Towards Aligning Language Models with Textual Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16970v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 03:32:05 GMT
• Title: Towards Aligning Language Models with Textual Feedback
• Authors: Saüc Abadal Lloret, Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Keerthiram Murugesan, Mrinmaya Sachan,
• Abstract summary: ALT (ALignment with Textual feedback) is an approach that aligns language models with user preferences expressed in text. We explore the efficacy and efficiency of textual feedback across different tasks such as toxicity reduction, summarization, and dialog response generation.
• Score: 43.55450701925131
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present ALT (ALignment with Textual feedback), an approach that aligns language models with user preferences expressed in text. We argue that text offers greater expressiveness, enabling users to provide richer feedback than simple comparative preferences and this richer feedback can lead to more efficient and effective alignment. ALT aligns the model by conditioning its generation on the textual feedback. Our method relies solely on language modeling techniques and requires minimal hyper-parameter tuning, though it still presents the main benefits of RL-based alignment algorithms and can effectively learn from textual feedback. We explore the efficacy and efficiency of textual feedback across different tasks such as toxicity reduction, summarization, and dialog response generation. We find that ALT outperforms PPO for the task of toxicity reduction while being able to match its performance on summarization with only 20% of the samples. We also explore how ALT can be used with feedback provided by an existing LLM where we explore an LLM providing constrained and unconstrained textual feedback. We also outline future directions to align models with natural language feedback.

Related papers

• RALLRec+: Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model Recommendation with Reasoning [22.495874056980824]
  We propose Representation learning and textbfReasoning empowered retrieval-textbfAugmented textbfLarge textbfLanguage model textbfRecommendation (RALLRec+).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T11:03:34Z)
• RALLRec: Improving Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model Recommendation with Representation Learning [24.28601381739682]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been integrated into recommendation systems to enhance user behavior comprehension.<n>Existing RAG methods rely primarily on textual semantics and often fail to incorporate the most relevant items.<n>We propose Representation learning for retrieval-Augmented Large Language model Recommendation (RALLRec)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T02:15:12Z)
• CELA: Cost-Efficient Language Model Alignment for CTR Prediction [71.85120354973073]
  Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction holds a paramount position in recommender systems. Recent efforts have sought to mitigate these challenges by integrating Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) We propose textbfCost-textbfEfficient textbfLanguage Model textbfAlignment (textbfCELA) for CTR prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T07:43:25Z)
• RLVF: Learning from Verbal Feedback without Overgeneralization [94.19501420241188]
  We study the problem of incorporating verbal feedback without such overgeneralization. We develop a new method Contextualized Critiques with Constrained Preference Optimization (C3PO) Our approach effectively applies verbal feedback to relevant scenarios while preserving existing behaviors for other contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:50:24Z)
• Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration [63.84454768573154]
  We take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts at which to obtain human feedback to most efficiently identify a good policy. We propose an active exploration algorithm to efficiently select the data and provide theoretical proof that it has a worst-case regret bound. Our method outperforms the baselines with limited samples of human preferences on several language models and four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z)
• UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
  We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z)
• Training Language Models with Language Feedback at Scale [50.70091340506957]
  We introduce learning from Language Feedback (ILF), a new approach that utilizes more informative language feedback. ILF consists of three steps that are applied iteratively: first, conditioning the language model on the input, an initial LM output, and feedback to generate refinements. We show theoretically that ILF can be viewed as Bayesian Inference, similar to Reinforcement Learning from human feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:04:15Z)
• Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learning [87.76695816348027]
  Large language models can be inconsistent when it comes to completing user specified tasks. We propose a novel RL method, that combines both the flexible utility framework of RL with the ability of supervised learning. In addition to empirically validating ILQL, we present a detailed empirical analysis situations where offline RL can be useful in natural language generation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-05T18:38:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.