Attribute or Abstain: Large Language Models as Long Document Assistants

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07799v2
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:00:40 GMT
• Title: Attribute or Abstain: Large Language Models as Long Document Assistants
• Authors: Jan Buchmann, Xiao Liu, Iryna Gurevych,
• Abstract summary: LLMs can help humans working with long documents, but are known to hallucinate. Existing approaches to attribution have only been evaluated in RAG settings, where the initial retrieval confounds LLM performance. This is crucially different from the long document setting, where retrieval is not needed, but could help. We present LAB, a benchmark of 6 diverse long document tasks with attribution, and experiments with different approaches to attribution on 5 LLMs of different sizes.
• Score: 58.32043134560244
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLMs can help humans working with long documents, but are known to hallucinate. Attribution can increase trust in LLM responses: The LLM provides evidence that supports its response, which enhances verifiability. Existing approaches to attribution have only been evaluated in RAG settings, where the initial retrieval confounds LLM performance. This is crucially different from the long document setting, where retrieval is not needed, but could help. Thus, a long document specific evaluation of attribution is missing. To fill this gap, we present LAB, a benchmark of 6 diverse long document tasks with attribution, and experiments with different approaches to attribution on 5 LLMs of different sizes. We find that citation, i.e. response generation and evidence extraction in one step, performs best for large and fine-tuned models, while additional retrieval can help for small, prompted models. We investigate whether the "Lost in the Middle'' phenomenon exists for attribution, but do not find this. We also find that evidence quality can predict response quality on datasets with simple responses, but not so for complex responses, as models struggle with providing evidence for complex claims.

Related papers

• Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval with Embeddings from Relevance Feedback [17.986392250269606]
  We introduce Real Document Embeddings from Relevance Feedback (ReDE-RF) Inspired by relevance feedback, ReDE-RF proposes to re-frame hypothetical document generation as a relevance estimation task. Our experiments show that ReDE-RF consistently surpasses state-of-the-art zero-shot dense retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T17:40:40Z)
• Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA [71.04146366608904]
  Long-context modeling capabilities have garnered widespread attention, leading to the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) with ultra-context windows. We propose a novel long-context benchmark, Loong, aligning with realistic scenarios through extended multi-document question answering (QA) Loong introduces four types of tasks with a range of context lengths: Spotlight Locating, Comparison, Clustering, and Chain of Reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T09:42:56Z)
• RepLiQA: A Question-Answering Dataset for Benchmarking LLMs on Unseen Reference Content [13.187520657952263]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data, most of which is automatically scraped from the internet. evaluating models on test splits that might have leaked into the training set is prone to misleading conclusions. We introduce a new test dataset named RepLiQA, suited for question-answering and topic retrieval tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T17:52:54Z)
• CaLM: Contrasting Large and Small Language Models to Verify Grounded Generation [76.31621715032558]
  Grounded generation aims to equip language models (LMs) with the ability to produce more credible and accountable responses. We introduce CaLM, a novel verification framework. Our framework empowers smaller LMs, which rely less on parametric memory, to validate the output of larger LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T06:04:55Z)
• R4: Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [32.598670876662375]
  Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) leverage relevant content retrieved by information retrieval systems to generate correct responses. Existing retriever-responder methods typically append relevant documents to the prompt of LLMs to perform text generation tasks. We propose a new pipeline named "Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder" to learn document orderings for retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T12:59:10Z)
• SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMs [85.54906813106683]
  We propose a simple yet effective framework to enhance open-domain question answering (ODQA) with large language models (LLMs) SuRe helps LLMs predict more accurate answers for a given question, which are well-supported by the summarized retrieval (SuRe) Experimental results on diverse ODQA benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of SuRe, with improvements of up to 4.6% in exact match (EM) and 4.0% in F1 score over standard prompting approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T01:15:54Z)
• Read and Think: An Efficient Step-wise Multimodal Language Model for Document Understanding and Reasoning [0.0]
  Existing document understanding models tend to generate answers with a single word or phrase directly. We use Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to generate step-wise question-and-answer pairs for document images. We then use the generated high-quality data to train a humanized document understanding and reasoning model, dubbed DocAssistant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T01:17:50Z)
• LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation [67.93134176912477]
  Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents. We propose LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question. Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T01:38:02Z)
• Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Models [68.37431984231338]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive results across a variety of tasks while requiring little or no direct supervision. We believe the ability of an LLM to an attribute to the text that it generates is likely to be crucial for both system developers and users in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T18:45:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.