Robust CATE Estimation Using Novel Ensemble Methods
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03690v3
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:28:04 GMT
- Title: Robust CATE Estimation Using Novel Ensemble Methods
- Authors: Oshri Machluf, Tzviel Frostig, Gal Shoham, Tomer Milo, Elad Berkman, Raviv Pryluk,
- Abstract summary: estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) is crucial for understanding the heterogeneity of treatment effects in clinical trials.
We evaluate the performance of common methods, including causal forests and various meta-learners, across a diverse set of scenarios.
We propose two new ensemble methods that integrate multiple estimators to enhance prediction stability and performance.
- Score: 0.8246494848934447
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) is crucial for understanding the heterogeneity of treatment effects in clinical trials. We evaluate the performance of common methods, including causal forests and various meta-learners, across a diverse set of scenarios, revealing that each of the methods struggles in one or more of the tested scenarios. Given the inherent uncertainty of the data-generating process in real-life scenarios, the robustness of a CATE estimator to various scenarios is critical for its reliability. To address this limitation of existing methods, we propose two new ensemble methods that integrate multiple estimators to enhance prediction stability and performance - Stacked X-Learner which uses the X-Learner with model stacking for estimating the nuisance functions, and Consensus Based Averaging (CBA), which averages only the models with highest internal agreement. We show that these models achieve good performance across a wide range of scenarios varying in complexity, sample size and structure of the underlying-mechanism, including a biologically driven model for PD-L1 inhibition pathway for cancer treatment. Furthermore, we demonstrate improved performance by the Stacked X-Learner also when comparing to other ensemble methods, including R-Stacking, Causal-Stacking and others.
Related papers
- Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning [27.28511396131235]
We introduce a model-agnostic data augmentation method that imputes the counterfactual outcomes for a selected subset of individuals.
We use contrastive learning to learn a representation space and a similarity measure such that in the learned representation space close individuals identified by the learned similarity measure have similar potential outcomes.
This property ensures reliable imputation of counterfactual outcomes for the individuals with close neighbors from the alternative treatment group.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T00:36:51Z) - Provably Efficient UCB-type Algorithms For Learning Predictive State
Representations [55.00359893021461]
The sequential decision-making problem is statistically learnable if it admits a low-rank structure modeled by predictive state representations (PSRs)
This paper proposes the first known UCB-type approach for PSRs, featuring a novel bonus term that upper bounds the total variation distance between the estimated and true models.
In contrast to existing approaches for PSRs, our UCB-type algorithms enjoy computational tractability, last-iterate guaranteed near-optimal policy, and guaranteed model accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-01T18:35:21Z) - B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under
Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding.
We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z) - The effectiveness of factorization and similarity blending [0.0]
Collaborative Filtering (CF) is a technique which allows to leverage past users' preferences data to identify behavioural patterns and exploit them to predict custom recommendations.
We show that blending factorization-based and similarity-based approaches can lead to a significant error decrease (-9.4%) on stand-alone models.
We propose a novel extension of a similarity model, SCSR, which consistently reduce the complexity of the original algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-16T13:11:27Z) - Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average
treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system.
This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions.
We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z) - Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment
Effects [62.44901952244514]
The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects.
In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE)
We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z) - Active Learning-Based Multistage Sequential Decision-Making Model with
Application on Common Bile Duct Stone Evaluation [8.296821186083974]
Multistage sequential decision-making scenarios are commonly seen in the healthcare diagnosis process.
In this paper, an active learning-based method is developed to actively collect only the necessary patient data in a sequential manner.
The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated in both a simulation study and a real case study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-13T06:42:12Z) - Performance Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks: Discrepancies and
Solutions [51.8695223602729]
adversarial attack methods have been developed to challenge the robustness of machine learning models.
We propose a Piece-wise Sampling Curving (PSC) toolkit to effectively address the discrepancy.
PSC toolkit offers options for balancing the computational cost and evaluation effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-22T14:36:51Z) - Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with
Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models.
In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method.
We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z) - Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit
estimators [77.34726150561087]
Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties.
We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE)
When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.