This capability has raised concerns regarding misinformation and personal information leakage. We present our methods for the SemEval2024 Task8, aiming to detect machine-generated text across various domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T10:09:03Z)
• Deciphering Textual Authenticity: A Generalized Strategy through the Lens of Large Language Semantics for Detecting Human vs. Machine-Generated Text [8.290557547578146]
  We introduce a novel system, T5LLMCipher, for detecting machine-generated text using a pretrained T5 encoder combined with LLM embedding sub-clustering. We find that our approach provides state-of-the-art generalization ability, with an average increase in F1 score on machine-generated text of 19.6% on unseen generators and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T18:45:13Z)
• Deliberate then Generate: Enhanced Prompting Framework for Text Generation [70.10319005141888]
  Deliberate then Generate (DTG) prompting framework consists of error detection instructions and candidates that may contain errors. We conduct extensive experiments on 20+ datasets across 7 text generation tasks, including summarization, translation, dialogue, and more. We show that DTG consistently outperforms existing prompting methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple text generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T13:23:04Z)
• M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection [69.29017069438228]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability to generate fluent responses to a wide variety of user queries. This has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of such texts in journalism, education, and academia. In this study, we strive to create automated systems that can detect machine-generated texts and pinpoint potential misuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:55:11Z)
• MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild [82.70561073277801]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection. We build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:13:29Z)
• On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
  We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases. We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.