Certifying measurement incompatibility in prepare-and-measure and Bell scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06787v1
• Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:58:19 GMT
• Title: Certifying measurement incompatibility in prepare-and-measure and Bell scenarios
• Authors: Sophie Egelhaaf, Jef Pauwels, Marco Túlio Quintino, Roope Uola,
• Abstract summary: We consider the problem of certifying measurement incompatibility in a prepare-and-measure (PM) scenario. We present different families of sets of qubit measurements which are incompatible, but cannot lead to any quantum over classical advantage. Our examples are obtained via a general theorem which proves a set of qubit dichotomic measurements can have their incompatibility certified in a PM scenario.
• Score: 0.6249768559720122
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We consider the problem of certifying measurement incompatibility in a prepare-and-measure (PM) scenario. We present different families of sets of qubit measurements which are incompatible, but cannot lead to any quantum over classical advantage in PM scenarios. Our examples are obtained via a general theorem which proves a set of qubit dichotomic measurements can have their incompatibility certified in a PM scenario if and only if their incompatibility can be certified in a bipartite Bell scenario where the parties share a maximally entangled state. Our framework naturally suggests a hierarchy of increasingly stronger notions of incompatibility, in which more power is given to the classical simulation by increasing its dimensionality. For qubits, we give an example of measurements whose incompatibility can be certified against trit simulations, which we show is the strongest possible notion for qubits in this framework.

Related papers

• Certifying classes of $d$-outcome measurements with quantum steering [49.1574468325115]
  We provide a construction of a family of steering inequalities tailored to large classes of $d$-outcomes projective measurements. We prove that the maximal quantum violation of those inequalities can be used for certification of those measurements and the maximally entangled state of two qudits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T15:32:53Z)
• Constrained Measurement Incompatibility from Generalised Contextuality of Steered Preparation [2.532202013576547]
  In a bipartite Bell scenario, the measurement incompatibility in one wing is both necessary and sufficient to reveal the nonlocality. We argue that it is the generalised contextuality that provides a restriction to the allowed degree of measurement incompatibility of any viable theory of nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T12:30:23Z)
• Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
  We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection. We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z)
• Measurement incompatibility and quantum advantage in communication [0.0]
  Measurement incompatibility stipulates the existence of quantum measurements that cannot be carried out simultaneously on single systems. We show that the set of input-output probabilities obtained from d-dimensional classical systems assisted with shared randomness is the same as the set obtained from d-dimensional quantum strategies restricted to compatible measurements with shared randomness in any communication scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T06:45:01Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• Experimentally determining the incompatibility of two qubit measurements [55.41644538483948]
  We describe and realize an experimental procedure for assessing the incompatibility of two qubit measurements. We demonstrate this fact in an optical setup, where the qubit states are encoded into the photons' polarization degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T19:01:44Z)
• Certification of incompatible measurements using quantum steering [0.0]
  We consider the problem of certification of quantum measurements with an arbitrary number of outcomes. We propose a simple scheme for certifying any set of $d$-outcome projective measurements which do not share any common invariant proper subspace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T13:04:47Z)
• General Method for Classicality Certification in the Prepare and Measure Scenario [0.7829352305480285]
  Certifying the origin of measurement statistics in the prepare and measure scenario is of primal importance for developing quantum networks. We employ the method to demonstrate non-classicality activation in the prepare and measure scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T22:27:53Z)
• On the optimal certification of von Neumann measurements [55.41644538483948]
  certification of quantum measurements can be viewed as the extension of quantum hypotheses testing. We show the connection between the certification of quantum channels or von Neumann measurements and the notion of $q$-numerical range.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T22:38:23Z)
• Unambiguous discrimination of Fermionic states through local operations and classical communication [68.8204255655161]
  The paper studies unambiguous discrimination of Fermionic states through local operations and classical communication (LOCC) We show that it is not always possible to distinguish two Fermionic states through LOCC unambiguously with the same success probability as if global measurements were allowed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T21:08:52Z)
• Robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages and its applications on device-independent quantum certification [0.0]
  Given a Bell inequality, if its maximal quantum violation can be achieved only by a single set of measurements for each party or a single quantum state, up to local unitaries, one refers to such a phenomenon as self-testing. We propose a framework called "robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages" Our result is device-independent (DI), i.e., no assumption is made on the shared state and the measurement devices involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-07T14:50:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.