How Personality Traits Influence Negotiation Outcomes? A Simulation based on Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11549v2
• Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 16:24:41 GMT
• Title: How Personality Traits Influence Negotiation Outcomes? A Simulation based on Large Language Models
• Authors: Yin Jou Huang, Rafik Hadfi,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a simulation framework centered on Large Language Model (LLM) agents endowed with synthesized personality traits. The experimental results show that the behavioral tendencies of LLM-based simulations could reproduce behavioral patterns observed in human negotiations.
• Score: 2.7010154811483167
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Psychological evidence reveals the influence of personality traits on decision-making. For instance, agreeableness is generally associated with positive outcomes in negotiations, whereas neuroticism is often linked to less favorable outcomes. This paper introduces a simulation framework centered on Large Language Model (LLM) agents endowed with synthesized personality traits. The agents negotiate within bargaining domains and possess customizable personalities and objectives. The experimental results show that the behavioral tendencies of LLM-based simulations could reproduce behavioral patterns observed in human negotiations. The contribution is twofold. First, we propose a simulation methodology that investigates the alignment between the linguistic and economic capabilities of LLM agents. Secondly, we offer empirical insights into the strategic impact of Big-Five personality traits on the outcomes of bilateral negotiations. We also provide a case study based on synthesized bargaining dialogues to reveal intriguing behaviors, including deceitful and compromising behaviors.

Related papers

• GLEE: A Unified Framework and Benchmark for Language-based Economic Environments [19.366120861935105]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show significant potential in economic and strategic interactions. These questions become crucial concerning the economic and societal implications of integrating LLM-based agents into real-world data-driven systems. We introduce a benchmark for standardizing research on two-player, sequential, language-based games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T17:55:35Z)
• Self-Emotion Blended Dialogue Generation in Social Simulation Agents [18.781929161272853]
  This study explores how self-emotion affects the agents' behaviors in dialogue strategies and decision-making within a large language model (LLM)-driven simulation framework. The results show that incorporating self-emotion helps agents exhibit more human-like dialogue strategies. In a virtual simulation environment where agents have discussions on multiple topics, we show that self-emotion of agents can significantly influence the decision-making process of the agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T02:11:48Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Large Language Models Can Infer Personality from Free-Form User Interactions [0.0]
  GPT-4 can infer personality with moderate accuracy, outperforming previous approaches. Results show that the direct focus on personality assessment did not result in a less positive user experience. Preliminary analyses suggest that the accuracy of personality inferences varies only marginally across different socio-demographic subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T20:33:36Z)
• AgentGroupChat: An Interactive Group Chat Simulacra For Better Eliciting Emergent Behavior [44.82972192477596]
  We introduce AgentGroupChat, a simulation that delves into the complex role of language in shaping collective behavior. We set four narrative scenarios based on AgentGroupChat to demonstrate the simulation's capacity to mimic complex language use in group dynamics. Results reveal that emergent behaviors materialize from a confluence of factors: a conducive environment for extensive information exchange, characters with diverse traits, high linguistic comprehension, and strategic adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T09:21:32Z)
• LLMs Simulate Big Five Personality Traits: Further Evidence [51.13560635563004]
  We analyze the personality traits simulated by Llama2, GPT4, and Mixtral. This contributes to the broader understanding of the capabilities of LLMs to simulate personality traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T13:45:25Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
  Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions. Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z)
• MindDial: Belief Dynamics Tracking with Theory-of-Mind Modeling for Situated Neural Dialogue Generation [62.44907105496227]
  MindDial is a novel conversational framework that can generate situated free-form responses with theory-of-mind modeling. We introduce an explicit mind module that can track the speaker's belief and the speaker's prediction of the listener's belief. Our framework is applied to both prompting and fine-tuning-based models, and is evaluated across scenarios involving both common ground alignment and negotiation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T07:24:32Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.