Empirical Mean and Frequency Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy: A Worst-Case Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11274v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:46:02 GMT
• Title: Empirical Mean and Frequency Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy: A Worst-Case Analysis
• Authors: Syomantak Chaudhuri, Thomas A. Courtade,
• Abstract summary: Differential Privacy (DP) is the current gold-standard for measuring privacy. We consider the problems of empirical mean estimation for univariate data and frequency estimation for categorical data, subject to heterogeneous privacy constraints. We prove some optimality results, under both PAC error and mean-squared error, for our proposed algorithms and demonstrate superior performance over other baseline techniques experimentally.
• Score: 5.755004576310333
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Differential Privacy (DP) is the current gold-standard for measuring privacy. Estimation problems under DP constraints appearing in the literature have largely focused on providing equal privacy to all users. We consider the problems of empirical mean estimation for univariate data and frequency estimation for categorical data, two pillars of data analysis in the industry, subject to heterogeneous privacy constraints. Each user, contributing a sample to the dataset, is allowed to have a different privacy demand. The dataset itself is assumed to be worst-case and we study both the problems in two different formulations -- the correlated and the uncorrelated setting. In the former setting, the privacy demand and the user data can be arbitrarily correlated while in the latter setting, there is no correlation between the dataset and the privacy demand. We prove some optimality results, under both PAC error and mean-squared error, for our proposed algorithms and demonstrate superior performance over other baseline techniques experimentally.

Related papers

• Optimal Federated Learning for Nonparametric Regression with Heterogeneous Distributed Differential Privacy Constraints [5.3595271893779906]
  We study federated learning for nonparametric regression in the context of distributed samples across different servers. Findings shed light on the tradeoff between statistical accuracy and privacy preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T19:34:07Z)
• Initialization Matters: Privacy-Utility Analysis of Overparameterized Neural Networks [72.51255282371805]
  We prove a privacy bound for the KL divergence between model distributions on worst-case neighboring datasets. We find that this KL privacy bound is largely determined by the expected squared gradient norm relative to model parameters during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:13:22Z)
• Conditional Density Estimations from Privacy-Protected Data [0.0]
  We propose simulation-based inference methods from privacy-protected datasets. We illustrate our methods on discrete time-series data under an infectious disease model and with ordinary linear regression models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T14:34:17Z)
• Mean Estimation with User-level Privacy under Data Heterogeneity [54.07947274508013]
  Different users may possess vastly different numbers of data points. It cannot be assumed that all users sample from the same underlying distribution. We propose a simple model of heterogeneous user data that allows user data to differ in both distribution and quantity of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T23:02:39Z)
• On Differential Privacy and Adaptive Data Analysis with Bounded Space [76.10334958368618]
  We study the space complexity of the two related fields of differential privacy and adaptive data analysis. We show that there exists a problem P that requires exponentially more space to be solved efficiently with differential privacy. The line of work on adaptive data analysis focuses on understanding the number of samples needed for answering a sequence of adaptive queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T14:45:31Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraints [0.0]
  We show how to characterize the power of a statistical test under differential privacy in a plug-and-play fashion. We show that maintaining privacy results in a noticeable reduction in performance only when the level of privacy protection is very high. Finally, we demonstrate that the DP-SGLD algorithm, a private convex solver, can be employed for maximum likelihood estimation with a high degree of confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T12:55:53Z)
• DP2-Pub: Differentially Private High-Dimensional Data Publication with Invariant Post Randomization [58.155151571362914]
  We propose a differentially private high-dimensional data publication mechanism (DP2-Pub) that runs in two phases. splitting attributes into several low-dimensional clusters with high intra-cluster cohesion and low inter-cluster coupling helps obtain a reasonable privacy budget. We also extend our DP2-Pub mechanism to the scenario with a semi-honest server which satisfies local differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T17:52:43Z)
• Private Domain Adaptation from a Public Source [48.83724068578305]
  We design differentially private discrepancy-based algorithms for adaptation from a source domain with public labeled data to a target domain with unlabeled private data. Our solutions are based on private variants of Frank-Wolfe and Mirror-Descent algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T06:52:55Z)
• Combining Public and Private Data [7.975795748574989]
  We introduce a mixed estimator of the mean optimized to minimize variance. We argue that our mechanism is preferable to techniques that preserve the privacy of individuals by subsampling data proportionally to the privacy needs of users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T23:25:49Z)
• Robust and Differentially Private Mean Estimation [40.323756738056616]
  Differential privacy has emerged as a standard requirement in a variety of applications ranging from the U.S. Census to data collected in commercial devices. An increasing number of such databases consist of data from multiple sources, not all of which can be trusted. This leaves existing private analyses vulnerable to attacks by an adversary who injects corrupted data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T05:02:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.