Training on the Test Task Confounds Evaluation and Emergence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07890v2
• Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 07:45:33 GMT
• Title: Training on the Test Task Confounds Evaluation and Emergence
• Authors: Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Florian E. Dorner, Moritz Hardt,
• Abstract summary: We show that training on the test task confounds both relative model evaluations and claims about emergent capabilities. We propose an effective method to adjust for the effect of training on the test task on benchmark evaluations.
• Score: 16.32378359459614
• License:
• Abstract: We study a fundamental problem in the evaluation of large language models that we call training on the test task. Unlike wrongful practices like training on the test data, leakage, or data contamination, training on the test task is not a malpractice. Rather, the term describes a growing set of practices that utilize knowledge about evaluation tasks at training time. We demonstrate that training on the test task confounds both relative model evaluations and claims about emergent capabilities. We argue that the seeming superiority of one model family over another may be explained by a different degree of training on the test task. To this end, we propose an effective method to adjust for the effect of training on the test task on benchmark evaluations. Put simply, to fine-tune each model under comparison on the same task-relevant data before evaluation. We then show that instances of emergent behavior disappear gradually as models train on the test task. Our work promotes a new perspective on the evaluation of large language models with broad implications for benchmarking and the study of emergent capabilities

Related papers

• Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
  We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z)
• The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passes [30.30769701138665]
  We introduce and explore the Mirrored Influence Hypothesis, highlighting a reciprocal nature of influence between training and test data. Specifically, it suggests that evaluating the influence of training data on test predictions can be reformulated as an equivalent, yet inverse problem. We introduce a new method for estimating the influence of training data, which requires calculating gradients for specific test samples, paired with a forward pass for each training point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:43:05Z)
• How to Determine the Most Powerful Pre-trained Language Model without Brute Force Fine-tuning? An Empirical Survey [23.757740341834126]
  We show that H-Score generally performs well with superiorities in effectiveness and efficiency. We also outline the difficulties of consideration of training details, applicability to text generation, and consistency to certain metrics which shed light on future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T01:17:28Z)
• Learning to Modulate pre-trained Models in RL [22.812215561012874]
  Fine-tuning a pre-trained model often suffers from catastrophic forgetting. Our study shows that with most fine-tuning approaches, the performance on pre-training tasks deteriorates significantly. We propose a novel method, Learning-to-Modulate (L2M), that avoids the degradation of learned skills by modulating the information flow of the frozen pre-trained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T17:53:05Z)
• Test-Time Adaptation with Perturbation Consistency Learning [32.58879780726279]
  We propose a simple test-time adaptation method to promote the model to make stable predictions for samples with distribution shifts. Our method can achieve higher or comparable performance with less inference time over strong PLM backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T12:29:22Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shifts [117.72709110877939]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) has the potential to adapt a pre-trained model to unlabeled data during testing, before making predictions. We categorize TTA into several distinct groups based on the form of test data, namely, test-time domain adaptation, test-time batch adaptation, and online test-time adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T16:32:21Z)
• Mixup for Test-Time Training [4.913013713982677]
  We propose mixup in test-time training (MixTTT) which controls the change of model's parameters as well as completing the test-time procedure. We theoretically show its contribution in alleviating the mismatch problem of updated part and static part for the main task as a specific regularization effect for test-time training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T14:37:25Z)
• SUPERB-SG: Enhanced Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark for Semantic and Generative Capabilities [76.97949110580703]
  We introduce SUPERB-SG, a new benchmark to evaluate pre-trained models across various speech tasks. We use a lightweight methodology to test the robustness of representations learned by pre-trained models under shifts in data domain. We also show that the task diversity of SUPERB-SG coupled with limited task supervision is an effective recipe for evaluating the generalizability of model representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T04:26:40Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• On the Impact of Hard Adversarial Instances on Overfitting in Adversarial Training [70.82725772926949]
  Adversarial training is a popular method to robustify models against adversarial attacks. In this work, we investigate this phenomenon from the perspective of training instances. We show that the decay in generalization performance of adversarial training is a result of fitting hard adversarial instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T12:19:24Z)
• Exploring Fine-tuning Techniques for Pre-trained Cross-lingual Models via Continual Learning [74.25168207651376]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models to downstream cross-lingual tasks has shown promising results. We leverage continual learning to preserve the cross-lingual ability of the pre-trained model when we fine-tune it to downstream tasks. Our methods achieve better performance than other fine-tuning baselines on the zero-shot cross-lingual part-of-speech tagging and named entity recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T14:07:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.