Beyond Perplexity: Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation of LLM Compression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04965v3
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 22:43:36 GMT
• Title: Beyond Perplexity: Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation of LLM Compression
• Authors: Zhichao Xu, Ashim Gupta, Tao Li, Oliver Bentham, Vivek Srikumar,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the impact of model compression on four dimensions: (1) degeneration harm, i.e., bias and toxicity in generation; (2) representational harm, i.e., biases in discriminative tasks; (3) dialect bias; and(4) language modeling and downstream task performance. Our analysis reveals that compression can lead to unexpected consequences.
• Score: 33.45167213570976
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Increasingly, model compression techniques enable large language models (LLMs) to be deployed in real-world applications. As a result of this momentum towards local deployment, compressed LLMs will interact with a large population. Prior work on compression typically prioritize preserving perplexity, which is directly analogous to training loss. The impact of compression method on other critical aspects of model behavior\, -- \,particularly safety\, -- \,requires systematic assessment. To this end, we investigate the impact of model compression along four dimensions: (1) degeneration harm, i.e., bias and toxicity in generation; (2) representational harm, i.e., biases in discriminative tasks; (3) dialect bias; and(4) language modeling and downstream task performance. We examine a wide spectrum of LLM compression techniques, including unstructured pruning, semi-structured pruning, and quantization. Our analysis reveals that compression can lead to unexpected consequences. Although compression may unintentionally alleviate LLMs' degeneration harm, it can still exacerbate representational harm. Furthermore, increasing compression produces a divergent impact on different protected groups. Finally, different compression methods have drastically different safety impacts: for example, quantization mostly preserves bias while pruning degrades quickly. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating safety assessments into the development of compressed LLMs to ensure their reliability across real-world applications.\footnote{Our implementation and results are available here: \url{https://github.com/zhichaoxu-shufe/Beyond-Perplexity-Compression-Safety-Eval}}

Related papers

• EvoPress: Towards Optimal Dynamic Model Compression via Evolutionary Search [33.86918407429272]
  We propose a new and general approach for dynamic compression that is provably optimal in a given input range. We show that these theoretical guarantees lead to highly competitive practical performance for dynamic compression of Llama, Mistral and Phi models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:46:37Z)
• LoRC: Low-Rank Compression for LLMs KV Cache with a Progressive Compression Strategy [59.1298692559785]
  Key-Value ( KV) cache is crucial component in serving transformer-based autoregressive large language models (LLMs) Existing approaches to mitigate this issue include: (1) efficient attention variants integrated in upcycling stages; (2) KV cache compression at test time; and (3) KV cache compression at test time. We propose a low-rank approximation of KV weight matrices, allowing plug-in integration with existing transformer-based LLMs without model retraining. Our method is designed to function without model tuning in upcycling stages or task-specific profiling in test stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T03:10:53Z)
• In-Context Former: Lightning-fast Compressing Context for Large Language Model [48.831304302467004]
  In this paper, we propose a new approach to compress the long input contexts of Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) We use the cross-attention mechanism and a small number of learnable digest tokens to condense information from the contextual word embeddings. Experimental results indicate that our method requires only 1/32 of the floating-point operations of the baseline during compression and improves processing speed by 68 to 112 times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T15:14:55Z)
• The Cost of Compression: Investigating the Impact of Compression on Parametric Knowledge in Language Models [11.156816338995503]
  Large language models (LLMs) provide faster inference, smaller memory footprints, and enables local deployment. Two standard compression techniques are pruning and quantization, with the former eliminating redundant connections in model layers and the latter representing model parameters with fewer bits. Existing research on LLM compression primarily focuses on performance in terms of general metrics like perplexity or downstream task accuracy. More fine-grained metrics, such as those measuring parametric knowledge, remain significantly underexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T22:27:12Z)
• Compressing LLMs: The Truth is Rarely Pure and Never Simple [90.05366363633568]
  Knowledge-Intensive Compressed LLM BenchmarK aims to redefine the evaluation protocol for compressed Large Language Models. LLM-KICK unveils many favorable merits and unfortunate plights of current SoTA compression methods. LLM-KICK is designed to holistically access compressed LLMs' ability for language understanding, reasoning, generation, in-context retrieval, in-context summarization, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:42:37Z)
• Safety and Performance, Why not Both? Bi-Objective Optimized Model Compression toward AI Software Deployment [12.153709321048947]
  AI software compression plays a crucial role, which aims to compress model size while keeping high performance. In this paper, we try to address the safe model compression problem from a safety-performance co-optimization perspective. Specifically, inspired by the test-driven development (TDD) paradigm in software engineering, we propose a test-driven sparse training framework called SafeCompress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T04:41:08Z)
• Compression of Generative Pre-trained Language Models via Quantization [62.80110048377957]
  We find that previous quantization methods fail on generative tasks due to the textithomogeneous word embeddings We propose a token-level contrastive distillation to learn distinguishable word embeddings, and a module-wise dynamic scaling to make quantizers adaptive to different modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T02:11:35Z)
• What do Compressed Large Language Models Forget? Robustness Challenges in Model Compression [68.82486784654817]
  We study two popular model compression techniques including knowledge distillation and pruning. We show that compressed models are significantly less robust than their PLM counterparts on adversarial test sets. We develop a regularization strategy for model compression based on sample uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T00:20:04Z)
• Towards Compact CNNs via Collaborative Compression [166.86915086497433]
  We propose a Collaborative Compression scheme, which joints channel pruning and tensor decomposition to compress CNN models. We achieve 52.9% FLOPs reduction by removing 48.4% parameters on ResNet-50 with only a Top-1 accuracy drop of 0.56% on ImageNet 2012.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T12:07:38Z)
• Robustness and Transferability of Universal Attacks on Compressed Models [3.187381965457262]
  Neural network compression methods like pruning and quantization are very effective at efficiently deploying Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) on edge devices. In particular, Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs), are a powerful class of adversarial attacks. We show that, in some scenarios, quantization can produce gradient-masking, giving a false sense of security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T23:40:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.