Meta-Analysis with Untrusted Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09387v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 16:07:53 GMT
• Title: Meta-Analysis with Untrusted Data
• Authors: Shiva Kaul, Geoffrey J. Gordon,
• Abstract summary: We show how to answer causal questions much more precisely by making two changes to meta-analysis. First, we incorporate untrusted data drawn from large observational databases. Second, we train richer models capable of handling heterogeneous trials.
• Score: 14.28797726638936
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: [See paper for full abstract] Meta-analysis is a crucial tool for answering scientific questions. It is usually conducted on a relatively small amount of ``trusted'' data -- ideally from randomized, controlled trials -- which allow causal effects to be reliably estimated with minimal assumptions. We show how to answer causal questions much more precisely by making two changes. First, we incorporate untrusted data drawn from large observational databases, related scientific literature and practical experience -- without sacrificing rigor or introducing strong assumptions. Second, we train richer models capable of handling heterogeneous trials, addressing a long-standing challenge in meta-analysis. Our approach is based on conformal prediction, which fundamentally produces rigorous prediction intervals, but doesn't handle indirect observations: in meta-analysis, we observe only noisy effects due to the limited number of participants in each trial. To handle noise, we develop a simple, efficient version of fully-conformal kernel ridge regression, based on a novel condition called idiocentricity. We introduce noise-correcting terms in the residuals and analyze their interaction with a ``variance shaving'' technique. In multiple experiments on healthcare datasets, our algorithms deliver tighter, sounder intervals than traditional ones. This paper charts a new course for meta-analysis and evidence-based medicine, where heterogeneity and untrusted data are embraced for more nuanced and precise predictions.

Related papers

• Selective Inference for Time-Varying Effect Moderation [3.8233569758620063]
  Causal effect moderation investigates how the effect of interventions (or treatments) on outcome variables changes based on observed characteristics of individuals. High-dimensional analyses often lack interpretability, with important moderators masked by noise. We propose a two-step method for selective inference on time-varying causal effect moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T16:37:48Z)
• High-dimensional logistic regression with missing data: Imputation, regularization, and universality [7.167672851569787]
  We study high-dimensional, ridge-regularized logistic regression. We provide exact characterizations of both the prediction error and the estimation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T21:41:21Z)
• Debiasing Machine Learning Models by Using Weakly Supervised Learning [3.3298048942057523]
  We tackle the problem of bias mitigation of algorithmic decisions in a setting where both the output of the algorithm and the sensitive variable are continuous. Typical examples are unfair decisions made with respect to the age or the financial status. Our bias mitigation strategy is a weakly supervised learning method which requires that a small portion of the data can be measured in a fair manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:11:32Z)
• Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrieval [139.21955930418815]
  Cross-modal Retrieval methods build similarity relations between vision and language modalities by jointly learning a common representation space. However, the predictions are often unreliable due to the Aleatoric uncertainty, which is induced by low-quality data, e.g., corrupt images, fast-paced videos, and non-detailed texts. We propose a novel Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification (PAU) framework to provide trustworthy predictions by quantifying the uncertainty arisen from the inherent data ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T09:41:19Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets [53.34152466646884]
  In this paper, we show how bringing recent results on equivariant representation learning instantiated on structured spaces together with simple use of classical results on causal inference provides an effective practical solution. We demonstrate how our model allows dealing with more than one nuisance variable under some assumptions and can enable analysis of pooled scientific datasets in scenarios that would otherwise entail removing a large portion of the samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T04:54:06Z)
• Calibration of prediction rules for life-time outcomes using prognostic Cox regression survival models and multiple imputations to account for missing predictor data with cross-validatory assessment [0.0]
  Methods are described to combine imputation with predictive calibration in survival modeling subject to censoring. Prediction-averaging appears to have superior statistical properties, especially smaller predictive variation, as opposed to a direct application of Rubin's rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-04T20:10:12Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)
• Stable Prediction via Leveraging Seed Variable [73.9770220107874]
  Previous machine learning methods might exploit subtly spurious correlations in training data induced by non-causal variables for prediction. We propose a conditional independence test based algorithm to separate causal variables with a seed variable as priori, and adopt them for stable prediction. Our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art methods for stable prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T06:56:31Z)
• An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlations [98.3066727301239]
  We identify two key properties of the training data that drive this behavior. We show how the inductive bias of models towards "memorizing" fewer examples can cause over parameterization to hurt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T01:59:13Z)
• MissDeepCausal: Causal Inference from Incomplete Data Using Deep Latent Variable Models [14.173184309520453]
  State-of-the-art methods for causal inference don't consider missing values. Missing data require an adapted unconfoundedness hypothesis. Latent confounders whose distribution is learned through variational autoencoders adapted to missing values are considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T12:58:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.