PSD2 Explainable AI Model for Credit Scoring

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.10367v3
• Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:18:04 GMT
• Title: PSD2 Explainable AI Model for Credit Scoring
• Authors: Neus Llop Torrent (1 and 2), Giorgio Visani (2 and 3), Enrico Bagli (2) ((1) Politecnico di Milano Graduate School of Business, (2) CRIF S.p.A, (3) University of Bologna School of Informatics and Engineering)
• Abstract summary: The aim of this project is to develop and test advanced analytical methods to improve the prediction accuracy of Credit Risk Models. The project focuses on applying an explainable machine learning model to bank-related databases.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The aim of this project is to develop and test advanced analytical methods to improve the prediction accuracy of Credit Risk Models, preserving at the same time the model interpretability. In particular, the project focuses on applying an explainable machine learning model to bank-related databases. The input data were obtained from open data. Over the total proven models, CatBoost has shown the highest performance. The algorithm implementation produces a GINI of 0.68 after tuning the hyper-parameters. SHAP package is used to provide a global and local interpretation of the model predictions to formulate a human-comprehensive approach to understanding the decision-maker algorithm. The 20 most important features are selected using the Shapley values to present a full human-understandable model that reveals how the attributes of an individual are related to its model prediction.

Related papers

• Characterizing Disparity Between Edge Models and High-Accuracy Base Models for Vision Tasks [5.081175754775484]
  We introduce XDELTA, a novel explainable AI tool that explains differences between a high-accuracy base model and a computationally efficient but lower-accuracy edge model. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation to test XDELTA's ability to explain model discrepancies, using over 1.2 million images and 24 models, and assessing real-world deployments with six participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-13T22:05:58Z)
• Data Shapley in One Training Run [88.59484417202454]
  Data Shapley provides a principled framework for attributing data's contribution within machine learning contexts. Existing approaches require re-training models on different data subsets, which is computationally intensive. This paper introduces In-Run Data Shapley, which addresses these limitations by offering scalable data attribution for a target model of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T17:09:24Z)
• Decomposing and Editing Predictions by Modeling Model Computation [75.37535202884463]
  We introduce a task called component modeling. The goal of component modeling is to decompose an ML model's prediction in terms of its components. We present COAR, a scalable algorithm for estimating component attributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:28:08Z)
• Latent Semantic Consensus For Deterministic Geometric Model Fitting [109.44565542031384]
  We propose an effective method called Latent Semantic Consensus (LSC) LSC formulates the model fitting problem into two latent semantic spaces based on data points and model hypotheses. LSC is able to provide consistent and reliable solutions within only a few milliseconds for general multi-structural model fitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T05:35:38Z)
• Beyond explaining: XAI-based Adaptive Learning with SHAP Clustering for Energy Consumption Prediction [0.0]
  We introduce a three-stage process: obtaining SHAP values to explain model predictions, clustering SHAP values to identify distinct patterns and outliers, and refining the model based on the derived SHAP clustering characteristics. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in both task types, resulting in improved predictive performance and interpretable model explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T15:58:51Z)
• Precision-Recall Divergence Optimization for Generative Modeling with GANs and Normalizing Flows [54.050498411883495]
  We develop a novel training method for generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks and Normalizing Flows. We show that achieving a specified precision-recall trade-off corresponds to minimizing a unique $f$-divergence from a family we call the textitPR-divergences. Our approach improves the performance of existing state-of-the-art models like BigGAN in terms of either precision or recall when tested on datasets such as ImageNet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T10:07:17Z)
• Evaluating Representations with Readout Model Switching [19.907607374144167]
  In this paper, we propose to use the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle to devise an evaluation metric. We design a hybrid discrete and continuous-valued model space for the readout models and employ a switching strategy to combine their predictions. The proposed metric can be efficiently computed with an online method and we present results for pre-trained vision encoders of various architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T14:08:01Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and Calibration [11.75395256889808]
  We develop a set of algorithms that combine the probabilistic output of a model with the class-level output of a human. We show theoretically that the accuracy of our combination model is driven not only by the individual human and model accuracies, but also by the model's confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T17:43:15Z)
• To what extent do human explanations of model behavior align with actual model behavior? [91.67905128825402]
  We investigated the extent to which human-generated explanations of models' inference decisions align with how models actually make these decisions. We defined two alignment metrics that quantify how well natural language human explanations align with model sensitivity to input words. We find that a model's alignment with human explanations is not predicted by the model's accuracy on NLI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T17:40:06Z)
• Energy Predictive Models for Convolutional Neural Networks on Mobile Platforms [0.0]
  Energy use is a key concern when deploying deep learning models on mobile devices. We build layer-type predictive models for the fully-connected and pooling layers using 12 representative Convolutional NeuralNetworks (ConvNets) on the Jetson TX1 and the Snapdragon 820. We obtain an accuracy between 76% to 85% and a model complexity of 1 for the overall energy prediction of the test ConvNets across different hardware-software combinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-10T17:35:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.