A Guide To Effectively Leveraging LLMs for Low-Resource Text Summarization: Data Augmentation and Semi-supervised Approaches
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07341v2
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:26:02 GMT
- Title: A Guide To Effectively Leveraging LLMs for Low-Resource Text Summarization: Data Augmentation and Semi-supervised Approaches
- Authors: Gaurav Sahu, Olga Vechtomova, Issam H. Laradji,
- Abstract summary: Existing approaches for low-resource text summarization primarily employ large language models (LLMs) at inference time to generate summaries directly.
We propose two novel methods to effectively utilize LLMs for low-resource text summarization: 1) MixSumm, an LLM-based data augmentation regime that synthesizes high-quality documents (short and long) for few-shot text summarization, and 2) PPSL, a prompt-based pseudolabeling strategy for sample-efficient semi-supervised text summarization.
- Score: 12.582774521907227
- License:
- Abstract: Existing approaches for low-resource text summarization primarily employ large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 or GPT-4 at inference time to generate summaries directly; however, such approaches often suffer from inconsistent LLM outputs and are difficult to adapt to domain-specific data in low-resource scenarios. In this work, we propose two novel methods to effectively utilize LLMs for low-resource text summarization: 1) MixSumm, an LLM-based data augmentation regime that synthesizes high-quality documents (short and long) for few-shot text summarization, and 2) PPSL, a prompt-based pseudolabeling strategy for sample-efficient semi-supervised text summarization. Specifically, MixSumm leverages the open-source LLaMA-3-70b-Instruct model to generate new documents by mixing topical information derived from a small seed set, and PPSL leverages the LLaMA-3-70b-Instruct model to generate high-quality pseudo-labels in a semi-supervised learning setup. We evaluate our methods on the TweetSumm, WikiHow, and ArXiv/PubMed datasets and use L-Eval, a LLaMA-3-based evaluation metric, and ROUGE scores to measure the quality of generated summaries. Our experiments on extractive and abstractive summarization show that MixSumm and PPSL achieve competitive ROUGE scores as a fully supervised method with 5% of the labeled data.
Related papers
- Redefining Simplicity: Benchmarking Large Language Models from Lexical to Document Simplification [21.727596753351072]
Text simplification (TS) refers to the process of reducing the complexity of a text while retaining its original meaning and key information.
Existing work only shows that large language models (LLMs) have outperformed supervised non-LLM-based methods on sentence simplification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-12T10:38:22Z) - Assessing LLMs for Zero-shot Abstractive Summarization Through the Lens of Relevance Paraphrasing [37.400757839157116]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance at zero-shot generation of abstractive summaries for given articles.
We propose relevance paraphrasing, a simple strategy that can be used to measure the robustness of LLMs as summarizers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T12:08:43Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models for Health-Related Text Classification Tasks with Public Social Media Data [3.9459077974367833]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in NLP tasks.
We benchmarked one supervised classic machine learning model based on Support Vector Machines (SVMs), three supervised pretrained language models (PLMs) based on RoBERTa, BERTweet, and SocBERT, and two LLM based classifiers (GPT3.5 and GPT4), across 6 text classification tasks.
Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that employ-ing data augmentation using LLMs (GPT-4) with relatively small human-annotated data to train lightweight supervised classification models achieves superior results compared to training with human-annotated data
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T22:05:10Z) - TriSum: Learning Summarization Ability from Large Language Models with Structured Rationale [66.01943465390548]
We introduce TriSum, a framework for distilling large language models' text summarization abilities into a compact, local model.
Our method enhances local model performance on various benchmarks.
It also improves interpretability by providing insights into the summarization rationale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T14:36:38Z) - Found in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts Better via
Plug-and-Play Positional Encoding [78.36702055076456]
This paper introduces Multi-scale Positional.
(Ms-PoE) which is a simple yet effective plug-and-play approach to enhance the capacity of.
LLMs to handle relevant information located in the middle of the context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T04:58:37Z) - Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization [132.25202059478065]
We benchmark large language models (LLMs) on instruction controllable text summarization.
Our study reveals that instruction controllable text summarization remains a challenging task for LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T18:25:26Z) - BooookScore: A systematic exploration of book-length summarization in the era of LLMs [53.42917858142565]
We develop an automatic metric, BooookScore, that measures the proportion of sentences in a summary that do not contain any of the identified error types.
We find that closed-source LLMs such as GPT-4 and 2 produce summaries with higher BooookScore than those generated by open-source models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-01T20:46:44Z) - Summarization is (Almost) Dead [49.360752383801305]
We develop new datasets and conduct human evaluation experiments to evaluate the zero-shot generation capability of large language models (LLMs)
Our findings indicate a clear preference among human evaluators for LLM-generated summaries over human-written summaries and summaries generated by fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T08:13:01Z) - On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets.
We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z) - Element-aware Summarization with Large Language Models: Expert-aligned
Evaluation and Chain-of-Thought Method [35.181659789684545]
Automatic summarization generates concise summaries that contain key ideas of source documents.
References from CNN/DailyMail and BBC XSum are noisy, mainly in terms of factual hallucination and information redundancy.
We propose a Summary Chain-of-Thought (SumCoT) technique to elicit LLMs to generate summaries step by step.
Experimental results show our method outperforms state-of-the-art fine-tuned PLMs and zero-shot LLMs by +4.33/+4.77 in ROUGE-L.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T18:54:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.