Measuring Variable Importance in Individual Treatment Effect Estimation with High Dimensional Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13002v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 11:44:07 GMT
• Title: Measuring Variable Importance in Individual Treatment Effect Estimation with High Dimensional Data
• Authors: Joseph Paillard, Vitaliy Kolodyazhniy, Bertrand Thirion, Denis A. Engemann,
• Abstract summary: Causal machine learning (ML) promises to provide powerful tools for estimating individual treatment effects. ML methods still face the significant challenge of interpretability, which is crucial for medical applications. We propose a new algorithm based on the Conditional Permutation Importance (CPI) method for statistically rigorous variable importance assessment.
• Score: 35.104681814241104
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal machine learning (ML) promises to provide powerful tools for estimating individual treatment effects. Although causal ML methods are now well established, they still face the significant challenge of interpretability, which is crucial for medical applications. In this work, we propose a new algorithm based on the Conditional Permutation Importance (CPI) method for statistically rigorous variable importance assessment in the context of Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation. Our method termed PermuCATE is agnostic to both the meta-learner and the ML model used. Through theoretical analysis and empirical studies, we show that this approach provides a reliable measure of variable importance and exhibits lower variance compared to the standard Leave-One-Covariate-Out (LOCO) method. We illustrate how this property leads to increased statistical power, which is crucial for the application of explainable ML in small sample sizes or high-dimensional settings. We empirically demonstrate the benefits of our approach in various simulation scenarios, including previously proposed benchmarks as well as more complex settings with high-dimensional and correlated variables that require advanced CATE estimators.

Related papers

• A Gradient Analysis Framework for Rewarding Good and Penalizing Bad Examples in Language Models [63.949883238901414]
  We present a unique angle of gradient analysis of loss functions that simultaneously reward good examples and penalize bad ones in LMs. We find that ExMATE serves as a superior surrogate for MLE, and that combining DPO with ExMATE instead of MLE further enhances both the statistical (5-7%) and generative (+18% win rate) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:46:18Z)
• Quantifying Emergence in Large Language Models [31.608080868988825]
  We propose a quantifiable solution for estimating emergence of LLMs. Inspired by emergentism in dynamics, we quantify the strength of emergence by comparing the entropy reduction of the macroscopic (semantic) level with that of the microscopic (token) level. Our method demonstrates consistent behaviors across a suite of LMs under both in-context learning (ICL) and natural sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T09:12:20Z)
• Statistical Agnostic Regression: a machine learning method to validate regression models [0.0]
  We introduce Statistical Agnostic Regression (SAR) for evaluating the statistical significance of machine learning (ML)-based linear regression models. We define a threshold that ensures there is sufficient evidence, with a probability of at least $1-eta$, to conclude the existence of a linear relationship in the population between the explanatory (feature) and the response (label) variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T09:19:26Z)
• Hyperparameter Tuning for Causal Inference with Double Machine Learning: A Simulation Study [4.526082390949313]
  We empirically assess the relationship between the predictive performance of machine learning methods and the resulting causal estimation. We conduct an extensive simulation study using data from the 2019 Atlantic Causal Inference Conference Data Challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T09:01:51Z)
• To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
  Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs. We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting. Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z)
• Building Robust Machine Learning Models for Small Chemical Science Data: The Case of Shear Viscosity [3.4761212729163313]
  We train several Machine Learning models to predict the shear viscosity of a Lennard-Jones (LJ) fluid. Specifically, the issues related to model selection, performance estimation and uncertainty quantification were investigated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T07:33:14Z)
• Provable Generalization of Overparameterized Meta-learning Trained with SGD [62.892930625034374]
  We study the generalization of a widely used meta-learning approach, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) We provide both upper and lower bounds for the excess risk of MAML, which captures how SGD dynamics affect these generalization bounds. Our theoretical findings are further validated by experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-18T07:22:57Z)
• Tight Mutual Information Estimation With Contrastive Fenchel-Legendre Optimization [69.07420650261649]
  We introduce a novel, simple, and powerful contrastive MI estimator named as FLO. Empirically, our FLO estimator overcomes the limitations of its predecessors and learns more efficiently. The utility of FLO is verified using an extensive set of benchmarks, which also reveals the trade-offs in practical MI estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T15:20:41Z)
• Estimating Average Treatment Effects with Support Vector Machines [77.34726150561087]
  Support vector machine (SVM) is one of the most popular classification algorithms in the machine learning literature. We adapt SVM as a kernel-based weighting procedure that minimizes the maximum mean discrepancy between the treatment and control groups. We characterize the bias of causal effect estimation arising from this trade-off, connecting the proposed SVM procedure to the existing kernel balancing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T20:22:56Z)
• Localized Debiased Machine Learning: Efficient Inference on Quantile Treatment Effects and Beyond [69.83813153444115]
  We consider an efficient estimating equation for the (local) quantile treatment effect ((L)QTE) in causal inference. Debiased machine learning (DML) is a data-splitting approach to estimating high-dimensional nuisances. We propose localized debiased machine learning (LDML), which avoids this burdensome step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-30T14:42:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.