Characterizing Disparity Between Edge Models and High-Accuracy Base Models for Vision Tasks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10016v1
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 22:05:58 GMT
- Title: Characterizing Disparity Between Edge Models and High-Accuracy Base Models for Vision Tasks
- Authors: Zhenyu Wang, Shahriar Nirjon,
- Abstract summary: We introduce XDELTA, a novel explainable AI tool that explains differences between a high-accuracy base model and a computationally efficient but lower-accuracy edge model.
We conduct a comprehensive evaluation to test XDELTA's ability to explain model discrepancies, using over 1.2 million images and 24 models, and assessing real-world deployments with six participants.
- Score: 5.081175754775484
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Edge devices, with their widely varying capabilities, support a diverse range of edge AI models. This raises the question: how does an edge model differ from a high-accuracy (base) model for the same task? We introduce XDELTA, a novel explainable AI tool that explains differences between a high-accuracy base model and a computationally efficient but lower-accuracy edge model. To achieve this, we propose a learning-based approach to characterize the model difference, named the DELTA network, which complements the feature representation capability of the edge network in a compact form. To construct DELTA, we propose a sparsity optimization framework that extracts the essence of the base model to ensure compactness and sufficient feature representation capability of DELTA, and implement a negative correlation learning approach to ensure it complements the edge model. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation to test XDELTA's ability to explain model discrepancies, using over 1.2 million images and 24 models, and assessing real-world deployments with six participants. XDELTA excels in explaining differences between base and edge models (arbitrary pairs as well as compressed base models) through geometric and concept-level analysis, proving effective in real-world applications.
Related papers
- Exploring Model Kinship for Merging Large Language Models [52.01652098827454]
We introduce model kinship, the degree of similarity or relatedness between Large Language Models.
We find that there is a certain relationship between model kinship and the performance gains after model merging.
We propose a new model merging strategy: Top-k Greedy Merging with Model Kinship, which can yield better performance on benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T14:29:29Z) - Enabling Small Models for Zero-Shot Classification through Model Label Learning [50.68074833512999]
We introduce a novel paradigm, Model Label Learning (MLL), which bridges the gap between models and their functionalities.
Experiments on seven real-world datasets validate the effectiveness and efficiency of MLL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T09:08:26Z) - Latent Semantic Consensus For Deterministic Geometric Model Fitting [109.44565542031384]
We propose an effective method called Latent Semantic Consensus (LSC)
LSC formulates the model fitting problem into two latent semantic spaces based on data points and model hypotheses.
LSC is able to provide consistent and reliable solutions within only a few milliseconds for general multi-structural model fitting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T05:35:38Z) - Leveraging Model-based Trees as Interpretable Surrogate Models for Model
Distillation [3.5437916561263694]
Surrogate models play a crucial role in retrospectively interpreting complex and powerful black box machine learning models.
This paper focuses on using model-based trees as surrogate models which partition the feature space into interpretable regions via decision rules.
Four model-based tree algorithms, namely SLIM, GUIDE, MOB, and CTree, are compared regarding their ability to generate such surrogate models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T19:06:52Z) - The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different
Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours.
We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length.
This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z) - Accurate deep learning sub-grid scale models for large eddy simulations [0.0]
We present two families of sub-grid scale (SGS) turbulence models developed for large-eddy simulation (LES) purposes.
Their development required the formulation of physics-informed robust and efficient Deep Learning (DL) algorithms.
Explicit filtering of data from direct simulations of canonical channel flow at two friction Reynolds numbers provided accurate data for training and testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T15:30:06Z) - Evaluating Representations with Readout Model Switching [18.475866691786695]
In this paper, we propose to use the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle to devise an evaluation metric.
We design a hybrid discrete and continuous-valued model space for the readout models and employ a switching strategy to combine their predictions.
The proposed metric can be efficiently computed with an online method and we present results for pre-trained vision encoders of various architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T14:08:01Z) - Switchable Representation Learning Framework with Self-compatibility [50.48336074436792]
We propose a Switchable representation learning Framework with Self-Compatibility (SFSC)
SFSC generates a series of compatible sub-models with different capacities through one training process.
SFSC achieves state-of-the-art performance on the evaluated datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T16:46:32Z) - PSD2 Explainable AI Model for Credit Scoring [0.0]
The aim of this project is to develop and test advanced analytical methods to improve the prediction accuracy of Credit Risk Models.
The project focuses on applying an explainable machine learning model to bank-related databases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-20T12:12:38Z) - Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors.
We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method.
Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.