Unveiling Legitimacy in the unexpected events context : An Inquiry into Information System Consultancy companies and international organizations through Topic Modeling Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17509v1
• Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 07:44:03 GMT
• Title: Unveiling Legitimacy in the unexpected events context : An Inquiry into Information System Consultancy companies and international organizations through Topic Modeling Analysis
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on the communication of two key stakeholders: IS consultancy companies and international organizations. To achieve this objective, we examined a diverse array of publications released by both actors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In an increasingly dynamic and modern market, the recurrence of unexpected events necessitates proactive responses from information system (IS) stakeholders. Each IS actor strives to legitimize its actions and communicate its strategy. This study delves into the realm of IS legitimation, focusing on the communication of two key stakeholders: IS consultancy companies and international organizations, particularly in the context of unexpected events. To achieve this objective, we examined a diverse array of publications released by both actors. Employing a topic modeling methodology, we analyzed these documents to extract valuable insights regarding their methods of legitimation. Through this research, we aim to contribute to the legitimation discourse literature by offering an exploration of two key IS stakeholders responding to the challenges posed by unexpected events.

Related papers

• Large Language Models and Social Media Information Integrity: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions [16.02370545528885]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools that impact information integrity on social media platforms.<n>This comprehensive review examines the dual role of LLMs in both facilitating and mitigating various information integrity challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T02:32:43Z)
• Unleashing Multimodal Large Language Models for Training-free HOI Detection in the Wild [49.77540427384148]
  We present AgentHOI, a training-free, agentic framework that transfers the generalist multimodal reasoning capabilities of foundation models to HOI detection in the wild.<n>To address the challenges of incomplete interaction discovery and ambiguous localization in complex scenes, we introduce two key mechanisms.<n>AgentHOI achieves superior performance over state-of-the-art supervised and weakly supervised methods in real-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T14:30:20Z)
• LLMs in the Real World: Evaluating "AI" in Emergency Contexts [2.115590859976976]
  We present a case study on the initial stages of an LLM-based machine translation application's deployment in a real-world context.<n>We identify a number of common misconceptions about technologies such as these, concluding with a set of concrete recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T19:27:25Z)
• An Agentic Operationalization of DISARM for FIMI Investigation on Social Media [0.0]
  Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) and related hybrid activities are conducted across various societal dimensions and infospheres.<n>Recent advances in AI have led to the decreasing cost of AI-augmented trolling and interference activities.<n>We propose a framework-agnostic agent-based operationalization of DISARM to investigate FIMI on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:50:13Z)
• Tackling One Health Risks: How Large Language Models are leveraged for Risk Negotiation and Consensus-building [28.130694535835207]
  This study presents an AI-assisted negotiation framework that incorporates large language models (LLMs) and AI-based autonomous agents.<n>The framework enables stakeholders to simulate negotiations, systematically model dynamics, anticipate compromises, and evaluate solution impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T00:25:20Z)
• Who's important? -- SUnSET: Synergistic Understanding of Stakeholder, Events and Time for Timeline Generation [24.429006063826016]
  We present SUnSET: Synergistic Understanding of stakeholder, events and time for the task of Timeline Summarization (TLS)<n>We leverage powerful Large Language Models (LLMs) to build SET triplets and introduced the use of stakeholder-based ranking to construct a $Relevancy$ metric.<n>Our experimental results outperform all prior baselines and emerged as the new State-of-the-Art, highlighting the impact of stakeholder information within news article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T15:14:39Z)
• The Truth Becomes Clearer Through Debate! Multi-Agent Systems with Large Language Models Unmask Fake News [39.260570381498866]
  TruEDebate (TED) is a novel multi-agent system for detecting fake news on social networks.<n>TED employs a rigorous debate process inspired by formal debate settings.<n>The DebateFlow Agents organize agents into two teams, where one supports and the other challenges the truth of the news.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T13:03:20Z)
• A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition [71.61103962200666]
  Zero-shot named entity recognition (NER) aims to develop entity recognition systems from unannotated text corpora. Recent work has adapted large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot NER by crafting specialized prompt templates. We introduce the cooperative multi-agent system (CMAS), a novel framework for zero-shot NER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:30:43Z)
• Which Information should the UK and US AISI share with an International Network of AISIs? Opportunities, Risks, and a Tentative Proposal [0.0]
  The UK AI Safety Institute (UK) and its parallel organisation in the United States (US) take up a unique position in the recently established International Network of jurisdictions. This paper argues that it is in the interest of both institutions to share specific categories of information with the International Network of evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T16:49:02Z)
• Illusions of Relevance: Using Content Injection Attacks to Deceive Retrievers, Rerankers, and LLM Judges [52.96987928118327]
  We find that embedding models for retrieval, rerankers, and large language model (LLM) relevance judges are vulnerable to content injection attacks. We identify two primary threats: (1) inserting unrelated or harmful content within passages that still appear deceptively "relevant", and (2) inserting entire queries or key query terms into passages to boost their perceived relevance. Our study systematically examines the factors that influence an attack's success, such as the placement of injected content and the balance between relevant and non-relevant material.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:02:15Z)
• The Imperative of Conversation Analysis in the Era of LLMs: A Survey of Tasks, Techniques, and Trends [64.99423243200296]
  Conversation Analysis (CA) strives to uncover and analyze critical information from conversation data. In this paper, we perform a thorough review and systematize CA task to summarize the existing related work. We derive four key steps of CA from conversation scene reconstruction, to in-depth attribution analysis, and then to performing targeted training, finally generating conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T16:52:43Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Unmasking the Shadows of AI: Investigating Deceptive Capabilities in Large Language Models [0.0]
  This research critically navigates the intricate landscape of AI deception, concentrating on deceptive behaviours of Large Language Models (LLMs) My objective is to elucidate this issue, examine the discourse surrounding it, and subsequently delve into its categorization and ramifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T00:21:46Z)
• Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review of Current Practices [89.85174013619883]
  We focus on text summarization, a common NLP task largely overlooked by the responsible AI community. We conduct a multi-round qualitative analysis of 333 summarization papers from the ACL Anthology published between 2020-2022. We focus on how, which, and when responsible AI issues are covered, which relevant stakeholders are considered, and mismatches between stated and realized research goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T15:35:36Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• AI Ethics Statements -- Analysis and lessons learnt from NeurIPS Broader Impact Statements [0.0]
  In 2020, the machine learning (ML) conference NeurIPS broke new ground by requiring that all papers include a broader impact statement. This requirement was removed in 2021, in favour of a checklist approach. We have created a dataset containing the impact statements from all NeurIPS 2020 papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T16:17:12Z)
• Machine Learning for Fraud Detection in E-Commerce: A Research Agenda [1.1726720776908521]
  We take an organization-centric view on the topic of fraud detection by formulating an operational model of the anti-fraud departments in e-commerce organizations. We derive 6 research topics and 12 practical challenges for fraud detection from this operational model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:37:29Z)
• Topic-Aware Multi-turn Dialogue Modeling [91.52820664879432]
  This paper presents a novel solution for multi-turn dialogue modeling, which segments and extracts topic-aware utterances in an unsupervised way. Our topic-aware modeling is implemented by a newly proposed unsupervised topic-aware segmentation algorithm and Topic-Aware Dual-attention Matching (TADAM) Network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:43:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.