Robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages and its applications on device-independent quantum certification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02823v3
• Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:36:37 GMT
• Title: Robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages and its applications on device-independent quantum certification
• Authors: Shin-Liang Chen and Huan-Yu Ku and Wenbin Zhou and Jordi Tura and Yueh-Nan Chen
• Abstract summary: Given a Bell inequality, if its maximal quantum violation can be achieved only by a single set of measurements for each party or a single quantum state, up to local unitaries, one refers to such a phenomenon as self-testing. We propose a framework called "robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages" Our result is device-independent (DI), i.e., no assumption is made on the shared state and the measurement devices involved.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Given a Bell inequality, if its maximal quantum violation can be achieved only by a single set of measurements for each party or a single quantum state, up to local unitaries, one refers to such a phenomenon as self-testing. For instance, the maximal quantum violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality certifies that the underlying state contains the two-qubit maximally entangled state and the measurements of one party contains a pair of anti-commuting qubit observables. As a consequence, the other party automatically verifies the set of states remotely steered, namely the "assemblage", is in the eigenstates of a pair of anti-commuting observables. It is natural to ask if the quantum violation of the Bell inequality is not maximally achieved, or if one does not care about self-testing the state or measurements, are we capable of estimating how close the underlying assemblage is to the reference one? In this work, we provide a systematic device-independent estimation by proposing a framework called "robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages". In particular, we consider assemblages violating several paradigmatic Bell inequalities and obtain the robust self-testing statement for each scenario. Our result is device-independent (DI), i.e., no assumption is made on the shared state and the measurement devices involved. Our work thus not only paves a way for exploring the connection between the boundary of quantum set of correlations and steerable assemblages, but also provides a useful tool in the areas of DI quantum certification. As two explicit applications, we show 1) that it can be used for an alternative proof of the protocol of DI certification of all entangled two-qubit states proposed by Bowles et al., and 2) that it can be used to verify all non-entanglement-breaking qubit channels with fewer assumptions compared with the work of Rosset et al.

Related papers

• Certifying classes of $d$-outcome measurements with quantum steering [49.1574468325115]
  We provide a construction of a family of steering inequalities tailored to large classes of $d$-outcomes projective measurements. We prove that the maximal quantum violation of those inequalities can be used for certification of those measurements and the maximally entangled state of two qudits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T15:32:53Z)
• Robust self-testing of the $m-$partite maximally entangled state and observables [0.0]
  We propose a simple and efficient self-testing protocol that certifies the state and observables based on the optimal quantum violation of the Svetlichny inequality. Our method leverages an elegant sum-of-squares approach to derive the optimal quantum value of the Svetlichny functional, devoid of assuming the dimension of the quantum system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T11:03:37Z)
• Self-testing of multiple unsharpness parameters through sequential violations of non-contextual inequality [0.0]
  We put forth a protocol for self-testing of noisy quantum instruments. We derive the optimal set of quantum violations without specifying the dimension of the quantum system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T19:04:48Z)
• Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
  We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection. We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z)
• Device-independent self-testing of unsharp measurements [0.0]
  Semi-device-independent certification of an unsharp instrument has recently been demonstrated. We provide device-independent (DI) self-testing of the unsharp instrument through the quantum violation of two Bell inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T06:34:47Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• Discriminating mixed qubit states with collective measurements [0.2621730497733947]
  We propose and experimentally demonstrate a protocol for distinguishing two copies of single qubit states using collective measurements. We implement our measurements on an IBM Q System One device, a superconducting quantum processor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T14:02:26Z)
• Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
  A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements. Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z)
• Efficient Bipartite Entanglement Detection Scheme with a Quantum Adversarial Solver [89.80359585967642]
  Proposal reformulates the bipartite entanglement detection as a two-player zero-sum game completed by parameterized quantum circuits. We experimentally implement our protocol on a linear optical network and exhibit its effectiveness to accomplish the bipartite entanglement detection for 5-qubit quantum pure states and 2-qubit quantum mixed states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T09:46:45Z)
• On the optimal certification of von Neumann measurements [55.41644538483948]
  certification of quantum measurements can be viewed as the extension of quantum hypotheses testing. We show the connection between the certification of quantum channels or von Neumann measurements and the notion of $q$-numerical range.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T22:38:23Z)
• The Schmidt number of a quantum state cannot always be device-independently certified [0.0]
  We show that there exist quantum states, whose entanglement content, as measured by the Schmidt number, cannot be device-independently certified for all possible sequential measurements on any number of copies. While the bigger question: textitcan the presence of entanglement always be device-independently certified? remains open, we provide proof that quantifying entanglement device-independently is not always possible, even beyond the standard Bell scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-31T13:28:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.